Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:24:49.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunocytochemical Analysis of Intermediate Filaments in Human Ependymal Tumors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

D. Izukawa  and
B. Lach
D. Izukawa
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Ottawa Civic Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa
B. Lach*
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratory Medicine (Neuropathology), Ottawa Civic Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa
*
Department of Laboratory Medicine (Neuropathology), Ottawa Civic Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The peroxidase anti-peroxidase technique was used for localization of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin (VM) in 19 ependymal tumors in order to determine if a unique pattern of intermediate filament (IF) expression could be demonstrated. Cytokeratin (CK) immunoreactivity was examined in a subgroup of 7 tumors with papillary pattern. Nineteen non-ependymal neuroectodermal tumors were used as controls. Ependymomas, subependymomas and astrocytomas were positive for both IF. Oligodendrogliomas, oligodendroglial portions of mixed gliomas and the majority of medulloblastomas were negative for GFAP and VM. Areas of poor differentiation in all tumors demonstrated little expression of any IF. A composite ependymoma/choroid plexus papilloma showed the presence of GFAP, VM and CK in the papillomatous portion only. Four papillary ependymomas were negative for CK. This study emphasizes the parallel distribution of GFAP and VM in well differentiated ependymomas and other glial tumors and casts doubt upon the concept of VM as a marker for de-differentiation in neuroectodermal neoplasia.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 114 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1988

References

1.Dahl, D, Rueger, DC, Bignami, A. Vimentin, the 57,000 molecular weight protein of fibroblast filaments, is the major cytoskeletal component in immature glia. Europ J Cell Biol 1981; 24: 191–196.Google Scholar
2.Shaw, G, Osborne, M, Weber, K. An immunofluorescent microscopic study of neurofilament triplet proteins, vimentin and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the adult rat brain. Eur J Cell Biol 1981; 26: 68–82.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Schnitzer, J, Franke, WW, Schachner, M. Immunocytochemical demonstration of vimentin in astrocytes and ependymal cells in developing adult mouse nervous system. J Cell Biol 1981; 90: 435–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Yen, SH, Fields, KL. Antibodies to neurofilament, glial filament and fibroblast intermediate filament proteins bind to different cell types of the nervous system. J Cell Biol 1981; 88: 115–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Roessmann, U, Velasco, ME, Gambetti, P, et al. Vimentin intermediate filaments are increased in human neoplastic astrocytes. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1983; 42: 309 (A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Yung, WKA, Luna, M, Borit, A. Vimentin and glial fibrillary acidic protein in human brain tumors. J Neuro-Oncol 1985; 3: 35–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Schiffer, D, Diordana, MT, Mauro, A, et al. Immunocytochemical demonstration of vimentin in human cerebral tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berlin) 1986; 70: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Herpers, MJHM, Raemaekers, FSC, Aldeweireldt, J, et al. Co-expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin type intermediate filaments in human astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berlin) 1986; 70: 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Moll, R, Franke, WW, Schiller, DL, et al. Catalogue of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 1982; 31: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Kasper, M, Karsten, U, Stosiek, P. Detection of cytokeratin(s) in epithelium of human plexus choroideus by monoclonal antibodies. Acta Histochem 1986; 78: 101–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Miettinen, M, Clark, R, Virtanen, I. Intermediate filament proteins in choroid plexus and ependyma and their tumors. Am J Pathol 1986; 123: 231–240.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Coffin, CM, Wick, MR, Braun, JT, et al. Choroid plexus neoplasms, clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical studies. Am J Surg Pathol 1986; 10: 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Roessmann, U, Velasco, ME, Sindely, SD, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in ependymal cells during development. An immunocytochemical study. Brain Res 1980; 200: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Peters, A, Palay, SL, Webster, H de F. The fine structure of the nervous system: The neurons and supporting cells. Saunders (Philadelphia), 1976: 273.Google Scholar
15.Sternberger, LA. Immunocytochemistry. Second edition. John Wiley and Sons (New York). 1979.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Hsu, SM, Raine, L, Fanger, H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: A comparison between ABC and unlabelled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem 1981; 29: 577–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Mason, DY, Sammons, R. Alkaline phosphatase and peroxidase for double immunoenzymatic labelling of cellular constituents. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31: 454–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Malik, NJ, Daymon, ME. Improved double immunoenzyme label-ling using alkaline phosphatase and horseradish peroxidase. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 1092–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.McDowell, EM. Fixation and processing. In: Diagnostic Electron-microscopy. V.1, Trump, B.J. and Jones, R.T., eds., Wiley Medical Publications, New York, Toronto, 1978: 113–140.Google Scholar
20.Bonnin, JM, Rubinstein, LJ. Immunohistochemistry of central ner-vous system tumors. J Neurosurg 1984; 60: 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Osborn, M, Weber, K. Biology of disease: Tumor diagnosis by intermediate filament typing: A novel tool for surgical pathology. Lab Invest 1983; 48: 372–394.Google Scholar
22.Duffy, PE, Graf, L, Huang, YY, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein in ependymomas and other brain tumors. J Neurol Sci 1979; 40: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Deck, JH, Eng, LF, Bigbee, J, et al. The role of glial fibrillary acidic protein in the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berlin) 1978; 42: 183–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Sharp, G, Osborne, M, Weber, K. Occurrence of two different intermediate filament proteins in the same filament in situ within human glioma cell lines. Exp Cell Res 1982; 144: 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Kepes, JJ, Rubinstein, , Chiang, H. The role of astrocytes in the formation of cartilage in astrocytomas: An immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am J Pathol 1984; 117: 471–483.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Mathews, T, Moossy, J. Gliomas containing bone and cartilage. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1974; 33: 456–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Rubinstein, LJ, Brucher, JM. Focal ependymal differentiation in choroid plexus papillomas. An immunoperoxidase study. Acta Neuropathol (Berlin) 1981; 53: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Taratuto, AL, Molina, H, Monges, J. Choroid plexus tumors in infancy and childhood. Focal ependymal differentiation. Acta Neuropathol (Berlin) 1983; 59: 304–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed