Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:46:32.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P.074 Assessing the emergence and evolution of artificial intelligence and machine learning research in neuroradiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2024

SS Haile
Affiliation:
(Toronto)*
A Boutet
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
AZ Wang
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
H Son
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
M Malik
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
V Pai
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
M Nasralla
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
J Germann
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
A Vetkas
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
F Khalvati
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
BB Ertl-Wagner
Affiliation:
(Toronto)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has been growing in neuroradiology, but there is limited knowledge on how this interest has manifested into research and the field’s trends, challenges, and future directions. Methods: The American Journal of Neuroradiology was queried for original research articles published since inception (Jan. 1, 1980) to Sept. 19, 2022 that contained any of the following key terms: “machine learning”, “artificial intelligence”, or “radiomics”. Articles were screened, categorized into Statistical Modelling (Type 1), AI/ML Development (Type 2), or End-user Application (Type 3) and then bibliometrically analyzed. Results: A total of 124 articles were identified with 85% being non-integration focused (Type 1 n = 41, Type 2 n = 65) and the remaining (n = 18) being Type 3. The total number of articles published grew two-fold in the last five years, with Type 2 articles mainly driving this growth. While most (66%) Type 2 articles were led by a radiologist with 55% possessing a postgraduate degree, a minority of Type 2 articles addressed bias (15%) and explainability (20%). Conclusions: The results of this study highlight areas for improvement but also strengths that stakeholders can consider when promoting the shift towards integrating practical AI/ML solutions in neuroradiology.

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation