Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:54:53.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Representative Theory Of Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

J. B. Maund
J. B. Maund*
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I wish to propose and defend a form of the Representative Theory of Perception (RTP). According to this version of the theory, when a subject perceives some object x to be in a state P1 he does so by being aware of some modfication M1 (from a range M1,M2, … Mn) of some object E. The subject's way of perceiving any one of a range of objects x,y,z, … is that of being aware of some modification of E (leaving it open whether E is the subject himself, a person, an ego or a sense-field, e.g., a visual field). It will be a necessary condition of someone's perceiving x to have property P1 that E be modified in some way. And in order for the modifications of E to be representations, a given property P1 will need to be causally related, characteristically, to one or more specific modifications, M1,M2, … Mn, of E. (For simplicity, instead of taking the physical states or modifications P1,P2, … Pn to be states of individual physical objects, I shall assume them to be modifications of the physical world (in toto) symbolized by ‘X'.)

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , September 1975 , pp. 41 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, D.M. (1961), Perception and the Physical World, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.M. (1968), A Materialist Theory of Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1947), The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Broad, C.D. (1949), Scientific Thought, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Rollins, C.D. (1969), Contemporary Philosophy in Australia, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Campbell, K. (1969), ‘Colours', in Brown and Rollins (1969).Google Scholar
Castaneda, H.N. (1971), ‘The Private Language Argument as a reductio ad absurdum', in Jones (1971).Google Scholar
Donellan, K. (1966), ‘Reference and Descriptions’, Philosophical Review, 75, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, A. and Jackson, F. (1971), ‘The Analogical Inference to Other Minds’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 9, 168-76.Google Scholar
Jones, O.R. (1971), ed., The Private Language Argument, Macmillan.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J.H. (1969), Modern Materialism, Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1969), ‘The Identity Approach to the Mind-Body Problem', in O'Connor (1969).Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1971), ‘The Verification Principle and the Private Language Argument', in Jones (1971).Google Scholar