Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:11:41.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Aaron Ben—Zeev, ‘Who Is A Rational Agent?’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Alan Donagan
Alan Donagan*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 663 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 References are to Aaron Ben-Zeev, ‘Who is a Rational Agent?', this issue.

2 This question is implicit in Ben-Zeev's assertion, ‘I show that … “rational” is an attainment and not a status attribute’ (648). The quotation marks surrounding 'rational’ are presumably ‘scare quotes,’ and do not signify that what is being talked about is the word and not the attribute.

3 Aristotle, ·Metaphysics K 1060 b36-1061 a7. For a pioneering exposition of Aristotle's doctrine that remains authoritative, see Owens, Joseph The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics, 2nd. edn. (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies 1963).Google Scholar ch. 3, esp. 118-23. The term ‘focal meaning’ is G.E.L. Owen's. Aristotle describes things (not linguistic expressions) as synonymous or homonymous according as the same word used to refer to them has one or more than one definition. For some cautionary considerations see Hamlyn, D.W. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 78 (1977-78) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Theory of Morality, 171. Ben-Zeev quotes from this page, but he seems to have overlooked most of what is said in it.