Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:38:27.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Beehler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Joshua Cohen  and
Joel Rogers
Joshua Cohen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139, U.S.A.
Joel Rogers
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI53706, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 583 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cohen, Joshua and Rogers, Joel On Democracy (New York: Penguin 1983)Google Scholar

2 Ibid., 151

3 As here, all references to Beehler’s ‘Autonomy and the Democratic Principle’ are contained in the text.

4 As we indicated, albeit in very general terms, in Cohen and Rogers, 147-8.

5 See Rawls, John A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1971)Google Scholar; and ‘Justice as Fairness: Political, Not Metaphysical,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985), 223-51.

6 Cohen and Rogers, 152-67

7 For further elaboration, see Cohen, Joshua ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,’ in The Good Polity, Hamlin, Alan and Pettit, Philip eds. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1989), 17-34Google Scholar.

8 The seven ‘institutional requirements’ that we discuss in chapter 6 of On Democracy.