Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:22:22.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The absolutism problem in On Liberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Piers Norris Turner
Piers Norris Turner*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mill argues that, apart from the principle of utility, his utilitarianism is incompatible with absolutes. Yet in On Liberty he introduces an exceptionless anti-paternalism principle—his liberty principle. In this paper I address ‘the absolutism problem, ’ that is, whether Mill's utilitarianism can accommodate an exceptionless principle. Mill's absolute claim is not a mere bit of rhetoric. But the four main solutions to the absolutism problem are also not supported by the relevant texts. I defend a fifth solution—the competence view—that turns on his attention to decision-making structures and, in particular, on the role of expertise considerations in his account.

Keywords

John Stuart MillUtilitarianismRule-UtilitarianismLiberty Principle
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , 2013 , pp. 322 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneson, Richard. 2000. “Egalitarian Justice versus the Right to Privacy?” Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, Jeremy A. 2013. “A Psychological Defense of Paternalism.” In Paternalism: Theory and Practice, edited by Weber, Michael E. and Coons, Christian L., 197–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, David O. 2013. Mill's Progressive Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 1997. Mill on Utilitarianism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill's Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, edited by Skorupski, John, 255–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, D. P. 1979. “Justice, Liberty and the Principle of Utility in Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, edited by Cooper, Wesley Nielsen, Kai and Patten, Steven C., 63–73. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supp. Vol. V.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. 1972. “Paternalism.” The Monist 56: 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David. 2009. Democratic Authority. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 1999. Social Philosophy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1963. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David. 1976. “Mill's Theory of Morality.” Chapter 2 in Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. 1982. “Utility and Rights.” Chapter 6 in Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1832. “Pledges [2].” Vol. XXIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, Ann P. and Robson, John M., 496–504. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1834. “Mr. O'Connell's Bill for the Liberty of the Press.” Vol. VI of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 165–168. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1843. “A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive.” Vols. VII–VIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. “Principles of Political Economy.” Vols. II–III of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1852. “Whewell on Moral Philosophy.” Vol. X of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 165–201. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1859a. “On Liberty.” Vol. XVIII of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 213–310. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1859b. “Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform.” Vol. XIX of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 311–339. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1861a. “Considerations on Representative Government.” Vol. XIX of The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 371–577. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1861b. “Utilitarianism.” Vol. X of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 203–259. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1865. “Letter to James Beal.” Vol. XVI of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N., 1031–1035. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1869. “Thornton on Labour and Its Claims.” Vol. V of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 631–668. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1873. “Autobiography.” Vol. I of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 1–290. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1963–1991. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33 vols. Edited by Robson, J. M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, and Grote, George. 1837. “Taylor's Statesman.” Vol. XIX of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by Robson, J. M., 617–647. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Miller, Dale. E. 2010. J.S. Mill: Moral, Social and Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. 1998. Mill on Liberty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1997. “Introduction.” Mill: Texts, Commentaries, edited by Ryan, Alan, ix–xlv. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip. 2006. Utility & Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skorupski, John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy. 1994. “Infinite Decision Theory.” Gambling on God, edited by Jordan, Jeff, 139–160. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1980. Mill on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Piers Norris. 2013a. “Authority, Progress, and the ‘Assumption of Infallibility’ in On Liberty.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51: 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piers Norris, Turner. 2013b. “Rules and Right in Mill.” Unpublished paper. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. 2001. “Infinity in Ethics.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online, edited by Craig, Edward. London: Routledge. Retrieved 30 October 2012.Google Scholar