Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:47:58.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of Cerebral Palsy in Alberta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Charlene M.T. Robertson*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta and Neonatal and Infant Follow-up Clinic, Glenrosc Rehabilitation Hospital, Halifax, Canada
Lawrence W. Svenson
Affiliation:
Population Health Research and Monitoring Unit, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Halifax, Canada
Michel R. Joffres
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
*
Neonatal and Infant Follow-up Clinic, Glenrosc Rehabilitation Hospital, 10230 - 111 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta , Canada T5G 0B7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

In spite of scattered reports to the contrary, concern is continually expressed that the frequency of cerebral palsy has not decreased with modern perinatal/neonatal care. Overall, epidemiological information on cerebral palsy is scant. The generally accepted prevalence is 2 to 2.5 per thousand school-age children.

Methods:

A population-based record linkage study of a presently living cohort of 96,359 children born from April, 1985 through March, 1988 and followed over an eight-year tracking period captured the diagnostic codes for all fee-for-service physician claims, all hospital separations and individual birth data from the Department of Vital Statistics of the Government of Alberta. The ICD-9 code "343" was used to identify subjects. The childhood prevalence and frequency by birthweight- specific sub-groups of cerebral palsy were determined.

Results:

Two hundred and forty-eight living children with confirmed cerebral palsy after age three years (congenital, 229 [92.3%]; probable acquired 19 [7.7%]) were identified giving an overall prevalence of 2.57 per 1000. Seventy percent were diagnosed before their third birthday. Cohort prevalence of cerebral palsy for low birthweight children (< 2500 grams) was 17.7, very low birthweight (< 1500 grams), 78.5; and extremely low birthweight (< 1000 grams), 98.4. Low birthweight children made up just over one-third of cases in this study.

Conclusions:

Cerebral palsy continues to affect a significant number of children suggesting the prevalence of cerebral palsy has not decreased. The proportion of affected children with low birthweight in this study is less than that reported in the literature.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Bax, TCO. Terminology and classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1964; 6: 295297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Nelson, KB, Ellenberg, JH. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Adv Neurol 1978; 19:421435.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Paneth, N, Kiely, J. The frequency of cerebral palsy: a review of population studies in industrialized nations since 1950. In: Stanley, F, Alherman, E, eds. The Epidemiology of the Cerebra Palsies. London, England: Spastics International Medical Publications, 1984; 4656.Google Scholar
4.Alberman, A. Describing the cerebral palsies: methods of classifying and counting. In: Stanley, F, Alberman, E, eds. The Epidemiology of the Cerebral Palsies. London, England: Spastics International Medical Publications, 1984; 2731.Google Scholar
5.Evans, P, Johnson, A, Mutch, L, Alherman, E. Report of a meeting on the standardization of the recording and reporting of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 28: 547548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Evans, PM, Alherman, E. Recording motor defects of children with cerebral palsy, [letter] Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 401406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Nelson, KB, Elienberg, JH. Children who “outgrew” cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1982;69:529536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Blair, E, Stanley, FJ. Interobserver agreement in the classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 615–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Watt, M-J, Robertson, CMT, Grace, MGA. Early prognosis for ambulation of intensive care survivors with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 766773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Stanley, FJ, Blair, E. Cerebral palsy. In: Pless, IB, ed. The Epidemiology of Childhood Disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994; 473497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Stanley, FJ, Blair, E. Why have we failed to reduce the frequency of cerebral palsy? Med J of Aust 1991; 154: 623626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Murphy, CC, Yeargin-Allsopp, M, Decoufle, P, Drews, CD. Prevalence of cerebral palsy among ten-year-old children in metropolitan Atlanta, 1985 through 1987. J Pediatrics 1993; 123: S13-S20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Cummins, SK, Nelson, KB, Grether, JK, Velie, EM. Cerebral palsy in four northern California counties, births 1983 through 1985. J Pediatrics 1993; 123: 230237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Rosen, MG, Dickson, JC. The incidences of cerebral palsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167:417423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Bhushan, V, Paneth, N, Kiely, JL. Impact of improved survival of very low birthweight on recent secular trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 10941100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Hagberg, B, Hagberg, G, Zetterstrom, R. Decreasing perinatal mortality – increase in cerebral palsy morbidity? Acta Paediatr Scand 1989; 78: 664670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Pharoah, POD, Cooke, RWI, Rosenbloom, L. Birthweight specific trends in cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child 1990; 65: 602606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Stanley, FJ. Cerebral palsy trends – implications for perinatal care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Escobar, GJ, Littenberg, B, Petitti, DB. Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:204211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Robertson, C, Sauve, R, Christianson, H. Province-based study of neurologic disability among survivors weighing 500 through 1249 grams at birth. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 636640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Perinatal and Neonatal Statistics in Alberta. Reproductive Care Committee, Alberta Medical Association, Edmonton, Alberta, 1987: 15.Google Scholar
22.Perinatal and Neonatal Statistics in Alberta. Reproductive Care Committee, Alberta Medical Association, Edmonton, Alberta, 1988: 13.Google Scholar
23.World Health Assembly under Article 23 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization. Off Rec Wid Hlth Org 1950; 28: 17, 1967; 160: 11 and Annex 18, and 1976; 233: 18.Google Scholar
24.International Classification of Diseases 1975 revision. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Iniuries, and Causes of Death, 9th Revision, 1977; 1: 215228.Google Scholar
25.Krögeloh-Mann, I, Hagberg, G, Meisner, C, et al. Bilateral spastic cerebral palsy – a comparative study between South-West Germany and Western Sweden II: Epidemiology. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994; 36: 473483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hagberg, B, Hagberg, G, Olow, I. The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VI. Prevalence and origin during the birth year period 1983–1986. Acta Paediatr Scand 1993; 82: 387-–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Riikonen, R, Raumanirta, S, Sinovuori, F, Sepala, T. Changing pattern of cerebral palsy in the southwest region of Finland. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989;78:581587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Dowding, VM, Barry, C. Cerebral palsy: changing patterns of birthweight and gestational age (1976/81). lr Med J 1988; 81: 2529.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Takeshita, K, Ando, Y, Ohtani, K, Takashima, S. Cerebral palsy in Tottori, Japan. Benefits and risks of progress in perinatal medicine. Neuroepidemiology 1989; 8: 184192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Meberg, A. Declining incidence of low birth weight – impact on perinatal mortality and incidence of cerebral palsy. J Perinatal Med 1990; 18: 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Stanley, FJ, Watson, J. Trends in perinatal mortality and cerebral palsy in Western Australia, 1967 to 1985. Br Med J 1992; 304: 16581663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Stanley, FJ. Survival and cerebral palsy in low birthweight infants: implications for perinatal care. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol 1992;6:298310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Boyle, CA, Decoufle, P, Yeargin-Allsopp, M. Prevalence and health impact of developmental disabilities in US children. Pediatrics 1994; 93(3): 399403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Pharoah, POD, Piatt, MJ, Cooke, T. The changing epidemiology of cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75: F169-F173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Patterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. Br Med J 1993; 307: 12391243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Grether, JK, Nelson, KB, Cummins, SK. Twinning and cerebral palsy: experience in four northern California counties, births 1983 through 1985. Paediatrics 1993; 92: 854858.Google ScholarPubMed
37.Pharoah, POD, Cooke, T. Cerebral palsy and multiple births. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75: F174-F177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Williams, K, Hennessy, E, Alberman, . Cerebral palsy: effects of twinning, birthweight, and gestational age. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75: F178-F198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Blair, E, Stanley, F. Intrauterine growth and spastic cerebral palsy I – Association with birth weight for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162:229237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Stanley, F, Blair, E. Postnatal risk factors among the cerebral palsies. In: Stanley, F, Alberman, E, eds. The Epidemiology of the Cerebral Palsies. London, England: Spastics International Medical Publications, 1984: 135149.Google Scholar
41.Volpe, JJ, Value of MR in definition of the neuropathology of cerebral palsy in vivo. Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13: 7983.Google ScholarPubMed
42.Murphy, DJ, Hope, PL, Johnson, A. Neonatal risk factors for cerebral palsy in very preterm babies: case-controlled study. Br Med J 1997; 314(7078): 404408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Fair, M, Cyr, M. The Canadian Birth Data Base: a new research tool to study reproductive outcomes. Health Reports 1993; 5: 281320.Google Scholar
44.Gill, GE, Baldwin, JA. Methods and technology of record linkage: some practical considerations. In: Baldwin, JA, Acheson, ED, Graham, WJ, eds. Textbook of Medical Record Linkage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987; 3954.Google Scholar
45.Gill, J, Goldacre, M, Simmons, H, Bettley, G, Griffith, M. Computerized linking of medical records: methodological guidelines. J Epidemiol and Community Health 1993; 47: 326330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Stanley, FJ, Croft, ML, Gibbons, J, Read, AW. A population database for maternal and child health research in Western Australia using record linkage. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol 1994; 8: 433447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Bell, RM, Kelsey, J, Richards, T. The urge to merge: linking vital statistics records and medicard claims. Medical Care 1994; 32: 10041018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Rothman, KJ. Measures of disease frequency. In: Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1986: 2324.Google Scholar
49.Pharoah, POD. Incidence and prevalence in cerebral palsy, [letter] Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 1069: 1074.Google Scholar