Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:09:33.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do we Learn from Argument? Toward an Account of The Logic of Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Terry M. Goode  and
John R. Wettersten
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From the pre-Socratics to the present, one primary aim of philosophy has been to learn from arguments. Philosophers have debated whether we could indeed do this, but they have by and large agreed on how we would use arguments if learning from argument was at all possible. They have agreed that we could learn from arguments either by starting with true premises and validly deducing further statements which must also be true and therefore constitute new knowledge, or that we could start from putative premises and validly deduce false consequences thereby showing that our premises were false. Our aim in this paper is to suggest a third alternative: we can learn from plausible arguments (invalid arguments which meet some other unspecified desiderata of approximation to valid arguments) through criticism of such arguments which enable us to discover new problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 673 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to Peggy Marchi and James Bell for criticism of an earlier draft of this essay.

References

1. Agassi, Joseph Towards an Historiography of Science (The Hague: Mouton 1963)Google Scholar
2. Agassi, Joseph ‘The Nature of Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics,' in Bunge, Mario ed., The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy (New York: The Free Press 1964) 139–211Google Scholar
3. Agassi, Joseph ‘Criteria for Plausible Arguments,’ Mind, 83 (1974) 406-16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Agassi, Joseph Science in Flux (Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Agassi, Joseph ‘The Lakatosian Revolution,’ in Cohen, Robert Feyerabend, P.K. and Wartofsky, M.W. eds., Essays in Memory of lmre Lakatos (Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1976)Google Scholar
6. Agassi, Joseph Towards a Rational Philosophical Anthropology (The Hague: Martinus-Nijhoff 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bartley, W.W. Ill, The Retreat to Commitment, (New York: Knopf 1964)Google Scholar
8. Bartley, W.W. Ill, ‘Rationality versus the Theory of Rationality,’ in Bunge, Mario ed., The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy (New York: The Free Press 1964) 3–31Google Scholar
9. Beardsley, Monroe The European Philosophers from Descartes to Nietzche (New York: Modern Library 1960)Google Scholar
10. Davis, Philip J. and Reuben, Hersch The Mathematical Experience (Boston: Birkhaüser 1980)Google Scholar
11. Gellner, Ernest Legitimation of Belief (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1974)Google Scholar
12. Hattiangadi, J.N. ‘The Structure of Problems’ (Part 1), Philosophy of The Social Sciences, 8 (1976) 345-65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hempel, Carl ‘Aspects of Scientific Explanation,’ in his Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York: The Free Press 1965) 331ff.Google Scholar
14. Kant, Immanuel Critique of Pure Reason (London: Macmillian & Co. Ltd. 1929)Google Scholar
15. Lakatos, lmre ‘Proofs and Refutations,’ The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 14 (1968) 1–25, 120-39, 221-45, 296-342Google Scholar
16. Lakatos, lmre ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs,' in lmre Lakatos, and Musgrave, Alan eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1970)10.1017/CBO9781139171434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Leibniz, G.W.V. Meditions on Knowledge, Truth and Ideas.Google Scholar
18. Marchi, Peggy The Methodology of Mathematical Research Programs, dissertation (London School of Economics 1972)Google Scholar
19. Marchi, Peggy ‘The Controversy between Leibniz and Bernoulli on the Nature of the Logarithms of Negative Numbers; Studia Leibnitiana-Supplementa XIII (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GmbH) 67–671.Google Scholar
20. Nakhnikian, George An Introduction to Philosophy (New York: Knopf 1967)Google Scholar
21. Popper, Karl The Open society and Its Enemies (London: G. Routledge and Sons, Ltd. 1945)Google Scholar
22. Popper, Karl ‘New Foundations for Logic; Mind, 56 (1947)Google Scholar
23. Popper, Karl The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books 1959)Google Scholar
24. Popper, Karl Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Basic Books 1962)Google Scholar
25. Russell, Bertrand A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, 2nd ed. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 1937)Google Scholar
26. Russell, Bertrand Principia Mathematica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1925)Google Scholar
27. Strawson, P.F. Introduction to Logical Theory (London: Methuen and Co. 1952)Google Scholar
28. Toulmin, Stephen The Uses of Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1969)Google Scholar
29. Unger, Peter Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1975)Google Scholar
30. Wettersten, John ‘Traditional Rationality vs. A Tradition of Criticism; A Criticism of Popper's Theory of the Objectivity of Science; Erkenntnis, 12 (1974) 329-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Wettersten, John with Agassi, Joseph ‘Rationality, Problems, Choice: Philosophica, 22 (1978)Google Scholar