Article contents
The logical form of negative action sentences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
It is typically assumed that actions are events, but there is a growing consensus that negative actions, like omissions and refrainments, are not events, but absences thereof. If so, then we must either deny the obvious, that we can exercise our agency by omitting and refrainment, or give up on event-based theories of agency. I trace the consensus to the assumption that negative action sentences are negative-existentials, and argue that this is false. The best analysis of negative action sentences treats them as quantifying over omissions and refrainments, conceived of as events.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 2016
References
- 2
- Cited by