Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T14:56:39.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fictionalism about musical works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Anton Killin*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy and Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, Australian National University, Acton, Australia

Abstract

The debate concerning the ontological status of musical works is perhaps the most animated debate in contemporary analytic philosophy of music. In my view, progress requires a piecemeal approach. So in this article I hone in on one particular musical work concept – that of the classical Western art musical work; that is, the work concept that regulates classical art-musical practice. I defend a fictionalist analysis – a strategy recently suggested by Andrew Kania as potentially fruitful – and I develop a version of such an analysis in line with a broad commitment to philosophical naturalism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balaguer, Mark. 2009. “Fictionalism, Theft, and the Story of Mathematics.” Philosophia Mathematica 17(2): 131162. 10.1093/philmat/nkn019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddon-Mitchell, David, and Nola, Robert. 2009. “Introducing the Canberra Plan.” In Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, edited by Braddon-Mitchell, D. and Nola, R., 120. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brock, Stuart. 2002. “Fictionalism About Fictional Characters.” Noûs 36(1): 121.Google Scholar
Brock, Stuart. 2016. “Fictionalism About Fictional Characters Revisited.” Res Philosophica 93(2): 377403. 10.11612/resphil.2016.2.93.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, John. 2004. “Mathematics and Bleak House.” Philosophia Mathematica 12(1): 1836. 10.1093/philmat/12.1.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, John, and Rosen, Gideon. 1997. A Subject with No Object. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Caplan, Ben, and Matheson, Carl. 2006. “Defending Musical Perdurantism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 46(1): 5969. 10.1093/aesthj/ayj004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1938. The Principles of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Colyvan, Mark. 2015. “Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 edition), edited by Zalta, E.. Accessed August 28, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/mathphil-indis/Google Scholar
Cox, Renée. 1986. “A Defence of Musical Idealism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 26(2): 133142. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/26.2.133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Tim. 2014. Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cray, Wesley, and Matheson, Carl. 2017. “A Return to Musical Idealism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1281323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 1989. An Ontology of Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 10.1007/978-1-349-20038-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511897498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Benjamin, and Baines, Darrin. 2016. “What is an Antique?Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74(1): 7586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David. 2004. Art as Performance. Massachusetts: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470774922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David. 2009. “Works and Performances in the Performing Arts.” Philosophy Compass 4(5): 744755. 10.1111/phco.2009.4.issue-5Google Scholar
Davies, David. 2011. Philosophy of the Performing Arts. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444343458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, David. 2017. “Descriptivism and its Discontents.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75(2): 117129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Stephen. 2001. Musical Works and Performances. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/0199241589.001.0001Google Scholar
Davies, Stephen. 2003. Themes in the philosophy of music. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Julian. 2000. “Musical Works as Eternal Types.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 40(4): 424440. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/40.4.424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Julian. 2002. “Defending Musical Platonism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 42(4): 380402. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.4.380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Julian. 2007. Works of Music. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284375.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Julian. 2008. “Musical Works: Ontology and Meta-Ontology.” Philosophy Compass 3(6): 11131134. 10.1111/phco.2008.3.issue-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, Matti. 2005. “Fiction, Indifference, and Ontology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71(3): 557579. 10.1111/phpr.2005.71.issue-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, Matti. 2011. “Fictionalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 edition), edited by Zalta, E.. Accessed April 5, 2012. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/fictionalism/Google Scholar
Field, Hartry. 1980. Science Without Numbers. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry. 1989. Realism, Mathematics, and Modality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. 2007. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works. revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1976. Languages of Art. revised ed. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Gracyk, Theodore. 1996. Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock. North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Robert. 2015. “Objects of Fiction and Objects of Thought.” In Fictional Objects, edited by Brock, S. and Everett, A., 4170. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, and Pettit, Philip. 1995. “Moral Functionalism and Moral Motivation.” The Philosophical Quarterly 45(178): 2040. 10.2307/2219846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Richard. 2005. “Moral Fictionalism.” In Fictionalism in Metaphysics, edited by Kalderon, M. E., 287313. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2005. “Review: Art as Performance.” Mind 114: 137141. 10.1093/mind/fzi137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2006. “Making Tracks: The Ontology of Rock Music.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64(4): 401414. 10.1111/jaac.2006.64.issue-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2008. “The Methodology of Musical Ontology: Descriptivism and its Implications.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 48(4): 426444. 10.1093/aesthj/ayn034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2012a. “Platonism vs Nominalism in Contemporary Musical Ontology.” In Art and Abstract Objects, edited by Mag Uidhir, C., 197219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2012b. “The Philosophy of Music.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 edition), edited by Zalta, E.. Accessed March 12, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/music/Google Scholar
Killin, Anton. 2017. “Analyzing Antiqueness: A Response to Curtis and Baines.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75(2): 195197.Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. 1983. “Platonism in Music: A Kind of Defense.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 19: 109129. 10.5840/gps19831922Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. 1987. “Platonism in Music: Another Kind of Defense.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24(3): 245252.Google Scholar
Kivy, Peter. 2002. Introduction to a Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Leng, Mary. 2005. “Revolutionary Fictionalism: A Call to Arms.” Philosophia Mathematica 13(3): 277293. 10.1093/philmat/nki016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letts, Philip. 2015. “Against Kania’s Fictionalism about Musical Works.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 55(2): 209224. 10.1093/aesthj/ayu102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold. 1980. “What a Musical Work Is.” The Journal of Philosophy 77(1): 528. 10.2307/2025596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Livingston, P. 2011. “History of the Ontology of Art.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 edition), edited by Zalta, E.. Accessed May 30, 2012. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/art-ontology-historyGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Dominic Mc Iver. 2010. A Philosophy of Computer Art. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Robert L. 1993. “Musical Works in the Worlds of Performers and Listeners.” In The Interpretation of Music: Philosophical Essays, edited by Krausz, M., 119127. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2009. “Naturalism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2009 edition), edited by Zalta, E.. Accessed June 26, 2012. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/naturalism/Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano. 2001. “Musical Ontology and the Argument From Creation.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 41(3): 279292. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/41.3.279Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. 1939. “Designation and Existence.” The Journal of Philosophy 36(26): 701709. 10.2307/2017667Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rohrbaugh, Guy. 2003. “Artworks as Historical Individuals.” European Journal of Philosophy 11(2): 177205. 10.1111/ejop.2003.11.issue-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrbaugh, Guy. 2005. “Ontology of Art.” In Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, edited by Gaut, B. and Lopes, D. M., 2nd ed, 241253. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 1990. “Modal Fictionalism.” Mind XCIX(395): 327354. 10.1093/mind/XCIX.395.327Google Scholar
Rudner, Richard. 1950. “The Ontological Status of the Esthetic Object.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10(3): 380388. 10.2307/2103271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, R. M. 2010. Fiction and Fictionalism. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1940. The Psychology of Imagination. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2001. “Hermeneutic Fictionalism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25(1): 3671. 10.1111/misp.2001.25.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert. 2009. “Methodological Questions About the Ontology of Music.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67(4): 375386. 10.1111/jaac.2009.67.issue-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen. 10.4324/9780203221303Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2006. “Debates about the Ontology of Art: What are We Doing Here?Philosophy Compass 1(3): 245255. 10.1111/phco.2006.1.issue-3Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2013. “Fictionalism versus Deflationism.” Mind 122: 10231051. 10.1093/mind/fzt055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2015. “Fictional Discourse and Fictionalisms.” In Fictional Objects, edited by Brock, S. and Everett, A., 255274. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735595.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillman, Chris. 2011. “Musical Materialism.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 51(1): 1329. 10.1093/aesthj/ayq028Google Scholar
Trivedi, Saam. 2002. “Against Musical Works as Eternal Types.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 42(1): 7382. 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.1.73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1988. “The Presentation and Portrayal of Sound Patterns.” In Human Agency: Language, Duty, and Value, edited by Dancy, J., Moravcsik, J. M. E. and Taylor, C. C. W., 237257. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1980. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen. 2001. “Go Figure: A Path Through Fictionalism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25(1): 72102. 10.1111/misp.2001.25.issue-1Google Scholar