No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reply to Stalnaker
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 46 , Issue 4-5: Special Issue: Williamson on Modality , August 2016 , pp. 727 - 734
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016
References
Fritz, Peter. 2015. “Propositional Contingentism.” The Review of Symbolic Logic 9: 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Peter, and Goodman, Jeremy. 2016. “Higher-order Contingentism Part 1: Closure and Generation.” Journal of Philosophical Logic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kment, Boris. 2016. “Model Theory and Contingent Existence.” Analysis 76: 172–190. 10.1093/analys/anw004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deRosset, Louis. 2016. “Modal Logic and Contingentism: A Comment on Timothy Williamson's Modal Logic as Metaphysics.” Analysis 76: 155–172. 10.1093/analys/anw005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2003. Ways a World Might Be: Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2010. “Merely possible propositions.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology, edited by Hale, Bob and Hoffman, Aviv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2012. Mere Possibilties: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2016. “Models and Reality.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4-5): 670–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552078.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016a. “Replies to King, deRosset and Kment.” Analysis 76: 201–222. 10.1093/analys/anw008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016b. “Modal Science.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4-5): 453–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2016c. “Reply to Sider.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4-5): 660–669.Google Scholar