Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:27:38.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiencing Silence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2019

Phillip John Meadows
Phillip John Meadows*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper identifies three claims that feature prominently in recent discussions concerning the experience of silence: (i) that experiences of silence are the most “negative” of perceptions, (ii) that we do not hear silences because those silences cause our experiences of silence, and (iii) that to hear silence is to hear a temporal region devoid of sound. The principal proponents of this approach are Phillips and Soteriou, and here I present a series of objections to common elements of their attempts to place these three claims within an account of experience of silence. The final section of the paper returns to the first of the three claims and argues that, in fact, there is no good reason to accept it as initially formulated. However, when properly formulated, the claim ceases to offer support for Phillips’s and Soteriou’s approach to experience of silence.

Keywords

Auditory experiencesilenceperception
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , February 2020 , pp. 238 - 250
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranyosi, István. 2013. “Silencing the Argument from Hallucination.” In Hallucination: Philosophy and Psychology, edited by MacPherson, Fiona and Platchias, Dimitris, 255–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto, and Dokic, Jerome. 2009. “Some Varieties of Spatial Hearing.” In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, edited by Nudds, Matthew and O’Callaghan, Casey, 97–110. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavedon-Taylor, Dan. 2017. “Touching Voids: On the Varieties of Absence Perception.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (2): 355–66.Google Scholar
Meadows, Philip. 2018. “In Defense of Medial Theories of Sound.” American Philosophical Quarterly 55(3): 293–302.Google Scholar
Nudds, Matthew. 2009. “Sounds and Space.” In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, edited by Nudds, Matthew and O’Callaghan, Casey, 69–96. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, Casey. 2007. Sounds: A Philosophical Theory. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Brian. 1957. “The Location of Sound,” Mind 66 (264): 471–90.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Brian. 2000. Consciousness and the World. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Brian. 2009. “The Location of a Perceived Sound.” In Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, edited by Nudds, Matthew and O’Callaghan, Casey, 111–25. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, I. (2013) “Hearing and Hallucinating Silence.” In Hallucination: Philosophy and Psychology, edited by MacPherson, Fiona and Platchias, Dimitris, 333–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tom. 2016. “A Breath of Fresh Air: Absence and the Structure of Olfactory Perception.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97(3): 400–20.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 2008. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soteriou, M. 2011. “The Perception of Absence, Space, and Time.” In Perception, Causation, and Objectivity, edited by Roessler, Johannes, Lerman, Hemdat and Eilan, Naomi, 181–206. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar