Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:09.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Message from the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

James A. Sharpe
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1999

References

1. Sharpe, JA. A quarter century of publication. Can J Neurol Sci 1998; 25:1 4.Google Scholar
2. Guidelines on authorship. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Brit Med J 1985; 291(6497): 722.Google Scholar
3. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann of Int Med 1997; 126(1): 36 47.Google Scholar
4. Sharpe, JA. Message from the Editor. Can J Neurol Sci 1992: 19: xvii.Google Scholar
5. van Rooyen, S, Godlee, F, Evans, S, Smith, R, Black, N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1998; 280(3): 234 237.Google Scholar
6. Godlee, F, Gale, CR, Martyn, CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280(3): 237 240.Google Scholar
7. Justice, AC, Cho, MK, Winker, MA, et al. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280(3): 240 242.Google Scholar
8. Cho, MK. Justice, AC. Winker, MA. et al. Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? JAMA. 1998; 280(3): 243 245.Google Scholar