Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:51:00.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Concept of Freedom and the Human Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Alix A. Cohen
Alix A. Cohen*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is to determine whether Kant's account of freedom fits with his theory of the human sciences. Several Kant scholars have recently acknowledged a tension between Kant's metaphysics and his works on anthropology in particular. Jacobs and Kain write that ‘Kant made his intentions quite clear: he proposed a pragmatic empirical anthropology. The problem is, as commentators have noted, that it is not at all clear how these declared intentions fit with some central claims of his critical philosophy.’ Wood acknowledges the unexpected nature of Kant's anthropological endeavours: ‘The pragmatic approach to anthropology serves to indicate the great distance separating Kantian anthropology from […] what Kant's metaphysical theory of freedom and nature might lead us to expect.’ Louden actually holds that ‘Kant did not satisfactorily address these issues, and in order for [him] to do so it will be necessary to offer conjectures that occasionally go beyond his texts.’

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 113 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. 1983. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, H. 1990. Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.A. 2008a. ‘Kant's Biological Conception of History.’ Journal for the Philosophy of History 2: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.A. 2008b. ‘Kant's Answer to the Question ‘‘What is Man?’’ and its Implications for Anthropology.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 506–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fackenheim, E.L. 1956. ‘Kant's Concept of History.’ Kant-Studien 48: 381–98.Google Scholar
Frierson, P. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, P. 2005a. ‘Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 5, 7: 1–34.Google Scholar
Frierson, P. 2005b. ‘The Moral Importance of Politeness in Kant's Anthropology.’ Kantian Review 9: 105–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S. 1999. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gregor, M.J. 1974. ‘Introduction.’ In Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hatfield, G. 1998. ‘Kant and Empirical Psychology in the 18th Century.’ Psychological Science 6: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B. and Kain, P. eds. 2003. Essays on Kant's Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1910. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. the Königlich-preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 29 volumes to date. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith. China: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1983. Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History and Morals, trans. Humphrey, T.. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1987. Critique of Judgment, trans. Pluhar, W.S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Dowdell, V.L.. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1997. Lectures on Ethics, trans. Heath, P. ed. Heath, P. and Schneewind, J.B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1997. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. Hatfield, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1999. Practical Philosophy, trans. Gregor, M.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. forthcoming. Lectures on Anthropology (Friedländer), trans. Munzel, G.F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kain, P. 2003. ‘Prudential Reason in Kant's Anthropology.’ In Essays on Kant's Anthropology, Jacobs, B. and Kain, P. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larrimore, M. 2001. ‘Substitutes for Wisdom: Kant's Practical Thought and the Tradition of the Temperaments.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 39, 2: 259–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louden, R. 2000. Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, R. 2003. ‘The Second Part of Morals.’ In Essays on Kant's Anthropology, Jacobs, B. and Kain, P. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, R. 2006. ‘Applying Kant's Ethics: The Role of Anthropology.’ In A Companion to Kant, Bird, G. ed. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Makkreel, R. 1990. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, R. 2001. ‘Kant on the Scientific Status of Psychology, Anthropology, and History.’ In Kant and the Sciences, Watkins, E. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Munzel, G. F. 1999. Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riley, P. 1983. Kant's Political Philosophy. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. 1989. ‘Kant's Anti-Determinism.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89: 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturm, T. 2001. ‘Kant on Empirical Psychology: How Not to Investigate the Human Mind.’ In Kant and the Sciences, Watkins, E. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, H. 1988. Kantian Ethics and Socialism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Ward, A. 1991. ‘On Kant's Defence of Moral Freedom.’ History of Philosophy Quarterly 8: 373–86.Google Scholar
Wood, A. ed. 1984. Self and Nature in Kant's Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. ed. 1999. Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. ed. 2005. Kant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yovel, Y. 1980. Kant and the Philosophy of History. Princeton & Guildford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar