Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:54:23.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interventionism and Epiphenomenalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Michael Baumgartner
Michael Baumgartner*
Affiliation:
University of Konstanz, 78464Konstanz, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the central objectives Shapiro and Sober pursue in (2007) is to show that what they call the master argument for epiphenomenalism, which is a type of causal exclusion argument, fails. Epiphe nomenalism, according to the terminology adopted in (Shapiro and Sober 2007), designates the thesis that supervening macro properties (or variables or factors) have no causal influence on micro proper ties that are caused by the micro supervenience bases of those macro properties. Well-known classical exclusion arguments are designed to yield such macro-tomicro epiphenomenalism along the lines of the following reasoning: subject to the widely accepted principle of the causal closure of the physical, there exists a causally sufficient micro cause for every micro effect; if it is additionally assumed that macro properties supervene on micro properties without being identical (or reducible) to the latter and if — in light of the rareness of cases of causal overdetermination — micro effects are assumed not to be systematically overdetermined, it follows that macro properties are causally inert with respect to effects of their micro supervenience bases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2010 , pp. 359 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, M. (2009a). ‘Interdefining Causation and Intervention.’ Dialectica 63: 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, M. (2009b). ‘Interventionist Causal Exclusion and Non-Reductive Physicalism.’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. 2004. ‘Global Supervenience and Dependence.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68: 510–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontly, T. D. 2002. ‘The Supervenience Argument Generalizes.’ Philosophical Studies 109: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. 2007. ‘Emergence and Causal Powers.’ Erkenntnis 67: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. P. 1995. ‘Varieties of Supervenience.’ In Supervenience: New Essays, Savellos, E. and Yalcin, U. eds., 16–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzies, P. and H. Price. 1993. ‘Causation As a Secondary Quality.’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raatikainen, P. forthcoming. ‘Causation, Exclusion, and the Special Sciences.’ Erkenntnis. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9236-0>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Shapiro, L. forthcoming. ‘Lessons From Causal Exclusion.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00382.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. and E., Sober 2007. ‘Epiphenomenalism. The Dos and Don’ts.’ In Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics, Wolters, G. and Machamer, P. eds., 235–64. Pittsburgh: Univer sity of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Strevens, M. 2007. ‘Review of Woodward, Making Things Happen.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, M. 2008. ‘Comments on Woodward, Making Things Happen.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Re search 77: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. 2003. Making Things Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2008a. ‘Mental Causation and Neural Mechanisms.’ In Being Reduced: New Essays on Reductive Explanation and Special Science Causation, Hohwy, J. and Kallestrup, J. eds., 218–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. 2008b. ‘Response to Strevens.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar