Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:38:39.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Sullivan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Timothy Williamson
Timothy Williamson*
Affiliation:
Wykeham Professor of Logic, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 46 , Issue 4-5: Special Issue: Williamson on Modality , August 2016 , pp. 759 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgess, John P. 2009. Philosophical Logic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400830497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, George, and Cresswell, Max. 1996. A New Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203290644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2003. “The Interaction of Modality with Quantification and Identity.” In his Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-metaphysical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Meghan. 2016. “An A-Theory without Tense Operators.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 736–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar