Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:25:21.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychopathy and internalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Victor Kumar*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Abstract

Do psychopaths make moral judgments but lack motivation? Or are psychopaths’ judgments are not genuinely moral? Both sides of this debate seem to assume either externalist or internalist criteria for the presence of moral judgment. However, if moral judgment is a natural kind, we can arrive at a theory-neutral criterion for moral judgment. A leading naturalistic criterion suggests that psychopaths have an impaired capacity for moral judgment; the capacity is neither fully present nor fully absent. Psychopaths are therefore not counterexamples to internalism. Nonetheless, internalism is empirically problematic because it is unable to explain psychopaths’ moral deficits.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aharoni, E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., and Kiehl, K.. 2012. “Can Psychopathic Offenders Discern Moral Wrongs? A New Look at the Moral/Conventional Distinction.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121(2): 484497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björnsson, G., Eriksson, J., Strandberg, C., Olinder, R. F., and Björklund, F.. 2014. “Motivational Internalism and Folk Intuitions.” Philosophical Psychology 28(5): 715734.10.1080/09515089.2014.894431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björnsson, G., and McPherson, T.. 2014. “Moral Attitudes for Non-cognitivists: Solving the Specification Problem.” Mind 123: 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J. 1995. “A Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality: Investigating the Psychopath.” Cognition 57: 129.10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-PCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, J. 1997. “Moral Reasoning and the Child with Psychopathic Tendencies.” Personality and Individual Differences 22: 731739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, J., Jones, L., Clark, F., and Smith, M.. 1995. “Is the Psychopath ‘Morally Insane’?Personality and Individual Differences 19(5): 741752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. 1988. “How to Be a Moral Realist, ” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by Sayre-McCord, G., 181228. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. 1991. “Realism, Anti-foundationalism and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds.” Philosophical Studies 61: 127148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. 1999. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa, ” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, R. A., 141185. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brandts, J., and Schram, A.. 2001. “Cooperation and Noise in Public Goods Experiments: Applying the Contribution Function Approach.” Journal of Public Economics 79: 399427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. 2007. “What is Moral Judgment?Journal of Philosophy 104(7): 321349. 10.5840/jphil2007104716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cholbi, M. 2006. “Belief Attribution and the Falsification of Motive Internalism.” Philosophical Psychology 19(5): 607616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U.. 2004a. “Social Norms and Human Cooperation.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 185190.10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Fischbacher, U.. 2004b. “Third-party Punishment and Social Norms.” Evolution and Human Behavior 25: 6387.10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., and Gächter, S.. 2000. “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments.” American Economic Review 90: 980994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E.. 2001. “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment.” Economics Letters 71: 397404.10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00394-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1981. Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, G., and Darley, J.. 2008. “The Psychology of Meta-ethics: Exploring Objectivism.” Cognition 106: 13391366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul, ” In Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders and Development, edited bySinnott-Armstrong, W., vol. 3, 3580. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. 1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226308760.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108: 814834.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. 2003. “Moral Emotions, ” In Handbook of Affective Sciences, edited by Davidson, R., Scherer, K., and Goldsmith, H., 852870. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D. 1993. Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of Psychopaths among Us. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
Hollos, M., Leis, P., and Turiel, E.. 1986. “Social Reasoning in IJO Children and Adolescents in Nigerian Communities.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 17: 352374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, R. 2009. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauppinen, A. 2008. “Moral Internalism and the Brain.” Social Theory and Practice 34: 124. 10.5840/soctheorpract20083411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, A. 2013. “Ethics and Empirical Psychology, ” In Empirically Informed Ethics, edited by Christen, M., 279305. Springer.Google Scholar
Keil, F. 1989. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., and Stich, S.. 2007. “Two Theories of the Cognitive Architecture Underlying Morality, ” In The Innate Mind, edited by Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S., vol. 3, 348366. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., Stich, S., Haley, K., Eng, S., and Fessler, D.. 2007. “Harm, Affect, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction.” Mind and Language 22(2): 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J., and Fine, C.. 2008b. “Could There Be an Empirical Test for Internalism?” In Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, vol. 3, 217226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kennett, J., and Fine, C.. 2008a. “Internalism and the Evidence from Psychopaths and ‘Acquired Sociopaths’, ” In Moral Psychology: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, edited by Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, vol. 3, 173190. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keser, C., and van Winden, F.. 2000. “Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102: 2339.10.1111/1467-9442.00182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, V. 2014. “‘Knowledge’ as a Natural Kind Term.” Synthese 191: 439457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V. 2015. “Moral Judgment as a Natural Kind.” Philosophical Studies 172(2887): 2910.10.1007/s11098-015-0448-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V. Forthcoming-a. “The Empirical Identity of Moral Judgment, ” The Philosophical Quarterly.Google Scholar
Kumar, V. Forthcoming-b. “The Ethical Significance of Cognitive Science, ” In Current Controversies in Cognitive Science, edited by Leslie, S. and Cullen, S..Routledge.Google Scholar
Laurence, S., and Margolis, E.. 1999. “Concepts and Cognitive Science, ” In Concepts: Core Readings, edited by Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., 381. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levy, N. 2007. “The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14(1): 129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maibom, H. 2005. “Moral Unreason: The Case of Psychopathy.” Mind and Language 20(2): 237257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mant, C., and Perner, J.. 1988. “The Child’s Understanding of Commitment.” Developmental Psychology 24(3): 343351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. 2004a. Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. 2004b. “After Objectivity: An Empirical Study of Moral Judgment.” Philosophical Psychology 17: 326.10.1080/0951508042000202354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nucci, L. 1986. “Children’s Conceptions of Morality, Societal Convention and Religious Prescription, ” In Moral Dilemmas: Philosophical and Psychological Reconsiderations of the Development of Moral Reasoning, edited by Harding, C., 138174. Chicago, IL: Precedent Press.Google Scholar
Nucci, L. 2001. Education in the Moral Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nucci, L., and Turiel, E.. 1978. “Social Interactions and the Development of Social Concepts in Preschool Children.” Child Development 49: 400407. 10.2307/1128704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nucci, L., Turiel, E., and Encarnacion-Gawrych, G.. 1983. “Children’S Social Interactions and Social Concepts: Analyses of Morality and Convention in the Virgin Islands.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 14: 469487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillutla, M., and Murnighan, J.. 1996. “Unfairness, Anger and Spite.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68: 208224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2007. The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2015. “An Empirical Case for Motivational Internalism, ” In Motivational Internalism, edited by Björnsson, G., Strandberg, C., Francén Olinder, R., Eriksson, J., and Björklund, F., 6184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199367955.003.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, ” In Language, Mind and Knowledge, edited by Gunderson, K., 131193. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Railton, P. 1986. “Moral Realism.” The Philosophical Review 95: 163207. 10.2307/218558910.2307/2185589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. 2014. “The Affective Dog and Its Rational Tale.” Ethics 124: 813859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, P. Forthcoming. “The Value of Truth and the Value of Belief, ” In The Value of Truth.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1978. “Principles of Categorization, ” In Cognition and Categorization, edited by Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B., 2748. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Elrbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. 2003. “Are Ethical Judgments Intrinsically Motivational? Lessons from ‘Acquired Sociopathy’.” Philosophical Psychology 16(1): 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P. 1997. “Moralization, ” In Morality and Health, edited by Brandt, A. and Rozin, P., 379401. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. 1999. “The Process of Moralization.” Psychological Science 10: 218221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., and Singh, L.. 1999. “The Moralization of Cigarette Smoking in the United States.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 8: 321337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., and Stoess, C.. 1997. “Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The transformation of Preferences into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust.” Psychological Science 8: 6773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saver, J. L., and Damasio, A. R.. 1991. “Preserved Access and Processing of Social Knowledge in a Patient with Acquired Sociopathy Due to Ventromedial Frontal Damage.” Neuropsychologia 29: 12411249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T. 2004. Three Faces of Desire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1958. “Proper Names.” Mind 67: 166173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, D. 2011. “Psychopathy, Responsibility, and the Moral/Conventional Distinction.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 49: 99124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2014. “Do Psychopaths Refute Internalism?” In Being Amoral, edited by Schramme, T., 187207. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. 1981. “Preschool Children’s Conceptions of Moral and Social Rules.” Child Development 52: 13331336. 10.2307/1129527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. 1985. “Preschool Children’s Conceptions of Transgressions: Effects of Varying Moral and Conventional Domain-related Attributes.” Developmental Psychology 21(1): 1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, J. 1993. “Understanding of Social Rules, ” In The Development of Social Cognition: The Child as Psychologist, edited by Bennett, M., 111141. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smetana, J., and Braeges, J.. 1990. “The Development of Toddlers’ Moral and Conventional Judgments.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 36: 329346.Google Scholar
Smetana, J., Kelly, M., and Twentyman, C.. 1984. “Abused, Neglected, and Nonmaltreated Children’s Conceptions of Moral and Social-Conventional Transgressions.” Child Development 55: 277287. 10.2307/112985210.2307/1129852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. 1994. The Moral Problem. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snarey, J. 1985. “Cross-cultural Universality of Social-moral Development: A Critical Review of Kohlbergian Research.” Psychological Bulletin 97(2): 202232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, M., Smetana, J., and Kim, S.. 1987. “Korean Children’s Conceptions of Moral and Conventional Transgressions.” Developmental Psychology 23: 577582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, M. 1979. “Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology.” The Journal of Philosophy 76(12): 738753. 10.2307/2025856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strandberg, C., and Björklund, F.. 2013. “Is Moral Internalism Supported by Folk Intuitions?Philosophical Psychology 26(3): 319335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, N. 1988. “Moral Explanations.” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by Sayre-McCord, G., 229255. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Timmons, M. 1999. Morality without Foundations: A Defense of Ethical Contextualism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tisak, M. 1995. “Domains of Social Reasoning and beyond, ” In Annals of Child Development, edited by Vasta, R., vol. 11, 95130. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Tresan, J. 2006. “De Dicto Internalist Cognitivism.” Nous 40: 143165.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00604.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. 1983. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turillo, C., Folger, R., Lavelle, J., Umphress, E., and Gee, O.. 2002. “Is Virtue Its Own Reward? Self Sacrificial Decisions for the Sake of Fairness.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89: 839865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, M., and Nichols, S.. 2007. “Psychopaths and Moral Knowledge.” Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 14(2): 157162.10.1353/ppp.0.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskopf, D. 2009. “The Plurality of Concepts.” Synthese 169: 145173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yau, J., and Smetana, J.. 2003. “Conceptions of Moral, Social-conventional, and Personal Events among Chinese Preschoolers in Hong Kong.” Child Development 74: 16471658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed