No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Introduction: Investigating the Mind
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

- Type
- Introduction
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 2001
References
Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia Smith. 1986. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M., and Churchland, Patricia Smith. 1983. “Stalking the Wild Epistemic Engine,” Noûs 17, 5-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Seth, and Gillett, Carl. 2001. “Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical': Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31.3, 333-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1990. “Representation and Interpretation.” In Modeling the Mind, Mohyeldin, K. A. Said, Newton-Smith, W. H., and Wilkes, K. V., eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 13-26.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1988. “Quining Qualia.” In Consciousness in Modern Science, Marcel, A. and Bisiach, E., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, reprinted in Mind and Cognition: A Reader, William Lycan, ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 519-47.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1993. “Back from the Drawing Board.” In Dennett and his Critics,Bo Dahlbom, ed. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 203-35.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1980. “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology,” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. (1981) Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225-53.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1987. PsychosemanticsL The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1994. The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and its Semantics. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Melnyk, Andrew. 1997. “How to Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism,” Journal of Philosophy 94, 622-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions,” Philosophy of Science 56,288-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul, and Putnam, Hilary. 1958. “The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, Feigl, Herbert, Scriven, Michael, and Maxwell, Grover, eds., pp. 3-36.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized,” In his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stich, Steven. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, Daniel M., and Wheatley, Thalia P.. 1999. “Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Illusion of Conscious Will,” presented at ASSC3 (the third annual conference of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness), June, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Weiskrantz, Lawrence. 1997. Consciousness Lost and Found: A Neuropsychological Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar