Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:09:25.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Davidson's Semantic Program1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Stephen P. Stich
Stephen P. Stich*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Donald Davidson did it. He did it slowly, deliberately, in more than a half dozen widely noted essays. What he did was to elaborate a program for the study of empirical semantics. Nor did he stop there. He went on to apply his program to some of the problems that have long bedeviled semantics: action sentences, indirect discourse and propositional attitudes.

My goal in this paper is to assess Davidson's achievement. The first step is to assemble the program from the sketches and hints scattered among Davidson's papers. This is the project of my first section where my aim is sympathetic exposition. Since Davidson sometimes seems to be playing a game of hide and seek with his reader, my reconstruction of his program and arguments is of necessity occasionally speculative. In the second section my stance turns critical. There are anomalies in the program; the sort of theory Davidson advocates is not the sort delivered. When the problems are pushed, I think the program loses whatever initial plausibility it may have had. It is my contention that Davidson has provided no serious framework for the empirical study of natural language.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 201 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am grateful to John Bennett, Brian Loar, Thomas Ricketts, Brian Skyrms, John Wallace, and James Wiezel for their helpful suggestions on the topics discussed in this paper.

References

Davidson, Donald [TMML]. “Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages,” Proceedings of the 1964 Congress for Logic, Methodology arid Philosophy of Science (Amsterdam: North Holland), 1964Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald [T&M]. “Truth and Meaning,” Synthese, 17, 1967.10.1007/BF00485035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald [LFAS]. “The Logical Form of Action Sentences,” The Logic of Decision and Action edited by Rescher, Nicholas (Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press), 1967.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald [A&R]. “Action and Reaction,” Inquiry, 13, 1970.10.1080/00201747008601604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald [Saying]. “On Saying That,” Synthese, 19, 1968. (=Words and Objections.) 10.1007/BF00568054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald [IE]. “The Individuation of Events,” Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, edited by Rescher, Nicholas et al. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 1969.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald [SNL]. “Semantics for Natural Languages,” Linguaggi nella societe e nella technica (Milano:), 1970.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald [EP]. “Events as Particular,” Nous, V, i, 1970.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin [Action]. A Theory of Human Action (Englewood Cliffs, N.).: Prentice Hall), 1970.Google Scholar
Grandy, Richard [Reference]. “Reference, Meaning and Believe,” Journal of Philosophy, LXX, 14, 1973.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon [Events]. “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations,” Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, edited by Rescher, Niçholas et al. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel), 1969.Google Scholar
Martin, Edwin [TT]. “Truth and Translation,” Philosophical Studies, 23, 1972.10.1007/BF00354735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (Word]. Word and Object (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), 1960.Google Scholar
Stich, S.P. (LFNL). “Logical Form and Natural Language,” Philosophical Studies, 28, 1975.10.1007/BF00372902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, A. (Concept]. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1956.Google Scholar