Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T21:06:05.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical Psychology Issues in Migraine Headaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Pain Service, IWK Grace Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The important developments in our understanding and harnessing the biology of migraine have not diminished the need to consider the psychology of migraine. Psychological treatments especially relaxation training and biofeedback have been well validated as effective in treating frequent migraine. When the frequency and severity of migraine warrants more than analgesics, these treatments are the first line treatment for adults who cannot or do not wish to take abortive or prophylactic medications and for adolescents. The use of psychological interventions to enhance compliance to treatment or treatment effects is an underutilized resource. Psychological measurement is also critical in development and understanding of quality of life scales and the examination of decision-making by patients in taking medication. Modern clinical psychology has much to offer in the study of migraine and the amelioration of suffering from this common problem.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉ

Les développements importants dans notre compréhension et notre maîtrise de la biologie de la migraine n’ont pas altéré la nécessité de considérer la psychologie de la migraine. Les traitements psychologiques, surtout l’entraînement à la relaxation et à la rétroaction biologique ont été validés adéquatement comme étant efficaces dans le traitement des accès fréquents de migraine. Quand la fréquence et la sévérité de la migraine justifie la prescription de médicaments autres que des analgésiques, ces traitements sont indiqués en première ligne pour les adultes qui ne peuvent pas ou ne veulent pas prendre un médicament faisant avorter la crise ou la prévenant et pour les adolescents. L’utilisation des interventions psychologiques pour augmenter la compliance au traitement ou les effets du traitement est une ressource sous utilisée. L’évaluation psychologique est également un aspect important pour le développement et la compréhension des échelles de qualité de vie et l’examen de la prise de décision par les patients qui prennent une médication. La psychologie clinique moderne a beaucoup à offrir à l’étude de la migraine et à l’amélioration du fardeau de souffrance dû à ce problème fréquent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , November 1999 , pp. 33 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 1999

References

1. Allen, KD, Shriver, MD. Role of parent-mediated pain behaviour management strategies in biofeedback treatment of childhood migraines. Behavior Therapy 1998; 29 (3):477–490 Google Scholar
2. Gauthier, J, Lacroix, R, Cote, A, Doyon, J, Drolet, M. Biofeedback control of migraine headaches: a comparison of two approaches. Biofeedback Self Regul 1985; 10(2):139–159.Google Scholar
3. Jacobson, E. Progressive Relaxation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
4. Schultz, JH, Luthe, W. Autogenic training: a psychophysiologic approach to psychotherapy. New York: Grune, Stratton, 1959.Google Scholar
5. Benson, H. Beyond the Relaxation Response. New York: Times Books, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Beck, AT. Depression: Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
7. Sullivan, MJL, Bishop, SR., Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7 (4):524–532.Google Scholar
8. Sorbi, M, Tellegen, B. Stress-coping in migraine. Soc Sci Med 1988; 24:351–358.Google Scholar
9. Holroyd, KA, France, JL, Cordingley, GE, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of relaxation-thermal biofeedback training with propranolol hydrochloride. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63: 327–330.Google Scholar
10. Blanchard, EB. Long term effects of behavioural treatment of chronic headache. Behavior Therapy 1987; 8:375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McGrath, PJ, Humphreys, P, Keene, D, Goodman, JT, Lascelles, MA, Cunningham, SJ, Firestone, P. The efficacy and efficiency of a self-administered treatment for adolescent migraine. Pain 1992; 49:321–324.Google Scholar
12. Kabela, E, Blanchard, EB, Appelbaum, KA, Nicholson, N. Self-regulatory treatment of headache in the elderly. Biofeedback and Self Regulation 1989; 14:219–228.Google Scholar
13. Hamalainen, ML, Hoppu, K, Santavuori, PR. Sumatriptan for migraine attacks in children: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (Do children with migraine respond differently to oral sumatriptan from adults?). Neurology 1997; 48:1100–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Mathew, NT. Prophylaxis of migraine and mixed headache: a randomized controlled study. Headache 1981; 21:105–109.Google Scholar
15. Holroyd, KA, France, JL, Cordingley, GE, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of relaxation-thermal biofeedback training with propranolol hydrochloride. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63: 327–330.Google Scholar
16. Packard, RC, O’Connell, P. Medication compliance among headache patients. Headache 1986; 26: 416–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Holroyd, KA, France, JL, Cordingley, GE, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of relaxation-thermal biofeedback training with propranolol hydrochloride. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63: 327–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Purdy, A, McGrath, PJ, Campbell, MA, Hennigar, AW. Decision-making in patients taking sumatriptan. Headache 1997; 37(5): 327.Google Scholar
19. Langveld, JH, Koot, HM, Loonen, CBAAJM, Hazebroek-Kampschreur, J, Passchier, ., A quality of life instrument for adolescents with chronic headache. Cephalagia 1996;16, 183–196.Google Scholar