No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Prenatal Injury and the Nonidentity Problem
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2021
Abstract
I argue that, given certain prominent views of personal identity and prudence, the nonidentity problem, or a very similar problem, can arise postconception. I clarify and defend this claim by considering the implications of these views for prenatal injury.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Canadian Journal of Philosophy
References
Adams, Robert. 1979. “Existence, Self-Interest, and the Problem of Evil.” Noûs 13: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynne Rudder. 1999. “What Am I?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59: 151–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonin, David. 2014. The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanigan, Jessica. Forthcoming. “The Ethics of Prenatal Injury.” Journal of Moral Philosophy. Advance Article, https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/aop/article-10.1163-17455243-BJA10059/article-10.1163-17455243-BJA10059.xml.Google Scholar
Hanser, Matthew. 1990. “Harming Future People.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19: 47–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Harman, Elizabeth. 2004. “Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating?” Philosophical Perspectives 18: 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. 2009. “Harming as Causing Harm.” In Harming Future Persons, edited by Roberts, Melinda and Dordrecht, David Wasserman., Nether.: Springer.Google Scholar
Harman, Elizabeth. 2011. “Fischer and Lamenting Nonexistence.” Social Theory and Practice 37: 129–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Paul, and Weinberg, Rivka. 2015. “Whose Problem Is Non-Identity?” Journal of Moral Philosophy 12: 699–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Frederik. 1996. “Death and Deprivation; Or, Why Lucretius’ Symmetry Argument Fails.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, Gregory. 1981. “The Paradox of Future Individuals.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 11: 93–112.Google Scholar
Liberto, Hallie. 2014. “The Exploitation Solution to the Non-Identity Problem.” Philosophical Studies 167: 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2006a. “The Lucretian Argument.” In The Good, the Right, Life and Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman, edited by McDaniel, Kris et al., 213–26. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. 2006b. “Paradoxes of Abortion and Prenatal Injury.” Ethics 116: 625–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Lukas. 2019. “What Matters in the Mirror of Time: Why Lucretius’ Symmetry Argument Fails.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97: 651–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Eric. 1997. “Was I Ever a Fetus?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Eric. 2019. “Personal Identity.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/identity-personal/.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.A. 2019. “The Nonidentity Problem.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/nonidentity-problem/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney. 1984. “Personal Identity: A Materialist’s Account.” In Personal Identity, Shoemaker, Sydney and Swinburne, Richard. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. 2013. “Morally, Should We Prefer Never to Have Existed?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 655–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, Bradford. 2007. “Are Shapes Intrinsic?” Philosophical Studies 133: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2004. “What Is It to Wrong Someone? A Puzzle about Justice.” In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by Jay Wallace, R., Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel, and Smith, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. 2020. On Being Me: A Personal Invitation to Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Rivka. 2008. “Identifying and Dissolving the Non-Identity Problem.” Philosophical Studies 137: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar