Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:13:12.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seizure Control After Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve: Clinical Outcome Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Currently, decreases in seizure frequency are the accepted efficacy outcome measure of therapeutic interventions in the management of patients with epilepsy. In a longitudinal randomized controlled trial of 10 subjects with intractable complex partial seizures who received left vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) to control seizures, it was found that the total number of consecutive seizure-free days is a significant efficacy outcome measure. Unlike measures in which percentage decreases in seizure frequency are calculated, measures of consecutive seizure days indicate improvement in the amount of time for which patients may function at a higher level in activities of daily living.

Methods:

Fourteen day blocks of consecutive seizure-free days and 14 day blocks of consecutive days in which subjects had seizures were tabulated.

Results:

A Pearson correlation coefficient showed that prior to VNS subjects had few, if any, seizure free blocks of time and after VNS they had more blocks of time seizure free r = -1.00 and r = -0.99. The blocks of seizure-free days increased tenfold (x̄ 0.85 to x̄ 8.00) from 1991-1995 while mean seizure frequency in those blocks in which subjects had seizures only decreased from (x̄ 20.14 to x̄ 17.59) for the same time period. Correlations between total number of seizures after 24 months of VNS and after 50 months of VNS were r = 0.85 showing a consistency in the effect of VNS.

Conclusions:

Monitoring the number of consecutive seizure-free days is a significant clinical outcome measure of VNS.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 222 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1997

References

REFERENCES

1.Bailey, P, Bremer, F. A sensory cortical representation of the vagus nerve with a note on the effects of low blood pressure on the cortical electrogram. J Neurophysiol 1938; 1: 405–412.Google Scholar
2.Zanchetti, A, Wang, SC, Moruzzi, G. The effect of vagal stimulation on the EEG pattern of the cat. Electroencyphalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1952; 4: 357–361.Google Scholar
3.Chase, MH, Nakamura, Y. Cortical and Sub cortical EEG patterns of response to afferent abdominal vagal stimulation: neurographic correlates. Physiol Behav 1968; 3: 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Puizillot, JJ, Foutz, AS. Vago-aortic nerves stimulation and REM sleep: evidence for REM-triggering and REM maintenance factor. Brain Res 1976; 111: 181–184.Google Scholar
5.Puizillot, JJ. Nayau du faisccau solitaire, serotonine et regulation de la vigilance. Rev Electroencephalogr Neuro-physiol Clin 1986; 1695: 106.Google Scholar
6.Penaloza Rojas, JH. Electroencephalographic synchronization resulting from direct current application to the vagus nerve. Exp Neurol 1964; 9: 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Stoica, I, Tudor, I. Vagal trunk stimulation influences on epileptic spiking focus activity. Rev Roum Neurol 1967; 4: 287–295.Google Scholar
8.Stoica, I, Tudor, I. Effects of vagus afferents on strych-ninic focus of coronal gyrus. Rev Roum Neurol 1968; 5: 203–210.Google Scholar
9.Woodbury, DM, Woodbury, JW. Effects of vagal stimulation and Experimentally-induced seizures in rats. Epilepsia 1990; 31 (Suppl. 2): S7–S20.Google Scholar
10.Zabara, J. Time course of seizure control to brief, repetitive stimuli. Epilepsia 1985; 26: 518.Google Scholar
11.Lockard, JS, Congdon, WC, Ducharme, LL. Feasibility and safety of Vagal Stimulation: the monkey model. Epilepsia 1990; 31 (Suppl. 2): S20-6.Google Scholar
12.Penry, JK, Dean, JC. Prevention of intractable partial seizures by intermittent vagal stimulation in humans: preliminary results. Epilepsia 1990; 31 (Suppl. 2): S40-S44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Uthman, BM, Wilder, BJ, Penry, JK, et al. Treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve. Neurology 1993; (43) 1338–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.George, R, Salinsky, M, Kuzniecky, R, et al. and the First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Epilepsia 1994; 35(3): 637–643.Google Scholar
15.Naritoku, DK. Vagus Nerve stimulation: continuation rates as a measure of therapeutic outcome - results from four studies. AES Proceedings. Epilepsia 1995; 36(4): 157.Google Scholar