Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:18:06.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Stereotactic Cyst Aspiration for Glial and Metastatic Brain Tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Ajay Niranjan
Affiliation:
The Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Timothy Witham
Affiliation:
The Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Douglas Kondziolka
Affiliation:
The Departments of Neurological Surgery, Radiation Oncology, and The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
L. Dade Lunsford
Affiliation:
The Departments of Neurological Surgery, Radiation Oncology, and Radiology, and The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To evaluate the role of stereotactic cyst aspiration in the context of multimodality management of cystic glial and metastatic tumors, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with 38 patients during a 10-year interval.

Methods:

All 38 patients had one or more computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging guided stereotactic cyst aspirations. Twenty-seven patients had glial neoplasms and 11 had metastatic brain tumors. Twenty-two patients underwent cyst aspiration as the initial treatment modality while 15 patients had cyst aspiration following previous treatments.

Results:

In the immediate postoperative period, 19 of the 27 (70%) patients with gliomas and nine of the 11 (82%) patients with metastatic tumors experienced symptomatic improvement. No procedure-related morbidity was encountered. Twelve patients (31.5%) eventually required a catheter-reservoir system. Thirty-seven percent of patients with cystic glial neoplasms and 18% of patients with metastatic tumors had delayed cytoreductive surgery by craniotomy subsequent to stereotactic cyst aspiration. Reduction in tumor volume following aspiration facilitated Gamma knife radiosurgery in seven patients.

Conclusion:

Single stereotactic aspiration is a low risk procedure that provides immediate relief of symptoms in patients with cystic brain tumors. It appears to be valuable together with the use of other therapeutic strategies.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Objectif:

Dans le but d’éluer le rôde l’aspiration stéotaxique de kystes dans le contexte du traitement multimodal de tumeurs kystiques gliales et méstatiques, nous avons procé àne revue réospective de notre expéence chez 38 patients sur une péode de dix ans.

Méodes:

Les 38 patients ont eu une ou plusieurs aspirations de kystes sous guidage stéotaxique par tomodensitoméie ou par RMN. Vingt-sept patients avaient une nélasie gliale et 11 avaient des tumeurs cébrales méstatiques. Vingt-deux patients ont subi une aspiration de leur kyste comme traitement initial alors que 15 patients ont subi une aspiration suite àne autre modalitéhépeutique.

Réltats:

Dans la péode postopétoire imméate, 19 des 27 patients porteurs d’un gliome (70%) et 9 des 11 patients porteurs de tumeurs méstatiques (82%) ont eu une améoration de leurs symptô. Il n’y a pas eu de morbiditéssociéàa procére. Douze patients (31.5%) ont éntuellement eu besoin d’un systè cathér/rérvoir. Trente-sept pourcent des patients porteurs de nélasies gliales kystiques et 18% des patients porteurs de tumeurs méstatiques ont éntuellement subi une chirurgie cytoréctrice par crâotomie suite à’aspiration stéotaxique de kystes. La diminution du volume de la tumeur suite à’aspiration a facilitéa radiochirurgie Gamma-Knife chez 7 patients.

Conclusion:

L’aspiration stéotaxique unique est une procére àaible risque qui amè un soulagement imméat des symptô chez les patients porteurs de tumeurs cébrales kystiques. Cette procére semble êe utile en association avec d’autres stratées thépeutiques.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2000

References

1. Poisson, M, Philippon, J, Effenterer, Racadot, J, Sichez, JP. Cerebral pseudocysts following chemotherapy of glioblastomas. Acta Neurochir 1977;39:143149.Google Scholar
2. Hood, TW, McKeever, PE. Stereotactic management of cystic gliomas of the brain stem. Neurosurgery 1989;24:373378.Google Scholar
3. Strugar, JG, Criscuolo, GR, Rothbart, D, Harrington, WN. Vascular endothelial growth/permeability factor expression in human glioma specimens: correlation with vasogenic brain edema and tumor-associated cysts. J Neurosurg 1995;83:682689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Lohle, PNM, Verhagen, THJ, Teelken, AW, Blaauw, EH, Go, KG. The pathogenesis of cerebral gliomatous cysts. Neurosurgery 1992;30:180185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Fox, JL. Intermittent drainage of intracranial cyst via the subcutaneous Ommaya reservoir. J Neurosurg 1967;27:272273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Mann, KS, Yue, CP, Ong, GB. Percutaneous sump drainage: a palliation for oft-recurring intracranial cystic lesions. Surg Neurol 1983;19:8690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Rogers, LR, Barnett, G. Percutaneous aspiration of brain tumor cysts via the Ommaya reservoir system. Neurology 1990;41:279282.Google Scholar
8. Voges, J, Schroder, R, Treuer, H, et al. CT-guided and computer assisted stereotactic biopsy: technique, results, indications. Acta Neurochir 1993;125:142149.Google Scholar
9. Apuzzo, MLJ, Chandrasoma, PT, Cohen, D, Zee, CS, Zelman, V. Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses. Neurosurgery 1987;6:930937.Google Scholar
10. Kelly, PJ. Stereotactic biopsy and resection of thalamic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 1989; 25:185195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Ostertag, CB, Mennel, HD, Kiessling, M. Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors. Surg Neurol 1980;14:275283.Google Scholar
12. Verhagen, THJ, Zeilstra, DJ, Go, KG. Differential diagnosis of supratentorial cystic intracranial lesions by CT-scanning. Br J Neurol 1987; 1:447454.Google Scholar
13. Mercuri, S, Russo, A, Palma, L. Hemispheric supratentorial astrocytomas in children. Long-term results in 29 cases. J Neurosurg 1981;55:170173.Google Scholar
14. Tomita, T, McLove, D, Naidich, T. Mural tumors with cysts in the cerebral hemisphere of children. Neurosurgery 1986;19:9981005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Palma, L, Guidetti, B. Cystic Pilocytic astrocytomas of the cerebral hemisphere. J Neurosurg 1985; 62:811815.Google Scholar
16. Frankel, SA, German, WJ. Glioblastoma multiforme: review of pathology of 219 cases with regard to natural history, pathology, diagnostic methods, and treatment. J Neurosurg 1958;15:489503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Afra, D, Norman, D, Levine, VA. Cysts in malignant gliomas. Identification by computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1980;53:821825.Google Scholar
18. Loftus, CM, Copland, BR, Carmel, PW. Cystic supratentorial gliomas: natural history and evaluation of modes of surgical therapy. Neurosurgery 1985;17:1924.Google Scholar
19. Coffey, RJ, Lunsford, LD. Stereotactic surgery for mass lesions of the midbrain and pons. Neurosurgery 1985;17:1218.Google Scholar
20. Willis, RA. Secondary tumors. In: Minckler, J ed. Pathology of the Nervous System. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971:21782196.Google Scholar
21. Flickinger, JC, Kondziolka, D, Lunsford, LD. Radiosurgery management of brain metastases from systemic cancer. In: Lunsford, LD, Kondziolka, D, Flickinger, JC eds. Gamma Knife Brain Surgery. Basal: Karger, 1998: 145159.Google Scholar
22. Kondziolka, D, Flickinger, JC, Bissonette, DJ, Bozik, M, Lunsford, LD. Survival benifit of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with malignant glial neoplasms. Neurosurgery 1997;41:776785.Google Scholar
23. Somaza, S, Kondziolka, D, Lunsford, LD, et al. Early outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for growing pilocytic astrocytomas in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 1996;25:109115.Google Scholar