Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:33:42.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideology, inquiry, and antiquity: a critical notice of Lloyd’s The Ideals of Inquiry: An Ancient History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Sylvia Berryman
Sylvia Berryman*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, 1866 East Mall, E370, Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaV6T 1Z1
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A discussion of Lloyd’s Tarner Lectures at Trinity College. The importance of Lloyd’s previous scholarship is characterized and these sweeping, erudite lectures are placed in the context of that scholarship. In the broadest terms, the lectures are a call to culturally and historically comparative study of human reasoning. At their heart is a comparative history of scientific theorizing from the ancients through to modern science. Lloyd rejects the positivist picture, and the view of modern and ancient science as discontinuous; he urges scholars to undertake comparative work on the ancient sciences in different traditions. This critical notice evaluates Lloyd’s view and raises several questions for further reflection.

Keywords

ancient sciencehistorical and cultural context of scientific theoriesheuristics versus deduction
Type
Critical Notice
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 242 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, S. 2010. “The Evidence for Strato of Lampsacus in Hero of Alexandria’s Pneumatica.”; In Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion, edited by Desclos, M. L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W., 277–291. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. 2012. “It Makes No Difference Optics and Natural Philosophy in Late Antiquity.”; Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 45 (3): 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuomo, S. 2000. Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gros, P. 2006. “Un probème de la science Hellénistique: le changement d'êchelle.”; In Vitruve et la Tradition des Traités d'Architecture: Fabrica et Ratiocinatio, 437–446. Rome: Publications de l'École Française de Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1990. “Theories and Practices of Demonstration in Aristotle.”; Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 6: 371–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1996. Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2004. “New Issues in the History of Ancient Science.”; In Re-Inventions: Essays on Hellenistic and Early Roman Science, Apeiron, edited by Lang, P.. Vol. 37, 9–27. Kelowna: Academic Printing and Publishing.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2006. “Is There a Future for Ancient Science?”; Principles and Practices in Ancient Greek and Chinese Science, 196–210. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. 1999. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, Reviel, and Noel, William. 2007. The Archimedes Codex: Revealing the Secrets of the World’s Greatest Palimpest. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. 1962. The Physical World of Late Anquity. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. J. 2008. “Theory and practice in Heron’s Mechanics.”; In Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution, edited by Roux, S. and Roy Laird, W., 15–49. Dordrecth: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1987. “Philoponus' Conception of Space.”; In Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science, edited by Sorabji, R., 140–153. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Tybjerg, K. 2004. “Hero of Alexandria’s Mechanical Geometry.”; In Re-Inventions: Essays on Hellenistic and Early Roman Science, Apeiron, edited by Lang, P.. Vol. 37, 29–56. Kelowna: Academic Printing and Publishing.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. 1993. “I nervi dell’ anima.”; In Galen un das Hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums, edited by Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D., 63–77. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar