Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-wh4qq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T08:25:19.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Essential Tremor: Recommendations Long-Term Outcome Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

J.D. Putzke ,
R.E. Wharen, Jr. ,
A.A. Obwegeser ,
Z.K. Wszolek ,
J.A. Lucas ,
M.F. Turk  and
R.J. Uitti
J.D. Putzke
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
A.A. Obwegeser
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA and the Department of Neurosurgery University Innsbruck, Austria
Z.K. Wszolek
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
J.A. Lucas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
M.F. Turk
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
R.J. Uitti
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

Determine the efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control among individuals with essential tremor (ET).

Methods:

A clinical series of 52 consecutive individuals undergoing placement of a DBS system for treatment of ET completed an unblinded battery of subjective and objective measures at postoperative intervals of one, three, and 12 months, and annually thereafter up to three years. The assessment battery included measures of tremor and activities of daily living.

Results:

Both subjective and objective measures showed that stimulation was associated with significant improvement at nearly every postoperative interval as compared to pre-operative and stimulation 'off' ratings of activities of daily living functioning, midline tremor, contralateral upper extremity tremor, and contralateral lower extremity tremor. Ipsilateral tremor showed some improvement with stimulation, but only within the first three months. Trend analysis showed stable tremor control. Stimulation settings remained largely unchanged after the first three months. Dysarthria was more common among those with bilateral stimulation. A range of missing data estimation methods were performed, and subsequent analyses corroborated the main findings of the study.

Conclusion:

Thalamic DBS is generally a well-tolerated and effective treatment for ET. Methodological and analytical recommendations are provided for the evaluation of long-term outcome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 333 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2004

References

1.Obwegeser, AA, Uitti, RJ, Witte, RJ, et al.Quantitative and qualitative outcome measures after thalamic deep brain stimulation to treat disabling tremors. Neurosurgery 2001; 48(2):274–281.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Ondo, W, Jankovic, J, Schwartz, K, Almaguer, M, Simpson, RK.Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for refractory essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease tremor. Neurology 1998; 51(4):1063–1069.Google Scholar
3.Ondo, W, Almaguer, M, Jankovic, J, Simpson, RK.Thalamic deep brain stimulation - comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement. Arch Neurol 2001; 58(2):218–222.Google Scholar
4.Pahwa, R, Lyons, KL, Wilkinson, SB, et al.Bilateral thalamic stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor. Neurology 1999; 53(7):1447–1450.Google Scholar
5.Taha, JM, Janszen, MA, Favre, J.Thalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of head, voice, and bilateral limb tremor. J Neurosurg 1999; 91(1):68–72.Google Scholar
6.Troster, AI, Fields, JA, Pahwa, R, et al.Neuropsychological and quality of life outcome after thalamic stimulation for essential tremor. Neurology 1999; 53(8):1774–1780.Google Scholar
7.Carpenter, MA, Pahwa, R, Miyawaki, KL, et al.Reduction in voice tremor under thalamic stimulation. Neurology 1998; 50(3):796–798.Google Scholar
8.Starr, PA, Vitek, JL, Bakay, RAE.Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1998; 9(2):381–402.Google Scholar
9.Krauss, JK, Simpson, RK, Ondo, WG, et al.Concepts and methods in chronic thalamic stimulation for treatment of tremor: technique and application. Neurosurgery 2001; 48(3):535–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Mobin, F, De Salles, AAF, Behnke, EJ, Frysinger, R.Correlation between MRI-based stereotactic thalamic deep brain stimulation electrode placement, macroelectrode stimulation and clinical response to tremor control. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72(2-4):225–232.Google Scholar
11.Obwegeser, AA, Uitti, RJ, Turk, MF, Strongosky, AJ, Wharen, RE.Thalamic stimulation for the treatment of midline tremors in essential tremor patients. Neurology 2000; 54(12):2342–2344.Google Scholar
12.Vesper, J, Funk, T, Kern, BC, et al.Thalamic deep brain stimulation: present state of the art. Neurosurgery Quarterly 2000; 10(4):252–260.Google Scholar
13.Limousin, P, Speelman, JD, Gielen, F, Janssens, M.Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation in parkinsonian and essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66(3):289–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Benabid, AL, Pollak, P, Gao, DM, et al.Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 1996; 84(2):203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Louis, ED, Ford, B, Lee, H, Andrews, H, Cameron, G.Diagnostic criteria for essential tremor: a population perspective. Arch Neurol 1998; 55(6):823–828.Google Scholar
16.Obwegeser, AA, Uitti, RJ, Turk, MF, et al.Simultaneous thalamic deep brain stimulation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76(1):87–89.Google Scholar
17.Fahn, S, Tolosa, E, Marin, C.Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic, J, Tolosa, E, (Eds.) Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1993: 271–280.Google Scholar
18.Rehncrona, S, Johnels, B, Widner, H, et al.Long-term efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: double-blind assessments. Mov Disord 2003; 18(2):163–170.Google Scholar
19.Benabid, AL, Benazzouz, A, Gao, DM, et al.Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus and of other nuclei as a treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Techniques in Neurosurgery 1999; 5(1):5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Hariz, MI, Shamsgovara, P, Johansson, F, Hariz, GM, Fodstad, H.Tolerance and tremor rebound following long-term chronic thalamic stimulation for parkinsonian and essential tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72(2-4):208–218.Google Scholar
21.Koller, WC, Lyons, KE, Wilkinson, SB, Troster, AI, Pahwa, R.Long-term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor. Mov Disord 2001; 16(3):464–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Kumar, K, Kelly, M, Toth, C.Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for control of tremors in Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999; 72(1):47–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed