Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:32:31.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Status of Artificial Vision by Electrocortical Stimulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

John P. Girvin
John P. Girvin*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London
*
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The history of the provision of artificial vision by electrocortical stimulation has its origin in observations over 50 years ago. However, the realistic modern stimulation of human visual cortex is only 20-years-old. No useful device has been devised as yet and it therefore remains purely experimental. The primary objective of such a prosthetic device is that of independent mobility. This would require the appreciation of half-tone pictures, the detection of depth and discontinuities in outlines, and a significant quality of resolution. Some of the problems which threaten resolution in such a device and the factors which must be overcome in order to achieve a useful visual prosthesis are discussed.

Type
Special Supplement — Neurosurgical Symposium
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 58 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Krause, F. Die Sehbahnen in chirurgischer Beziehung und die faradische Reizung des Sehzentrums. Klin Wschr 1924; 3: 1260–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Foerster, O. Beitrage zur Pathophysiologie der Sehbahn und der Sehsphare. J Psychol Neurol Lpz 1929; 39: 463–485.Google Scholar
3.Krause, F, Schum, H. Die Epileptischen Erkrankungen. In: Kuttner, H, ed. Neue Deutsche Chirurgie. Enke, Stuttgart 1931; 49a; 482–486.Google Scholar
4.Penfield, W, Rasmussen, T. The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of localization of function 1950; New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Penfield, W, Jasper, H. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain 1954; Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
6.Krieg, WJS. Functional neuroanatomy. 2nd ed. Blakison Co., Evanston, 3 1953; 207–208.Google Scholar
7.Shaw, JD. Method and means for aiding the blind. United States Patent Number 2, 721, 316, 1955.Google Scholar
8.Button, J, Putnam, T. Visual responses to cortical stimulation in the blind. J Iowa Med Soc 1962; 52: 17–21.Google Scholar
9.Brindley, GS. The number of information channels needed for efficient reading. J Physiol 1964; 177: 44.Google Scholar
10.Brindley, GS. Transmission of electrical stimuli along many independent channels through a fairly small area of intact skin. J Physiol 1964; 177: 44–45.Google Scholar
11.Brindley, GS, Lewin, WS. The visual sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the medial occipital cortex. J Physiol 1968; 194: 54–55.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Brindley, GS, Lewin, WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol 1968; 196: 479–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Lewin, W. Towards a visual prosthesis. Clin Neurosurg 1971; 18: 155–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Holmes, G. Disturbances of vision by cerebral lesions. Br J Ophthalmol 1918; 2: 353–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Brindley, GS. Sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the occipital poles of the cerebral hemispheres, and their use in constructing visual prostheses. Ann R Coll Surg 1970; 47: 106–108.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Brindley, GS, Donaldson, PEK, Falconer, MA, et al. The extent of the region of occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field. J Physiol 1972; 225: 57–58.Google ScholarPubMed
17.Brindley, GS. Sensory effects of electrical stimulation of the visual and paravisual cortex in man. In: Jung, R, ed. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1973; 7/3B: 583–594.Google Scholar
18.Brindley, GS, Rushton, DN. Implanted stimulators of the visual cortex as visual prosthetic devices. Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974; 78: OP741–745.Google Scholar
19.Rushton, DN, Brindley, GS. Short- and long-term stability of cortical electrical phosphenes. In: Rose, FC, ed. Physiological Aspects of Clinical Neurology. NY Blackwell 1977; 123–153.Google Scholar
20.Eventi, BS, Rushton, DN. A method for plotting the optimum positions of an array of cortical electrical phosphenes. Biometrics 1978; 34: 399–410.Google Scholar
21.Donaldson, PEK. Experimental visual prosthesis. Proc IEE 1973; 120: 281–298.Google Scholar
22.Brindley, GS. Visual prostheses based on electrical stimulation of the human visual cortex. 17th Neural Prosthesis Workshop, NINCDS, NIH, October 17, 1986.Google Scholar
23.Sterling, TD, Bering, EA Jr, Pollack, SV, et al, eds. Visual prosthesis: the interdisciplinary dialogue. NY Academic Press 1971; 378.Google Scholar
24.Hambrecht, FT. Visual prostheses: theoretical objectives, present status and future possibilities. In: Fields, WS, Leavitt, LA, eds. Neural Organization and Its Relevance to Prosthetics. NY Intercontinental Medical Book Corp 1973; 281–291.Google Scholar
25.Pudenz, RH, Bullara, LA, Dru, D, et al. Electrical stimulation of the brain. II. Effects on the blood-brain barrier. Surg Neurol 1975; 4: 265.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Pudenz, RH, Bullara, LA, Jacques, S, et al. Electrical stimulation of the brain. III. The neural damage model. Surg Neurol 1975; 4: 389.Google ScholarPubMed
27.Bullara, LA, Agnew, WF, Yuen, TGH, et al. Evaluation of electrode array material for neural prostheses. Neurosurgery 1979; 5: 681–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Yuen, TGH, Agnew, WF, Bullara, LA, et al. Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application. Neurosurgery 1981, 9: 292.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Agnew, WF, Yuen, TGH, McCreery, DB. Morphological changes after prolonged electrical stimulation of the cat’s cortex at defined charge densities. Exp Neurol 1983; 79: 397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Dobelle, WH, Mladejovsky, M. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol 1974; 243: 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Dobelle, WH, Mladejovsky, MG, Girvin, JP. Artificial vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 1974; 183: 440–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Mladejovsky, MG, Eddington, DK, Dobelle, WH, et al. Artificial hearing for the deaf by cochlear stimulation: pitch modulation and some parametric thresholds. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1975; 21: 1–6.Google ScholarPubMed
33.Dobelle, WH, Mladejovsky, MG, Roberts, TS, et al. A percutaneous connector for chronic electrodes in man. ASAIO abstract, 1976.Google Scholar
34.Dobelle, WH, Mladejovsky, MG, Evans, JR, et al. “Braille” reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature 1976; 259: 111–112. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Girvin, JP, Evans, JR, Dobelle, WH, et al. Electrical stimulation of human visual cortex: the effect of stimulus parameters on phosphene threshold. Sensory Processes 1979; 3: 66–81.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Evans, JR, Gordon, J, Abramov, I, et al. Brightness of phosphenes elicited by electrical stimulation of human visual cortex. Sensory Processes 1979; 3: 82–94.Google ScholarPubMed
37.Scadden, L. Currently available mobility and reading aids for the blind. 17th Neural Prosthesis Workshop, NINCDS, NIH, October 17, 1986.Google Scholar
38.Adams, JE, Rutkins, BB. Visual responses to subcortical stimulation in the visual and limbic system. In: Sterling, TD, Bering, EA Jr, Pollack, SV, Vaughan, HJ Jr, eds. Visual Prosthesis: The Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Academic Press, New York, 1971; 49–55.Google Scholar
39.Chapanis, N, Uematsu, S, Konigsmark, B, et al. Central phosphenes in man: a report of three cases. Neuropsychologia 1973; 2: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Uematsu, S, Chapanis, N, Gucer, G, et al. Electrical stimulation of the cerebral visual system in man. Confin Neurol 1974; 36: 113–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Girvin, JP. Unpublished observations, 1976.Google Scholar
42.Stensaas, SS, Eddington, DK and Dobelle, WH. The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg 1974; 40: 747–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43.Girvin, JP. Artificial vision by occipital cortical electrical stimulation. In: Brackmann, DE, ed. Neurological Surgery of the Ear and Skull Base. NY Raven Press 1982; 185–190.Google Scholar