Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:23:24.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A National Survey and Literature Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Aleksa Cenic
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Mohit Bhandari
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopedics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Kesava Reddy*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
*
66 Charlton Avenue West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 2C1, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To survey neurosurgical practices in the treatment of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma in the Canadian adult population.

Methods:

We developed and administered a questionnaire to Canadian Neurosurgeons with questions relating to the management of chronic and subacute subdural hematoma. Our sampling frame included all neurosurgery members of the Canadian Neurosurgical Society.

Results:

Of 158 questionnaires, 120 were returned (response rate = 76%). The respondents were neurosurgeons with primarily adult clinical practices (108/120). Surgeons preferred one and two burr-hole craniostomy to craniotomy or twist-drill craniostomy as the procedure of choice for initial treatment of subdural hematoma (35.5% vs 49.5% vs 4.7% vs 9.3%, respectively). Craniotomy and two burr-holes were preferred for recurrent subdural hematomas (43.3% and 35.1%, respectively). Surgeons preferred irrigation of the subdural cavity (79.6%), use of a subdural drain (80.6%), and no use of anti-convulsants or corticosteroids (82.1% and 86.6%, respectively). We identified a lack of consensus with keeping patients supine following surgery and post-operative antibiotic use.

Conclusion:

Our survey has identified variations in practice patterns among Canadian Neurosurgeons with respect to treatment of subacute or chronic subdural hematoma (SDH). Our findings support the need for further prospective studies and clinical trials to resolve areas of discrepancies in clinical management and hence, standardize treatment regimens.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ: Objectif:

Effectuer une enquête sur le traitement neurochirurgical de l’hématome sous-dural chronique et subaigu dans la population adulte canadienne.

Méthodes:

Nous avons développé un questionnaire comportant des questions sur la prise en charge de l’hématome sous-dural chronique et subaigu et nous l’avons soumis aux neurochirurgiens canadiens. Notre échantillon était constitué de tous les membres de la Société canadienne de neurochirurgie.

Résultats:

120 des 158 questionnaires postés ont été retournés (taux de réponse de 76%). Les répondants étaient des neurochirurgiens en pratique clinique adulte surtout (108/120). Les chirurgiens préféraient la craniostomie à un et à deux trous de trépan plutôt que la craniotomie ou la craniostomie par foret hélicoïdal pour le traitement initial de l’hématome sous-dural (35,5% ; 49,5% ; 4,7% ; 9,3% respectivement). La craniotomie et la craniostomie à deux trous de fraise étaient les techniques privilégiées pour traiter les récidives d’hématomes sous-duraux (43,3% et 35,1% respectivement). Les chirurgiens préféraient l’irrigation de la cavité sous-durale (79,6%), la mise en place d’un drain sous-dural (80,6%) sans administration d’anti-convulsivants ou de corticostéroïdes (82,1% et 86,6% respectivement). Nous avons constaté une absence de consensus en ce qui concerne la position du patient en décubitus dorsal après la chirurgie et l’utilisation d’antibiotiques dans les suites postopératoires.

Conclusion:

Notre enquête a identifié des différences dans le traitement de l’hématome sous-dural sub-aigu ou chronique par les neurochirurgiens canadiens. Ces constatations soulignent le besoin d’études prospectives et d’essais thérapeutiques pour résoudre ces différences dans la prise en charge et donc pour standardiser la prise en charge de ces affections.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2005

References

1. Fogelholm, R, Heiskanen, O, Waltimo, O. Chronic subduralhematoma in adults. Influence of patient's age on symptoms, signs, and thickness of hematoma. J Neurosurg 1975; 42:43-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Kostanian, V, Choi, JC, Liker, MA, Go, JL, Zee, CS. Computedtomographic characteristics of chronic subdural hematomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2000; 11:479-489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Prabhu, SS, Zauner, A, Bullock, MR. Chronic subdural hematoma. In: Winn, HR (Ed): Youmans Neurological Surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2003: 5170-5171.Google Scholar
4. Weigel, R, Schmiedek, P, Krauss, JK. Outcome of contemporarysurgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74:937-943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Decaux, O, Cador, B, Dufour, T, et al. Nonsurgical treatment ofchronic subdural hematoma with steroids: two case reports [inFrench]. Rev Med Interne 2002; 23:788-791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kotwica, Z, Brzeinski, J. Epilepsy in chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991; 113:118-120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Nakajima, H, Yasui, T, Nishikawa, M, Kishi, H, Kan, M. The role ofpostoperative patient posture in the recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Neurol 2002; 58:385-387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ohno, K, Maehara, T, Ichimura, K, et al. Low incidence of seizures inpatients with chronic subdural haematoma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56:1231-1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Rubin, G, Rappaport, ZH. Epilepsy in chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1993; 123:39-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Rudiger, A, Ronsdorf, A, Merlo, A, Zimmerli, W. Dexamethasonetreatment of a patient with large bilateral chronic subdural haematomata. Swiss Med Wkly 2001; 30;131:387.Google Scholar
11. Lensing, SY, Gillaspy, SR, Simpson, PM, Jones, SM, James, JM. Encouraging physicians to respond to surveys through the use offax technology. Eval Health Prof 2000; 23:349-360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Probst, C. Peritoneal drainage of chronic subdural hematomas inolder patients. J Neurosurg 1988; 68:908-911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Misra, M, Salazar, JL, Bloom, DM. Subdural-peritoneal shunt:treatment for bilateral chronic subdural hematoma. Surg Neurol 1996; 46(4):378-383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Okada, Y, Akai, T, Okamoto, K, et al. A comparative study of thetreatment of chronic subdural hematoma--burr-hole drainage versus burr-hole irrigation. Surg Neurol 2002; 57:405-409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kuroki, T, Katsume, M, Harada, N, et al. Strict closed-systemdrainage for treating chronic subdural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 43:1041-1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Markwalder, TM, Seiler, RW. Chronic subdural hematomas: to drainor not to drain? Neurosurgery 1985; 16:185-188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wakai, S, Hashimoto, K, Watanabe, N, et al. Efficacy of closed-system drainage in treating chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective comparative study. Neurosurgery 1990; 26:771-773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Rohde, V, Graf, G, Hassler, W. Complications of burr-holecraniostomy and closed-system drainage for chronic subdural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 376 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2002; 25:89-94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Sabo, RA, Hanigan, WC, Aldag, JC. Chronic subdural hematomas andseizures: the role of prophylactic anticonvulsive medication. Surg Neurol 1995; 43:579-582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Liliang, PC, Tsai, YD, Liang, CL, Lee, TC, Chen, HJ. Chronic subduralhaematoma in young and extremely aged adults: a comparative study of two age groups. Injury 2002; 3:345-348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Lee, JY, Ebel, H, Ernestus, RI, Klug, N. Various surgical treatments ofchronic subdural hematoma and outcome in 172 patients: is membranectomy necessary? Surg Neurol 2004; 61:523-527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar