Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:49:16.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mercury and Movement Disorders: The Toxic Legacy Continues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Jacky Ganguly
Affiliation:
London Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Dinkar Kulshreshtha
Affiliation:
London Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
Mandar Jog*
Affiliation:
London Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
*
Correspondence to: Mandar Jog, London Movement Disorder Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Mercury (Hg) exists in the environment as inorganic (metallic Hg vapor, mercurous and mercuric salts) or organic (bonded to a structure containing carbon atoms) forms. Neurotoxic effect of Hg is known for years. While the organic form (methylmercury (meHg)) led to the Minamata incidence in Japan and “wonder-wheat” disaster in Iraq, the “mad hatters” and “Danbury shakes” were related to the inorganic elemental form (Hg vapor). Human exposure to toxic Hg continues in the modern world to a large extent by artisanal gold mining, biomass combustion, chloralkali production, and indigenous medicine use to name a few. Heavy industrial use of Hg contaminates air and landfills, affecting the aquatic ecosystem and marine food chain. A detailed social and occupational history with a high index of clinical suspicion is required to not miss this toxic etiology for movement disorders like ataxia, tremor, or myoclonus. In this review, we have discussed the past and present global health impact of Hg from a movement disorder perspective. The connection of Hg with neurodegeneration and autoimmunity has been highlighted. We have also discussed the role of chelating agents and the preventive strategies to combat the neurotoxic effects of Hg in the modern world.

Résumé :

RÉSUMÉ :

Mercure et troubles du mouvement : un héritage toxique toujours présent.

Le mercure existe dans la nature sous forme inorganique (par exemple des vapeurs de mercure métallique, des sels mercuriques ou des sels mercurieux) ou organique quand il est lié à une structure contenant des atomes de carbone. L’effet neurotoxique du mercure est connu depuis de nombreuses années. Alors qu’une forme organique (le méthyl-mercure) a conduit à une vaste contamination dans la ville japonaise de Minamata et est responsable de la contamination de semences de blé distribuées en Iraq, les syndromes des « chapeliers fous » et de Danbury étaient liés à une forme élémentaire inorganique (des vapeurs de mercure). Dans le monde moderne, l’exposition humaine au mercure se poursuit dans une large mesure, pour ne citer que quelques exemples, par l’extraction artisanale de l’or, la combustion de la biomasse, la production de chlore et de soude et le recours à des médecines indigènes. On le sait, l’utilisation industrielle lourde du mercure contamine l’air et les décharges, ce qui affecte en retour l’écosystème aquatique et la chaîne alimentaire marine. Chose certaine, une histoire détaillée des sociétés et des professions, de même qu’une excellente capacité de discernement clinique, sont nécessaires pour ne pas négliger l’étiologie toxique de troubles du mouvement tels que l’ataxie, les tremblements ou les myoclonies. Dans cet article, nous avons voulu discuter de l’impact passé et actuel du mercure sur la santé mondiale du point de vue des troubles du mouvement. Nous avons ainsi mis en évidence le lien existant entre le mercure et la neuro-dégénérescence et l’auto-immunité. Nous avons également discuté du rôle des agents chélateurs et des stratégies préventives pour combattre les effets neurotoxiques du mercure dans le monde moderne.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation

Introduction

Mercury (Hg) is a nonessential element for the human body. Hg is emitted into the environment and released into landfill and water systems from anthropogenic activities or natural sources. Expanded industrial use of Hg has exposed a large population to its neurotoxic effects. Hg exists as elemental (vapor), inorganic (mercuric salts, when elemental mercury combines with sulfur, chlorine), and organic salts (when elemental mercury combines with carbon, e.g. methylmercury (meHg)). Reference Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Kazemi and Moghadamnia1 Elemental mercury affects humans via occupational (Hg vapor) or environmental exposure (air pollution), whereas MeHg comes mainly from the aquatic marine food chain. As our society has advanced, modes of human exposure to Hg have changed, but it is still very much relevant and necessary not to forget this as a risk factor for movement disorders like cerebellar ataxia, tremor, and myoclonus. Failure to recognize this toxic etiology often leads to unnecessary investigations and misdiagnosis. There is also evidence suggestive of the possible link of Hg with parkinsonism and autoimmune movement disorders. The studies on Hg and movement disorders have investigated heterogeneous patient populations with a diverse source of exposure. In this review, we have consolidated the literature on human exposure to Hg and movement disorders, along with their pathophysiological basis and the preventive strategies.

Literature Search

The literature search was conducted using four databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and BioMed Central (January 1930 to December 2020) using keywords “mercury and neurology”, “mercury and movement disorders”, “mercury and tremor”, “mercury and ataxia”, and “mercury and parkinsonism”. Duplicates were removed. Articles highlighting mainly the movement disorder perspective from human exposure to Hg were included. A consolidated overview has been extracted from them and presented in this review.

In the following sections, we have first discussed biochemical properties of Hg and pathophysiology of neurotoxicity, followed by major sources of human exposure and movement disorders related to Hg exposure.

Biochemistry and Pathophysiology

Elemental mercury (Hg0) vaporizes at room temperature and enters into the body via an inhalational route. It can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to cause neurotoxicity. In the bloodstream, Hg0 is oxidized to mercuric ion (Hg2+) by the catalase enzyme. Hg2+ by itself cannot cross the BBB, though it can interact with intracellular enzymes, transporters, ion channels, and glutathione and paralyze the detoxification machinery. Urine and feces are the main excretory routes for elemental mercury. Reference Martinez-Finley and Aschner2,Reference Clarkson, Vyas and Ballatori3 Organic MeHg, on the other hand, intoxicates the marine ecosystem and affects humans mainly via the aquatic food chain. MeHg is almost 95% absorbed from the intestine. Subsequently, it forms complexes with thiol (-SH) and selenol (-SeH) groups and circulates to various organs including the central nervous system. MeHg-L-cysteine complex is transported across the BBB by the L-type amino acid transporters and is the main culprit for neurotoxic effects. Reference Clarkson, Vyas and Ballatori3 In the brain, glutathione complexes with MeHg for detoxification. MeHg complex gets excreted through the bile, kidney, and finally as mercuric Hg via feces [Figure 1]. Human exposure to elemental and organic mercury is highlighted in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Uptake and transport of mercury in the body.

Figure 2: Human exposure to elemental and organic mercury.

MeHg-induced neurotoxicity is mainly related to four interrelated cellular events: (i) affection of GSH antioxidant system; (ii) glutamate dyshomeostasis; (iii) Ca2+ dyshomeostasis; and (iv) increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and oxidative stress. Reference Farina, Rocha and Aschner4 MeHg is highly toxic to the granule cells in the cerebellum while the Purkinje cells are relatively refractory. Though this specificity for granule cell pathology is unclear, differential expression of GABAA receptor subunits (α6 GABAA receptor subunits on granule cells and α1 on the Purkinje cells) and NMDA subunits have been postulated (higher NMDAR2 expression in granule cells and NMDAR1 in Purkinje cells) as the likely causes. Reference Yuan and Atchison5,Reference Kaur, Aschner and Syversen6

Hg-induced oxidative stress, disruption of neurotransmitter metabolism, excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, selenium depletion, interaction with microtubules, altered membrane transport, and genetic susceptibility are hypothesized as possible etiological factors for neurodegeneration due to Hg exposure. Reference Bjørklund, Dadar, Mutter and Aaseth7Reference Andrew, Chen and Caller10 In mouse models, MeHg has been shown to decrease the number of neurites and alter the cytoskeletal structure in dopaminergic neurons. Reference Götz, Koutsilieri, Riederer, Ceccatelli and Daré11 Using a dopaminergic cell line, Shao et al. have demonstrated that MeHg can affect dopaminergic signaling in a way similar to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+). Reference Shao, Figeys, Ning, Mailloux and Chan12 MPP+ and MeHg both can alter the expression of genes involved in dopaminergic signal transduction pathway like dopa decarboxylase (DDC), PARK2, PARK7, SLC6A3, synuclein alpha (SNCA), and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH).

Hg can also trigger the production of proinflammatory factors like interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin 1 β (IL-1 β), and autoantibodies. Reference Pollard, Cauvi, Toomey, Hultman and Kono13 Loss of tolerance to self-antigens, change in autoantigen fibrillarin, activation of type 2 T helper cell (Th2) response, production of proinflammatory cytokines, stimulation of Cathepsin B activity, and induction of VEGF and IL-6 have all been attributed to the possible link between Hg and autoimmunity. Reference Bjørklund, Peana, Dadar, Chirumbolo, Aaseth and Martins14 Genetic polymorphisms in Glutathione S-transferase family (GSTs), metallothioneins (MTs), selenoproteins, ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily (ABCs), organic anion transporters (OATs), L-amino acid transporters (LATs), and APOE ⊠4 allele are likely responsible for differential body handling of Hg in susceptible individuals after environmental exposure. Reference Andreoli and Sprovieri15 Pathophysiology of Hg-induced movement disorders has been summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Pathophysiology of mercury-induced movement disorders

Human Exposure to Mercury

The use of Hg can be found in the history of medicine and alchemy of the ancient Egyptian, Greek, Roman, Chinese, and Hindu civilizations. Reference Norn, Permin, Kruse and Kruse16 Hg was used by the ancient Egyptians and archeologists have found Hg in an Egyptian tomb dating to 1500 BC. The alchemists wondered about the mystical properties of Hg and used it to transmute base metals into gold. For alchemy, the Hindus used the word “Rasasiddhi” that means “knowledge of mercury”, with a belief that Hg was at the core of all metals and correct combination of Hg and other ingredients can yield gold. Gradually, the distinction between alchemy and medicine became blurred and cinnabar (mercuric sulfide) started being misused as an elixir of life to confer longevity or immortality. Reports of the therapeutic use of Hg and its compounds in syphilis are available from the 15th century till as late as the mid 20th century. Reference Graeme and Pollack17 With the advent of industrialization in 19th century, the toxic effects of Hg started affecting humanity in different parts of the world [Table 2]. An age-old source of Hg intoxication is the amalgamation technique, mainly used for gold extraction and the tradition is still being followed in many countries. The ore on being mixed with water, salt, and liquid Hg bind to the metal as an Hg–gold amalgam complex that releases Hg vapors if heated, leaving behind the gold particles. These vapors are an important source of inhalational Hg toxicity from ancient times and the metallic form is released into the rivers and carried downstream, becoming another major source of toxicity. Reference Brooks, Öztürk and Cansu18,Reference Brooks, Schwörbel and Castillo19 Aquatic ecosystem and marine food chain are getting affected by the toxic waste of Hg even today. The Global Mercury Assessment 2018 (GMA 2018) conducted by the United Nations has shown that artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) (37.7%), stationary combustion of fossil fuel and biomass, especially coal (21%), nonferrous metals production (15%), and cement production (11%) are currently the four main sources of Hg emission. Major sources of Hg exposure in the modern world are shown in Table 3.

Table 2: Historical vignettes of mercury exposure

Table 3: Present global scenario of mercury exposure

Human exposure to Hg can have toxic effects on cardiovascular (cardiomyopathy), hematological (hemolytic and aplastic anemia), renal (acute tubular necrosis, nephrotic syndrome, glomerulonephritis, chronic kidney disease), pulmonary (bronchitis, pulmonary fibrosis), immunological (affecting polymorphonuclear leukocytes, flaring up autoimmunity), endocrinal (hypoadrenalism, hypopituitarism, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism), reproductive (reduced fertility, menstrual disorders), embryonic (neural tube defects, craniofacial malformations, growth retardation), and neurological (movement disorders, psychiatric issues, autism, peripheral sensory neuropathy, optic neuropathy, hearing impairment) systems. Reference Rice, Walker, Wu, Gillette and Blough20 In this review, we have highlighted the neurotoxicity of Hg from a movement disorder perspective.

Movement Disorders Associated with Mercury Exposure

  1. 1. Named syndromic disorders:

    1. (a) Hunter Russell syndrome and Minamata disease: In the early 1950s, an epidemiological study in Minamata, Japan first noticed that several cats fed on a fish diet were developing movement disorders, convulsions, and death (“dancing cat disease”). Reference Kitamura, Miyata and Tomita21 In 1977, a similar incident was noted in Northwestern Ontario, Canada where cats were noted to develop ataxic gait, movement disorders, seizures, and uncontrolled howling. Reference Takeuchi, D’Itri, Fischer, Annett and Okabe22 Cerebellar ataxia, dysarthria, and visual field constriction constitute the classic triad of Hunter-Russell syndrome of organic Hg intoxication. Reference Hunter and Russell23 Postural and action tremor were prominent. Electrophysiological analysis of the postural tremor in Minamata disease and have noted the mean frequency of 7.1 Hz and mean amplitude of 1.8 mV. Reference Yamanaga24 Brain autopsy of patients with “Minamata disease” showed degeneration and damage to the calcarine region of the occipital lobe, central and temporal cortices, atrophy of the granular cell layer of cerebellum, and dorsal roots. Reference Eto, Marumoto and Takeya25

    2. (b) Danbury shakes: In the 19th and early 20th centuries, workers of hat factories at Danbury, Connecticut, USA, exposed to Hg vapor during the process of “carroting” and felting, were noticed to have fine tremor in hands interrupted by coarse myoclonic jerks (“Danbury shakes”) Reference Tepper26 along with the behavioral issues ranging from pathological shyness to profound irritability, insomnia, hyperactivity and psychotic behaviors (“mad hatters”). Jerky postural tremor is one of the commonest presentations of elemental Hg poisoning and has been described in the literature as “mercurial tremors”, “metallic tremor” or “tremblant metallique”, the term used to describe the tremor noted in water gilders in Paris.

  2. 2. Other movement disorders

    1. (a) Cerebellar ataxia and tremor: Gait and limb ataxia, dysmetria, and dysdiadochokinesia along with dysarthria and visual field constriction were reported in lamp socket manufacturers chronically exposed to elementalHg. Reference Yang, Huang, Shih and Yang27 Rhee et al. have reported subacute onset slowly progressive cerebellar ataxia from exposure to Hg vapor. Reference Rhee, Lee, Yoon, Lee, Chang and Chang28 Subacute cerebellar ataxia has also been reported from the Indian subcontinent from ayurvedic medicine containing a high amount ofHg. Reference Renjen and Chaudhari29 Malkani et al. have reported the development of limb and gait ataxia, dysdiadochokinesia, nystagmus, dysarthria along with multiple cranial nerve palsies from subcutaneous injection of elemental Hg (“quick silver pellets”) with the cultural belief of protection against sickness. Reference Malkani, Weinstein, Kumar, Victor and Bernstein30

    2. A study in Brazilian gold traders exposed to Hg vapor have measured tremor frequency mainly in high-frequency windows (6.6–10.0 Hz). Reference Biernat, Ellias and Wermuth31 Motor deficits in the form of tremor, incoordination and poor fine motor control, and subtle cognitive changes have been noted among dentists exposed toHg. Reference Echeverria, Heyer, Martin, Naleway, Woods and Bittner32 A study by Rustam et al. on MeHg poisoning in Iraq, noted that around 13% of patients had intention tremor, while flapping and static tremor were less frequent. Reference Rustam and Hamdi33 Sequential neurological manifestations have been reported in Hg vapor (elemental mercury) poisoning. While initial symptoms can be upper limb weakness, intention tremor, loss of fine motor coordination, and numbness, continued exposure leads to coarser tremor and spasm interfering with feeding or writing. Tremor and spasm can later involve the lower extremity, trunk, and head. Reference Doherty34 Schaumburg et al. have reported the development of mild fine rapid rest tremor of the fingers, markedly exaggerated on movement, in a patient with a history of self-administration of elemental mercury subcutaneously. Reference Schaumburg, Gellido, Smith, Nelson and Hoffman35 Bradberry et al. have reported a case of a 36-year-old jewelry producer exposed to Hg vapor presenting with a coarse tremor of the hands and protruded tongue, slurred speech, cerebellar ataxia, and constricted visual fields. Reference Bradberry, Sheehan, Barraclough and Vale36

    3. (b) Myoclonus: Roullet et al. have reported severe intention and action myoclonus in a 58-year-old laboratory glassware manufacturer with occupational exposure to Hg vapor. Reference Roullet, Nizou, Jedynak and Lhermitte37 Ragothaman et al. have described a case of a 23-year Chemistry graduate, who developed progressive generalized myoclonus and ataxia as a result of self-injecting elemental mercury. Reference Ragothaman, Kulkarni and Ashraf38 Myoclonus was present at rest and worsened with activity. Electrophysiological studies revealed large-amplitude (12.1 µV) somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) and high frequency (10–30 Hz), short duration (less than 50 ms) EMG bursts, suggesting the cortical origin of the myoclonus. The symptoms improved after surgical clearance of the subcutaneous Hg deposits from the injection site.

    4. (c) Chorea: Ko et al. have reported the development of generalized chorea from Hg poisoning in a 50-year-old female, in whom symptoms improved with chelation therapy. Reference Ko, Lee and Kandg39 Chorea, athetosis, and hemiballismus were reported in patients exposed to MeHg in Japan and Iraq. Reference Rustam and Hamdi33,Reference Ekino, Susa, Ninomiya, Imamura and Kitamura40Reference Snyder42

    5. (d) Parkinsonism: Hsu et al. noted that in patients exposed to dental amalgam fillings, the incidence of PD was 1.5 times higher than those nonexposed. Reference Hsu, Chang and Lee43 Some studies have also noted a higher incidence of PD in dentists when regularly exposed to Hg vapor. Reference Schulte, Burnett, Boeniger and Johnson44,Reference Bjorklund, Stejskal, Urbina, Dadar, Chirumbolo and Mutter45 Finkelstein et al. reported the development of hemiparkinsonism in a 47-year-old female dentist who improved with chelation therapy by D-Penicillamine. Reference Finkelstein, Vardi, Kesten and Hod46 Fabrizio et al. have noted a high prevalence of extrapyramidal signs and symptoms (PD, postural tremor) in a group of male dental technicians working in a technical high school in Rome. Reference Fabrizio, Vanacore, Valente, Rubino and Meco47 Miller et al. have reported a case of a 55-year-old worker of chlorine factory, who developed parkinsonism after chronic exposure to metallic Hg vapor. Reference Miller, Ochudło, Opala, Smolicha and Siuda48 Palacios et al. have investigated a possible correlation between airborne metal exposure of female nurses and risk of PD by a large prospective study with a study duration of 18 years (1990–2008) and involving 121,701 participants from 11 different US states. Reference Palacios, Fitzgerald and Roberts49 In the study, Hg was the only metal found to be associated with the highest risk of PD(CI = 0.99–1.79). A study by Dantzig Reference Dantzig50 has also shown the possible relation between PD and chronic low levels of Hg poisoning in susceptible individuals. Reference Dantzig50 The study noted that detectable blood Hg levels were six times more frequent in individuals with PD than in healthy controls and proposed that a dermatological manifestation of chronic Hg exposure, Grover’s disease (transient acantholytic dermatitis), may be a clinical clue to predict who are at risk of developing PD. Lin et al. showed a significant decrease in striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) in workers exposed to Hg vapor. Reference Lin, Liou, Hsiech, Ku and Tsai51 However, unless a definite correlation between chronic Hg exposure and development of PD is shown in large-scale human studies, the possible link between Hg and PD remains a matter of debate.

  3. 3. Mercury and autoimmune movement disorders

Recently, Pérez et al. have summarized 41 cases of Hg-induced Morvan syndrome, the autoimmune disorder related to antibodies against contactin-associated protein-like 2 (Caspr2). Reference Pérez, Shah and Butler52 Features of peripheral nerve hyperexcitability like neuromyotonia, electromyographic evidence of myokymia along with encephalopathy, insomnia, and autonomic dysfunction are the hallmarks of Morvan syndrome. Additional painful paresthesia, severe myalgia, arthralgia, and generalized rash were noted by Pérez et al. in “Morvan syndrome-plus” related to an accidental indoor spill of metallic Hg. In addition to the characteristic anti-Caspr2 antibody, other antibodies like anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1), anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65-kilodalton isoform (GAD65), and anti-voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) antibodies were detected by Pérez et al., suggesting larger spectrum of autoimmune response to Hg. In the literature, varied source of exposure to Hg and resulting Morvan syndrome-like phenotype with serum anti-Caspr2 positivity has been described. Like accidental spillage of a bottle of Hg beads, therapeutic use of mercuric iodide, use of skin whitener, and taking indigenous or ayurvedic medicine. Reference Lu and Khera53Reference Perumal, Velayudham, Jeyaraj and Arunan57 Similarly, Malkani et al. noted anti-Purkinje cell cytoplasmic-type Tr antibody positivity in a case of elemental mercury toxicity presenting with cerebellar ataxia. Reference Malkani, Weinstein, Kumar, Victor and Bernstein30 In a developing country like India, ayurvedic drugs containing Hg are still being used abundantly and the physician should never forget to take detailed drug history when a patient presents with such phenotype.

  1. 4. Other neurological features associated with mercury-induced movement disorders

Some neurological features apart from movement disorders are often associated with elementary and organic Hg exposure and can be vital clues for the clinicians to suspect this toxic etiology. Neuropsychiatric symptoms of chronic elementary Hg exposure can range from irritability, insomnia, excessive dreaming to the full-blown picture of “erythrism” in the late stage with personality changes, excessive shyness mixed with nervousness and irritability, anxiety, depression, delirium, hallucination, and seizures. Reference Stier and Gordon58,Reference Lucchini and Hashim59 Dyspnoea, hypersalivation, skin ulceration, and tooth loss are other clues that can indicate elemental Hg poisoning.

On the other hand, moderate to severe constriction of the bilateral visual fields is one of the characteristic features of MeHg poisoning along with sensory impairment in distal extremities in the form of paresthesia and numbness. Reference Bakir, Damluji and Amin-Zaki60 Perioral sensory disturbance with an “onion peel” somatosensory distribution can be seen. Reference Jackson61,Reference Tokuomi, Uchino, Imamura, Yamanaga, Nakanishi and Ideta62 Hearing difficulty, dizziness, and unsteadiness are commonly associated. Reference Yorifuji, Tsuda, Takao and Harada63,Reference Tsubaki and Irukayama64

Management of Suspected Mercury Exposure/Toxicity

Laboratory Investigations

Detailed history including occupational exposure and thorough clinical examination still hold the key in diagnosing Hg-related movement disorders. Any exposure to indigenous or ayurvedic medicine and any practice of magico-ritualistic use of Hg should not be overlooked either. Laboratory investigations to detect the presence of Hg intoxication include blood and urine Hg levels, assays on scalp hair and toenail samples. Reference Ye, Kim and Jeon65 A literature review by Fields et al., comprising over 3000 workers chronically exposed to elemental Hg, has mentioned that physical examination (tremor, incoordination, brisk reflexes) is more important for assessing workers with urinary Hg level > 200 µg/L, while for those with low urine Hg levels, neurobehavioral testing is more useful. Reference Fields, Borak and Louis66 However, the slow excretion of Hg from the body and non-accuracy to predict the timing of neuronal injury make these assays not very helpful in Hg-induced neurotoxicity. Lack of adequate dose–response studies makes it difficult to set a threshold level for Hg in blood or urine for immunologically sensitive individuals.

Chelation Therapy

D-Penicillamine has been used as an oral chelating agent in inorganic Hg toxicity (adult dose: 250 mg qid, pediatric dose: 20–30 mg/kg/day for 1–2 weeks), but has no role in MeHg exposure. Reference Gledhill and Hopkins67,Reference Caravati, Erdman and Christianson68 Hypersensitivity and nephrotoxicity are the commonest side effects of penicillamine. Similarly, dimercaprol or British anti-Lewisite (BAL) has also been used successfully mainly in inorganic and elemental mercury poisoning (deep intramuscular injection of 5 mg/kg for every 4 h for 1–2 days, then 2.5 mg/kg one–two times/day for 10 days). Reference Renjen and Chaudhari29,Reference Kamensky, Horton, Kingsley and Bridges69 Nausea, vomiting, hypertension, tachycardia, headache, diaphoresis, and convulsions are the common side effects of dimercaprol.

The water-soluble analogues of BAL, 2,3-dimercaptopropane sulfonic acid (DMPS), and Meso 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) are better alternatives for detoxification in elemental or organic Hg exposure. Reference Kosnett70 They can be administered orally or as an IV injection. In the Mt. Diwata study (Philippines), gold miners exposed to elemental mercury were compared to people living downstream who were exposed to MeHg from eating fish and to controls without known exposure toHg. Reference Böse-O’Reilly, Drasch and Beinhoff71 One-hundred and six probands completed the 2-week trial of oral DMPS 400 mg daily. The study noted a marked improvement in hypomimia, pencil tapping, Romberg test, tremor, and ataxia. Importantly, the therapeutic efficacy was almost similar between the participants exposed to the elemental mercury group (miners) and in the MeHg group (downstream fish eaters). In another study, among patients with occupational exposure to Hg vapor, 2 weeks of oral DMPS 100 mg thrice daily followed by DMPS 100 mg four times a day for an additional 6 weeks have shown beneficial effects. Reference Campbell, Clarkson and Omar72 Dose of DMSA is 10 mg/kg (350 mg/m2 in children) tid for the initial 5 days, followed by 10 mg/kg (350 mg/m2 in children) bid for the next 14 days. Reference Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Kazemi and Moghadamnia1 Newer DMSA analogues like Mono isoamyl ester of DMSA (MiADMSA), Monomethyl DMSA (MmDMSA), and Monocyclohexyl DMSA (MchDMSA), either alone or in combination with DMSA, are also being studied for better chelation therapy. Reference Bhadauria and Flora73

Preventive Measures for Mercury Contamination

Though the overall Hg emissions into the environment have decreased over the past decades, improper disposal of industrial waste, artisanal gold mining, and indiscriminate use and more importantly disposal of Hg-containing products like dental amalgam, CFLs, batteries, etc., are still polluting our ecosystem and affecting us via different routes. Minamata Convention on Mercury, a global treaty, has been formed to address these issues. Different preventive measures can be taken to minimize the Hg contamination like: (i) maintaining proper protocol for transport and handling of Hg products; (ii) installation of ISO-11143-certified amalgam separators; (iii) using Hg-free dental materials; (iv) using carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to remove Hg from water; (v) operationalizing proper collection and recycling programs for Hg-containing lamps; (vi) stopping the use of Hg cells in chloralkali plants and upgrading them to newer “membrane technology”; (vii) substitution by non-Hg alternatives in residential or industrial sectors; (viii) restricting the use of Hg in gold mining and using other techniques like “concentration methods”, “direct smelting”, or “cyanide leaching” to extract gold; (ix) controlling Hg emissions through “end-of-pipe techniques” like exhaust gas filtering and using controlled landfill for waste disposal; (x) proper vigilance on the misuse of Hg in indigenous medicine available in the market or online; and (xi) prohibition of the misuse of Hg in magico-ritualistic practices. Reference Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Rafati-Rahimzadeh, Kazemi and Moghadamnia1,74Reference Valderrama77 The measures need to be strictly implemented and monitored. More active involvement of the groups such as the United Nations Environment Programme or the Artisanal Gold Council is needed to teach the miners to incorporate relatively inexpensive technologies into their work so that they can sustain their livelihood and perhaps enjoy a better life with less exposure toHg. Reference Konkel78 Finally, trading in hazardous wastes like ship breaking industry, though provides raw materials as an incentive to the weaker economy of developing countries, also adds to toxic wastes that have serious implications on environmental and human health. Though the 1989 Basel convention seeks to halt such transport of hazardous wastes, illegal trade and exports between less regulated countries persist. Reference Sonak, Sonak and Giriyan79 There should be means to recycle or reuse this waste to prevent toxic exposure to the native population and workers.

Conclusion

Toxic effects of Hg have affected humanity through the pages of history. Modernization of society has changed modes of human exposure, but Hg is still a potential etiology in patients presenting with cerebellar ataxia, postural and action tremor, myoclonus or myoclonus ataxia, parkinsonism, and autoimmune movement disorders. With a wide range of neurological symptoms, clinicians should be well aware of the toxic profile of Hg and detailed occupational, environmental, and drug history should always be taken.

Chelation with DMPS or its analogues has shown efficacy as therapeutic agents for Hg toxicity but more clinical trials are needed. Unfortunately, irreversible neuronal damage often already sets in by the time neurological signs manifest, thus chelation therapy may be ineffective. Thus, it is of utmost importance to eliminate the potential dietary or occupational source to prevent neurodegeneration. Finally, implementation and monitoring of strict regulatory guidelines and strategies to combat environmental Hg toxicity are indispensable to prevent its neurotoxicity and protect our beautiful world.

Take Home Message

  1. 1. Human exposure to Hg is still prevalent in the modern world.

  2. 2. Cerebellar ataxia, tremor, and myoclonus are common movement disorders from exposure to Hg.

  3. 3. Parkinsonism and autoimmune Morvan syndrome can be associated withHg.

  4. 4. Detailed occupational, environmental, and drug history are the keys to diagnose Hg-induced movement disorders.

  5. 5. Preventive strategies must be implemented globally to get rid of the toxic effects of Hg.

Conflict of Interest

No authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Statement of Authorship

1. Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution.

2. Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.

JG: 1B, 1C, 2A.

DK: 1B, 1C.

MJ: 1A, 2B.

References

Rafati-Rahimzadeh, M, Rafati-Rahimzadeh, M, Kazemi, S, Moghadamnia, AA. Current approaches of the management of mercury poisoning: need of the hour. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2014;22:46. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-22-46 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Finley, EJ, Aschner, M. Recent advances in mercury research. Curr Environ Heal Rep. 2014. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0014-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, TW, Vyas, JB, Ballatori, N. Mechanisms of mercury disposition in the body. Am J Ind Med. 2007. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20476 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farina, M, Rocha, JBT, Aschner, M. Mechanisms of methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity: evidence from experimental studies. Life Sci. 2011;89:555–63. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.05.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, Y, Atchison, WD. Methylmercury differentially affects GABA a receptor-mediated spontaneous IPSCs in Purkinje and Granule cells of rat cerebellar slices. J Physiol. 2003;550:191204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, P, Aschner, M, Syversen, T. Methylmercury neurotoxicity: why are some cells more vulnerable than others? In: Methylmercury and Neurotoxicity. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2012, pp. 241–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2383-6_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørklund, G, Dadar, M, Mutter, J, Aaseth, J. The toxicology of mercury: current research and emerging trends. Environ Res. 2017;159:545–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.051 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjørklund, G, Tinkov, AA, Dadar, M, et al. Insights into the potential role of mercury in Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12031-019-01274-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, FO, Atchison, WD. The role of environmental mercury, lead and pesticide exposure in development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:761–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2009.07.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrew, AS, Chen, CY, Caller, TA, et al. Toenail mercury Levels are associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58:3641. doi: 10.1002/mus.26055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, ME, Koutsilieri, E, Riederer, P, Ceccatelli, S, Daré, E. Methylmercury induces neurite degeneration in primary culture of mouse dopaminergic mesencephalic cells. J Neural Transm. 2002;109:597605. doi: 10.1007/s007020200049 Google ScholarPubMed
Shao, Y, Figeys, D, Ning, Z, Mailloux, R, Chan, HM. Methylmercury can induce Parkinson’s-like neurotoxicity similar to 1-methyl-4- phenylpyridinium: A genomic and proteomic analysis on MN9D dopaminergic neuron cells. J Toxicol Sci. 2015;40:817–28. doi: 10.2131/jts.40.817 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, KM, Cauvi, DM, Toomey, CB, Hultman, P, Kono, DH. Mercury-induced inflammation and autoimmunity. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj. 2019;1863:129299. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.02.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjørklund, G, Peana, M, Dadar, M, Chirumbolo, S, Aaseth, J, Martins, N. Mercury-induced autoimmunity: Drifting from micro to macro concerns on autoimmune disorders. Clin Immunol. 2020;213:108352. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108352 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreoli, V, Sprovieri, F. Genetic aspects of susceptibility to mercury toxicity: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:93. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010093 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norn, S, Permin, H, Kruse, E, Kruse, PR. Mercury--a major agent in the history of medicine and alchemy. Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2008;36:2140. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19831290.Google Scholar
Graeme, KA, Pollack, CV. Heavy metal toxicity, Part I: arsenic and mercury. J Emerg Med. 1998;16:4556. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(97)00241-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, WE, Öztürk, H, Cansu, Z. Amalgamation and small-scale gold mining at Ancient Sardis, Turkey. Archaeol Discov. 2017;5:4259. doi: 10.4236/ad.2017.51003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, WE, Schwörbel, G, Castillo, LE. Amalgamation and Small-Scale Gold Mining in the Ancient Andes. In: Mining and Quarrying in the Ancient Andes. New York, NY: Springer; 2013, pp. 213–29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5200-3_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, KM, Walker, EM, Wu, M, Gillette, C, Blough, ER. Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J Prev Med Public Heal. 2014;47:7483. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.2.74 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitamura, S, Miyata, C, Tomita, M, et al. Epidemiological investigation of the unknown central nervous disorder in the Minamata district. Kumamoto Med J. 1957;31:19.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, T, D’Itri, FM, Fischer, P V., Annett, CS, Okabe, M. The outbreak of Minamata disease (methyl mercury poisoning) in cats on Northwestern Ontario Reserves. Environ Res. 1977;13:215–28. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(77)90098-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, D, Russell, DS. Focal cerebral and cerebellar atrophy in a human subject due to organic mercury compounds. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1954;17:235–41. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.17.4.235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaga, H. Quantitative analysis of tremor in Minamata disease. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1983;141:1322. doi: 10.1620/tjem.141.13 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eto, K, Marumoto, M, Takeya, M. The pathology of methylmercury poisoning (Minamata disease). Neuropathology. 2010;30:471–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2010.01119.x Google Scholar
Tepper, LB. Industrial Mercurialism: Agricola to the Danbury Shakes. IA J Soc Ind Archeol. 2010;36:4763. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41759331.Google Scholar
Yang, Y-J, Huang, C-C, Shih, T-S, Yang, S-S. Chronic elemental mercury intoxication: clinical and field studies in lampsocket manufacturers. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:267–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27730094.10.1136/oem.51.4.267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhee, H-Y, Lee, M-S, Yoon, S-S, Lee, TG, Chang, D-I, Chang, K-C. A case of mercury intoxication presenting cerebellar ataxia. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2002;20:425–27.Google Scholar
Renjen, P, Chaudhari, D. Unusual case of subacute cerebellar ataxia. Neurol India. 2018;66:1482. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.241403 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malkani, R, Weinstein, JM, Kumar, N, Victor, TA, Bernstein, L. Ataxia and cranial neuropathies from subcutaneously injected elemental mercury. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49:334–36. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.566881 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biernat, H, Ellias, SA, Wermuth, L, et al. Tremor frequency patterns in mercury vapor exposure, compared with early Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Neurotoxicology. 1999;20:945–52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10693975.Google ScholarPubMed
Echeverria, D, Heyer, NJ, Martin, MD, Naleway, CA, Woods, JS, Bittner, AC. Behavioral effects of low-level exposure to Hg among dentists. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1995;17:161–68. doi: 10.1016/0892-0362(94)00049-J CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rustam, H, Hamdi, T. Methyl mercury poisoning in Iraq. A neurological study. Brain. 1974;97:500–10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4425451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, MJ. The quicksilver prize: mercury vapor poisoning aboard HMS Triumph and HMS Phipps. Neurology. 2004;62:963–66. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000118789.33171.47 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaumburg, HH, Gellido, C, Smith, SW, Nelson, LS, Hoffman, RS. Elemental mercury neurotoxicity from self-injection. Neurology. 2009;72:377–78. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000341310.05441.28 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradberry, SM, Sheehan, TMT, Barraclough, CR, Vale, JA. DMPS can reverse the features of severe mercury vapor-induced neurological damage. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009;47:894–98. doi: 10.3109/15563650903333812 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roullet, E, Nizou, R, Jedynak, P, Lhermitte, F. Intention and action myoclonus disclosing occupational mercury poisoning. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1984;140:5558.Google ScholarPubMed
Ragothaman, M, Kulkarni, G, Ashraf, V V., et al. Elemental mercury poisoning probably causes cortical myoclonus. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1964–68. doi: 10.1002/mds.21641 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, K-K, Lee, H-W, Kandg, K. Chorea associated with mercury poisoning. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2013;31:196–98.Google Scholar
Ekino, S, Susa, M, Ninomiya, T, Imamura, K, Kitamura, T. Minamata disease revisited: an update on the acute and chronic manifestations of methyl mercury poisoning. J Neurol Sci. 2007;262:131–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harada, M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995;25:124. doi: 10.3109/10408449509089885 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, RD. The involuntary movements of chronic mercury poisoning. Arch Neurol. 1972;26:379–81. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1972.00490100109013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, Y-C, Chang, C-W, Lee, H-L, et al. Association between history of dental amalgam fillings and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. Wu P-H, ed. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, PA, Burnett, CA, Boeniger, MF, Johnson, J. Neurodegenerative diseases: occupational occurrence and potential risk factors, 1982 through 1991. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1281–88. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.9.1281 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjorklund, G, Stejskal, V, Urbina, MA, Dadar, M, Chirumbolo, S, Mutter, J. Metals and Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms and biochemical processes. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:2198–214. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666171129124616 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelstein, Y, Vardi, J, Kesten, MM, Hod, I. The enigma of parkinsonism in chronic borderline mercury intoxication, resolved by challenge with penicillamine. Neurotoxicology. 1996;17:291–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Fabrizio, E, Vanacore, N, Valente, M, Rubino, A, Meco, G. High prevalence of extrapyramidal signs and symptoms in a group of Italian dental technicians. BMC Neurol. 2007;7:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-7-24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K, Ochudło, S, Opala, G, Smolicha, W, Siuda, J. Parkinsonism in chronic occupational metallic mercury intoxication. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2003;37 (Suppl 5):3138.Google ScholarPubMed
Palacios, N, Fitzgerald, K, Roberts, AL, et al. A prospective analysis of airborne metal exposures and risk of Parkinson disease in the nurses’ health study cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:933–38. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307218 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzig, PI. Parkinson’s disease, macular degeneration and cutaneous signs of mercury Toxicity. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:656. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000228351.74230.52 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, C-Y, Liou, S-H, Hsiech, C-M, Ku, M-C, Tsai, S-Y. Dose-response relationship between cumulative mercury exposure index and specific uptake ratio in the striatum on Tc-99m Trodat Spect. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:689–93. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181e9fa93 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez, CA, Shah, EG, Butler, IJ. Mercury-induced autoimmunity: report of two adolescent siblings with Morvan syndrome “plus” and review of the literature. J Neuroimmunol. 2020;342:577197. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2020.577197 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, M, Khera, S. Autoimmune manifestations of acute mercury Toxicity. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020;59:816–18. doi: 10.1177/0009922820915885 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil, R, Lefèvre, JP, Neau, JP, Guillard, O, Hulin, A. Morvan’s fibrillary chorea and acrodynic syndrome following mercury treatment. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1984;140:728–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, Y, Ren, H, Ren, M, et al. Morvan syndrome plus thyroid dysfunction: a case with chronic mercury exposure. Neurol India. 2014;62:218. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.132439 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Z, Zhang, X, Cui, F, et al. Subacute motor neuron hyperexcitability with mercury poisoning: a case series and literature review. Eur Neurol. 2014;72:218–22. doi: 10.1159/000363290 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perumal, SR, Velayudham, S, Jeyaraj, KM, Arunan, S. A case of Morvan’s syndrome associated with heavy metal poisoning after Ayurvedic drug intake. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9:431–33. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_555_17 Google Scholar
Stier, PA, Gordon, RA. Psychiatric aspects of mercury poisoning. Med Updat Psychiatr. 1998;3:144–47. doi: 10.1016/S1082-7579(98)00022-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucchini, RG, Hashim, D. Tremor secondary to neurotoxic exposure. Mercury, lead, solvents, pesticides. Handbook Clin Neurol. 2015; 131:241–49. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62627-1.00014-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakir, F, Damluji, SF, Amin-Zaki, L, et al. Methylmercury Poisoning in Iraq. Science (80-). 1973;181:230–41. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4096.230 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, AC. Chronic neurological disease due to methylmercury poisoning. Can J Neurol Sci/J Can des Sci Neurol. 2018;45:620–23. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2018.323 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokuomi, H, Uchino, M, Imamura, S, Yamanaga, H, Nakanishi, R, Ideta, T. Minamata disease (organic mercury poisoning): neuroradiologic and electrophysiologic studies. Neurology. 1982;32:1369–69. doi: 10.1212/WNL.32.12.1369 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yorifuji, T, Tsuda, T, Takao, S, Harada, M. Long-term exposure to methylmercury and neurologic signs in Minamata and neighboring communities. Epidemiology. 2008;19:39. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31815c09d2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsubaki, T, Irukayama, K, ed. Minamata Disease: Methylmercury Poisoning in Minamata and Niigata, Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha; Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: Elsevier; 1977, pp. 186208.Google Scholar
Ye, B-J, Kim, B-G, Jeon, M-J, et al. Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury intoxication. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:5. doi: 10.1186/s40557-015-0086-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fields, CA, Borak, J, Louis, ED. Mercury-induced motor and sensory neurotoxicity: systematic review of workers currently exposed to mercury vapor. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2017;47:815–48. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2017.1342598 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gledhill, RF, Hopkins, AP. Chronic inorganic mercury poisoning treated with N-Acetyl-D-Penicillamine. Br J Ind Med. 1972;29:225–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27722707.Google ScholarPubMed
Caravati, EM, Erdman, AR, Christianson, G, et al. Elemental mercury exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol. 2008;46:121. doi: 10.1080/15563650701664731 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamensky, OL, Horton, D, Kingsley, DP, Bridges, CC. A case of accidental mercury intoxication. J Emerg Med. 2019;56:275–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.039 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosnett, MJ. The role of chelation in the treatment of arsenic and mercury poisoning. J Med Toxicol. 2013;9:347–54. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0344-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böse-O’Reilly, S, Drasch, G, Beinhoff, C, et al. The Mt. Diwata study on the Philippines 2000-treatment of mercury intoxicated inhabitants of a gold mining area with DMPS (2,3-dimercapto-1-propane-sulfonic acid, Dimaval). Sci Total Environ. 2003;307:7182. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00547-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, JR, Clarkson, TW, Omar, MD. The therapeutic use of 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate in two cases of inorganic mercury poisoning. JAMA. 1986;256:3127–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3783847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhadauria, S, Flora, SJS. Response of arsenic-induced oxidative stress, DNA damage, and metal imbalance to combined administration of DMSA and monoisoamyl-DMSA during chronic arsenic poisoning in rats. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2007;23:91104. doi: 10.1007/s10565-006-0135-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercury and the environment. Canada.ca. 2017.Google Scholar
Tawabini, B, Al-Khaldi, S, Atieh, M, Khaled, M. Removal of mercury from water by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61:591–98. doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.897 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tibau, AV, Grube, BD. Mercury contamination from dental amalgam. J Heal Pollut. 2019;9:190612. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-9.22.190612 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valderrama, C. Membranes in the Chlor-Alkali industry. In: Encyclopedia of Membranes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015, pp. 15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_2124-1 Google Scholar
Konkel, L. A Safer Gold Rush? Curbing Mercury Pollution in Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127:112001. doi: 10.1289/EHP6417 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonak, S, Sonak, M, Giriyan, A. Shipping hazardous waste: implications for economically developing countries. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ. 2008;8:143–59. doi: 10.1007/s10784-008-9069-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: Uptake and transport of mercury in the body.

Figure 1

Figure 2: Human exposure to elemental and organic mercury.

Figure 2

Table 1: Pathophysiology of mercury-induced movement disorders

Figure 3

Table 2: Historical vignettes of mercury exposure

Figure 4

Table 3: Present global scenario of mercury exposure