Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:15:54.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lexical norms, language comprehension, and the epistemology of testimony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Endre Begby*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BCV5A 1S6, Canada

Abstract

It has recently been argued (for instance by Sanford Goldberg, expanding on earlier work by Tyler Burge) that public linguistic norms are implicated in the epistemology of testimony by way of underwriting the reliability of language comprehension. This paper argues that linguistic normativity, as such, makes no explanatory contribution to the epistemology of testimony, but instead emerges naturally out of a collective effort to maintain language as a reliable medium for the dissemination of knowledge. Consequently, the epistemologies of testimony and language comprehension are deeply intertwined from the start, and there is no room for grounding the one in terms of the other.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2014 Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Jonathan. 1996. “Transmitting Knowledge.” Nous 30 (3-4): 99111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begby, Endre. 2013. “Semantic Minimalism and the ‘Miracle of Communication’.” Philosophical Studies 165 (3-4): 957973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne. 1998. “Is Verbal Communication a Purely Preservative Process?Philosophical Review 107 (3-4): 261288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel. 1992. Belief and Meaning: The Unity and Locality of Mental Content. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bilgrami Stoecker, Akeel. 1993. “Norms and Meaning.” In Reflecting Davidson, edited by , R.. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul A. 1989. “The Rule-Following Considerations.” Mind 98 (3-4): 507549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Emma. 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Reprinted in Foundations of Mind, 2007.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1993. “Content Preservation.” Philosophical Review 102 (3-4): 457488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge Hahn, Tyler. 1999. “Comprehension and Interpretation.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by , L. E.. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 2013. “Postscript to ‘Content Preservation.” In Cognition through Understanding: Philosophical Essays. Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen Lepore, Herman, and , Ernest. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, Fabrice. 2010. “To Trust or Not to Trust? Children’s Social Epistemology.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3-4): 531549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1973. “Radical Interpretation.” Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 1984.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. “Communication and Convention.” Reprinted in Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 1984.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1986. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” Reprinted in Truth, Language, and History, 2005.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1994. “The Social Aspect of Language.” Reprinted in Truth, Language, and History, 2005.Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson Hahn, Donald. 1999. “Reply to Burge.” In The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by , L. E.. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1978. “The Social Character of Meaning.” In Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 2001. Rule-Following and Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, Elizabeth. 1987. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61 (Supplementary): 5783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker Matilal, Elizabeth. 1994. “Against Gullibility.” In Knowing from Words, edited by , B. K., and Chakrabarti, A.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glüer Wikforss, Kathrin, and , Åsa Maria. 2009. “Against Content Normativity.” Mind 118 (3-4): 3170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Sanford. 2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Sanford. 2008. “Testimonial Knowledge in Early Childhood, Revisited.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3-4): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2006. “Is Meaning Normative?Mind and Language 21 (3-4): 220240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Tim. 2013. “The Informational Richness of Testimonial Contexts.” Philosophical Quarterly 63 (3-4): 5880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2006. A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein. Chesham: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 2006. “Learning from Words.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3-4): 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer. 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” Reprinted in Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, 1953.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rysiew, Patrick. 2007. “Beyond Words: Communication, Truthfulness, and Understanding.” Episteme 4 (3-4): 285304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie. 1993. “Why Believe What People Say?Synthese 94 (3-4): 429451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David. 1997. “Languages as Social Objects.” Philosophy 72 (3-4): 499524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikforss, Åsa Maria. 2001. “Semantic Normativity.” Philosophical Studies 102 (3-4): 203226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar