Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:48:36.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Darwall*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Samuel Scheffler
Samuel Scheffler*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 257 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was presented at the Seventy-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association in Boston on December 29, 1980, as a reply to Stephen Darwall's comments on my essay ‘Ethics, Personal Identity, and Ideals of the Person.’ That essay of mine and Darwall's coments on it can be found immediately preceding this paper.

References

1 ‘Scheffler on Morality and Ideals of the Person,’ this issue, 254

2 Ibid.

3 ‘Ethics, Personal Identity, and Ideals of the Person,’ this issue, 246

4 ‘Moral Scepticism and Ideals of the Person,’ The Monist, 62 (1979) 303n

5 Thus the suggestion that moral conceptions may be thought of as rooted in ideals of the person, though prompted by reflection on the actual role of morality in human life, is not intended as a purely descriptive proposal. If some culture turned out to have a system of norms of conduct which could in no way be seen as expressive of an ideal of the person, or if some traditional philosophical conception of morality were such that it embodied no ideal of the person whatsoever, that would not falsify the proposal. Rather, if the proposal were accepted, those cultural norms or philosophical conceptions would be regarded as ‘moral’ only in a degenerate sense.

6 I discuss what I take to be the more natural kind of motivation for a view like utilitarianism in The Rejection of Consequentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1982).

7 ‘Scheffler on Morality and Ideals of the Person,’ this issue, 254

8 Ibid.