Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T19:56:45.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamental Nature of Human Infant's Brain Asymmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Juhn A. Wada  and
Alan E. Davis
Juhn A. Wada*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Health Science Center Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
Alan E. Davis
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Health Science Center Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
*
2075 Wesbrook Place, U.B.C. Campus, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5 Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Morphological speech zone asymmetry in man cannot be due to environmental or developmental factors after birth. The functional implication of such a finding is not yet clear. Morphological asymmetry of the human brain is paralleled by electrophysiological evidence of cerebral hemispheric asymmetries. The results of our analysis of 50 infants suggest that clear occipital-temporal coherency asymmetry similar, but not identical to the adult pattern, also exists at or near birth. These asymmetries are generated by stimuli with no verbal content and in infants who presumably have no or an undeveloped capability for language. It is suggested that language is only a part of much more fundamental asymmetries which include the processing of auditory and visual information. Our results, and those of others, are consistent with the assumption that the left hemisphere is more able to relate stimuli to past experience, either short or long-term, while the right hemisphere is more able to process stimuli which are not easily identifiable or referable. These capabilities would not be based on language, and hence would be expected to develop independently and possibly before speech. The demonstration that reversing electrophysiological asymmetries can be generated with non-speech stimuli in the visual and auditory modalities, and in neonates, supports such an assumption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , August 1977 , pp. 203 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1977

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J.A. (1967). Human Memory. New-York; McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bartholomeus, B. (1974). Effects of task requirements on ear superiority for sung speech. Cortex, 10: 215–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bever, T.G. and Chiarello, R.J. (1974). Cerebral Dominance in Musicians and Non-musicians. Science 185: 137–139.Google Scholar
Bisiach, E. and Faglioni, P. (1974). Recognition of random shapes by patients with unilateral lesions as a function of complexity, association value and delay. Cortex 10/2: 101–110.Google Scholar
Boller, R. and De Renzi, E. (1967). Relationship between visual memory defects and hemispheric locus of lesion. Neurology 17: 1052–1058.Google Scholar
Buschbaum, M. and Fedio, P. (1970). Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and non-verbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields. Physiology & Behavior, 5: 207–210.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. (1973). Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97: 349–356.Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. (1973). Power spectral analysis of flash and click evoked responses. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 35: 287–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, A.E. and Wada, J.A. (1974). Hemispheric Asymmetry: Frequency analysis of visual and auditory evoked responses to non-verbal stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 37: 1–9.Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. (1975). Spectral Analysis of Human Evoked Potentials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. and Wada, J.A. (1976a). Hemispheric Asymmetries of Visual and Auditory Information Processing. Neuro-psychology: (accepted).Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. and Wada, J.A. (1976b). Hemispheric Asymmetries in Human Infants. Brain & Language: (accepted).Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. and Wada, J.A. (1976c). Lateralization of cerebral speech dominance by spectral analysis of evoked potentials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry: (accepted).Google Scholar
Davis, A.E. and Wada, J.A. (1976d). Speech dominance and handedness in the normal human. Brain and Language (submitted).Google Scholar
Diamond, S. and Beaumont, G. (1972). Processing in perceptual integration between and within the cerebral hemispheres. British Journal of Experimental Psychology 63: 509–514.Google Scholar
Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P. et al. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science 171: 303–306.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. and Levitsky, W. (1968). Left/right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science, 161: 186–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, N. (1970). The organization of language and the brain. Science 170: 940–944.Google Scholar
Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, D. (1969). Spatial localization in the left and right visual fields. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 23: 445–458.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1966). Speech development: Its anatomical and physiological concomitants. IN: The Brain Function. University of California Press, Berkeley. Vol. 3. pp. 37–66.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological Foundation of Language. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1970). Brain correlates of language. IN: Neurosciences: 2nd Study Program, pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
Levi-Agresti, J. and Sperry, R.W. (1968). Different perceptual capacities of major and minor hemispheres. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 61: 1151.Google Scholar
Low, M.D., Wada, J.A. and Fox, M. (1973). Electroencephalographic localization of connative aspects of language production in the human brain. Transactions of American Neurological Association 98: 129–133.Google Scholar
McAdam, D.W. and Wittaker, H.A. (1971). Language production: electrophysiological localization in the normal human brain. Science, 172: 499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumiya, Y., Tagliasco, V., Lombroso, C.T. and Goodglass, H. (1972). Auditory evoked response: Meaningfulness of stimuli and interhemis-pheric asymmetry. Science, 175: 790–792.Google Scholar
Molfese, D.L., Freeman, R.B. and Palermo, D.S.A. (1975). The ontogeny of brain lateralization for speech and non-speech stimuli. Brain and Language 2: 356–368.Google Scholar
Moffitt, A. (1971). Consonant cue perception by twenty to twenty-four-week old infants. Child Development 42: 717–731.Google Scholar
Morrell, L.K. and Huntington, D.A. (1971). Electrocortical localization of language production. Science, 174: 1359–1360.Google Scholar
Morrell, L.K. and Salamy, J.G. (1971) . Hemispheric asymmetry of electrocortical responses to speech stimuli. Science 174: 164–166.Google Scholar
Morse, P. (1972). The discrimination of speech and non-speech stimuli in early infancy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 14: 477–492.Google Scholar
Netley, C. (1972). Dichotic Listening Performance of Hemispherectomized Patients. Neuropsychologia 10: 233–240.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R.A. (1936). Pathologie des Hoerstrahlung duner der Corticalen Hoersphaere. IN: Bumke, O., Forester, O. (Eds.) Handbuch del Neurologic Berlin, Springer 6: 533–626.Google Scholar
Penfield, W. and Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton University Press, Princeton. New Jersey.Google Scholar
Sperry, R.W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. IN: Schmidt, O. Worden, F.G. (Eds). The Neurosciences: Third Study Program, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
Tezner, D. (1972). Etude anatomique de l’asymétrie droit-gauch de planum temporale sur 100 cerveaux d’adultes. (Thesis) Université de Paris.Google Scholar
Von Economo, C. and Horn, L. (1930). Ueber Windingrelief. Masse und Rinden-architek-tonik der supratemporalflache, ihre individuellen und ihre seitenun-terschiede.Google Scholar
Trehub, S. and Rabinovitch, S. (1972). Auditory-linguistic Sensitivity in Early Infancy. Developmental Psychology 6: 74–77.Google Scholar
Wada, J.A. (1949). A new method for the determination of the site of cerebral speech dominance: A preliminary report on the intracarotid injection of sodium amytal in man. Medicine and Biology 14: 221–222.Google Scholar
Wada, J.A. and Rasmussen, P.L. (1960). Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Journal of Neurosurgery 17: 262–282.Google Scholar
Wada, J.A. (1969). lnterhemispheric Sharing and Shift of Cerebral Speech Function. Excerpta Medica, International Congress Series 193: 296–297.Google Scholar
Wada, J.A., Clarke, R. and Hamm, A. (1975). Cerebral Hemispheric Asymmetry in Humans: Cortical Speech Zones in 100 Adult and 100 Infant Brains. Archives of Neurology 32: 239–246.Google Scholar
Witelson, S.F. and Pallie, W. (1973). Left hemisphere specialization for language in the newborn: Neuroanatomical evidence of asymmetry. Brain Research 96: 641–646.Google Scholar
Wood, C. and Goff, W.R. (1971). Auditory evoked potentials during speech perception. Science, 1973: 1248–1251.Google Scholar
Woods, B.T. and Teuber, , Hans-Leukas (1973). Early onset of complementary specialization of cerebral hemisphere in man. Paper presented at the 98th Annual American Neurological Association meeting, June 12, Montreal.Google Scholar