Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:55:37.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thinking about the body as subject

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Daniel Morgan*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of York, York, UK

Abstract

The notion of immunity to error through misidentification (IEM) has played a central role in discussions of first-person thought. It seems like a way of making precise the idea of thinking about oneself ‘as subject’. Asking whether bodily first-person judgments (e.g. ‘My legs are crossed’) can be IEM is a way of asking whether one can think about oneself simultaneously as a subject and as a bodily thing. The majority view is that one cannot. I rebut that view, arguing that on all the notions of IEM that have so far been successfully defined, bodily first-person judgments can be IEM.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, B., and Blome-Tillmann, M.. 2014. “Counter Closure and Knowledge despite Falsehood.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 64 (257): 552568. doi:10.1093/pq/pqu033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J., 1997. “Sense, Reference and Selective Attention.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 71: 5574. doi:10.1111/1467-8349.00019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J., 1999b. “Schizophrenia, the Space of Reasons and Thinking as a Motor Process.” The Monist, 82 (4): 609625. doi:10.5840/monist199982426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H., and Dever, J.. 2013. The Inessential Indexical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A., 2006. “Error Through Misidentification: Some Varieties.” Journal of Philosophy, 103 (8): 403425. doi:10.5840/jphil2006103824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coliva, A., 2012. “Which ‘Key to All Mythologies’ about the Self? – A Note on Where the Illusions of Transcendence Come from and How to Resist Them.” In The Varieties of Reference, edited by Evans, G., Prosser, , and Recanati, . New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Evans, G., 1982. The Varieties of Reference, edited by McDowell, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, T., and Liang, C.. 2011. “Self-Consciousness and Immunity.” Journal of Philosophy, 108 (2): 7899. doi:10.5840/jphil201110824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Brien, L., 2007. Self-Knowing Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D., 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pryor, J., 1999. “Immunity to Error through Misidentification.” Philosophical Topics, 26: 271304. doi:10.5840/philtopics1999261/246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J., 2013. “Problems for Credulism.” In Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism, edited by Tucker, C.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F., 2012. “Immunity to Error through Misidentification: What It Is and Where It Comes From.” In Immunity to Error Through Misidentification: New Essays. edited by, Prosser, S. and Recanati, F.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S., 1968. “Self-Reference and Self-Awareness.” The Journal of Philosophy, 65 (19): 555567. doi:10.2307/2024121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., 2006. “Which Immunity to Error?Philosophical Studies, 130 (2): 273283. doi:10.1007/s11098-004-4513-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T., 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, C., 2012. “Reflections on François Recanati’s, ‘Immunity to Error through Misidentification: What It Is and Where It Comes From’.” In Immunity to Error Through Misidentification: New Essays, edited by Prosser, S. and Recanati, F.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar