Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:26:29.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is Evolutionary Altruism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Elliott Sober
Elliott Sober*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI53711, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I want to clarify what biologists are talking about when they talk about the evolution of altruism. I’ll begin by saying something about the common sense concept. This familiar idea I’ll call ‘vernacular altruism.’ One point of doing this is to make it devastatingly obvious that the common sense concept is very different from the concept as it’s used in evolutionary theory. After that preliminary, I’ll describe some features of the evolutionary concept. Then I’ll conclude by briefly considering what explanatory relation might obtain between vernacular altruism and evolutionary altruism.

Although the points I’ll make are rather elementary ones, their interest is not restricted to those who have never heard of the evolutionary problem. The reason for this is that there is some amount of confusion about evolutionary altruism among evolutionary biologists themselves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 14: Philosophy & Biology , 1988 , pp. 75 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Barash, D. (1979) The Whisperings Within (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1979) ‘Causal Laws and Effective Strategies,’ Nous 13, 419-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: J. Murray [First edition]; Princeton: Princeton University Press 1981).Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Falconer, D. (1981) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (London: Longman).Google Scholar
Gould, S. and Lewontin, R. (1978) ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme,’ Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205, 581-98. Reprinted in Sober, E. ed., Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology (Cambridge: MIT Press 1984), 252-70.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1964) ‘The Genetic Evolution of Social Behavior,’ Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. (1975) ‘Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics.’ In Fox, R., ed., Biosocial Anthropology (London: Malaby Press), 37-67.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1985) Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature (Cambridge: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1951):‘The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables,’ Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 13, 238-41.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1981) The Expanding Circle (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux).Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1980) Causal Necessity (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984) The Nature of Selection (Cambridge: Bradford/MIT Press).Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1985) ‘Methodological Behaviorism, Evolution, and Game Theory.’ In Fetzer, J., ed., Sociobiology and Epistemology (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).Google Scholar
Sober, E. (forthcoming) ‘The Anatomy of Egoism.'Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971) ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,’ Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sober, E. (forthcoming) ‘Reviving the Superorganism.'Google Scholar