Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:56:49.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carotid Stenting in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: The Calgary Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

N. Shobha ,
M. A. Almekhlafi ,
A. Pandya ,
P. L. Couillard ,
W. F. Morrish ,
J. H. Wong  and
M. D. Hill
N. Shobha
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
M. A. Almekhlafi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
A. Pandya
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
P. L. Couillard
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
W. F. Morrish
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
J. H. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
M. D. Hill*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
*
University of Calgary, Dept Clinical Neurosciences&Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Rm 1242A, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Although carotid endarterectomy is considered the ‘gold standard’ for standard risk symptomatic patients, the treatment of choice for asymptomatic patients remains controversial. Carotid stenting has demonstrated real-world outcomes consistent with established guidelines for carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic high-surgical risk patients in recent prospective multicenter trials. We describe our experience with asymptomatic patients who underwent carotid stenting at our center in a routine clinical setting.

Methods:

This is a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients who underwent carotid angioplasty and stenting at the Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Canada between 1997 and 2007. The qualifying events were categorized as symptomatic and asymptomatic. The procedures were performed by four experienced neurointerventionists. The primary outcome was stroke or death at 30-day follow- up.

Results:

243 patients underwent 255 carotid stenting procedures. Their ages ranged from 50 to 83 years; the mean age was 72.0 ± 9.3 years; 67(26.3%) were women. Forty one patients (16.1%) were asymptomatic; 214 patients (83.9%) were symptomatic. The patients in the asymptomatic group were significantly younger - 66.0 ± 8.8 years compared to patients in the symptomatic group 73.2 ± 8.9 years (p<0.0001). Intraprocedurally one minor stroke (2.4%) occurred in the asymptomatic group. At 30-day follow-up, no deaths or further strokes were noted in the asymptomatic group; while eight deaths, six major and seven minor strokes occurred in the symptomatic group (p=0.22).

Conclusion:

Carotid stenting appears to be a safe procedure in asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis in routine clinical settings as witnessed in this single center study.

Résumé:

RÉSUMÉ:Contexte:

Bien que l’endartérectomie carotidienne soit considérée comme la méthode de référence chez les patients symptomatiques à risque usuel, le traitement de choix chez les patients asymptomatiques demeure un sujet de controverse. Les résultats de la mise en place d’une endoprothèse carotidienne en pratique courante sont conformes aux lignes directrices établies pour l’endartérectomie carotidienne chez les patients asymptomatiques dont le risque chirurgical est élevé, qui ont participé à des essais multicentres prospectifs récents. Nous décrivons notre expérience chez des patients asymptomatiques qui ont subi une implantation d’endoprothèse de la carotide à notre centre hospitalier dans un contexte clinique de routine.

Méthodes:

Il s’agit d’une étude longitudinale rétrospective de cohorte de patients qui ont subi une angioplastie carotidienne avec implantation d’endoprothèse au Foothill Medical Center, à Calgary, au Canada, entre 1997 et 2007. Les événements qui motivaient l’intervention ont été classés selon la présence ou l’absence de symptomes. Quatre neurointerventionnistes expérimentés ont réalisé les interventions. L’issue primaire était l’accident vasculaire cérébral ou le décès au cours des trente premiers jours de suivi.

Résultats:

Deux cent quarante-trois patients ont subi 255 implantations d’endoprothèses. Les patients étaient àgés de 50 à 83 ans, avaient un àge moyen de 72,0 ± 9,3 ans, et 67 (26,3%) étaient des femmes. Quarante et un patients (16,1%) étaient asymptomatiques et 214 (83,9%) étaient symptomatiques. Les patients du groupe asymptomatique, dont l’àge moyen était de 66,0 ± 8,8 ans, étaient significativement plus jeunes par rapport aux patients du groupe symptomatique dont l’àge moyen était de 73,2 ± 8,9 ans (p < 0,0001). Un patient asymptomatique (2,4%) a subi un AVC mineur pendant l’intervention. Au moment du suivi 30 jours après l’intervention, aucun décès ou autre AVC n’a été observé dans le groupe de patients asymptomatiques alors que 8 décès, 6 AVC majeurs et 7 AVC mineurs sont survenus chez les patients du groupe symptomatique (p = 0,22).

Conclusion:

L’implantation d’une endoprothèse au niveau de la carotide semble une intervention sure chez les patients asymptomatiques qui sont porteurs d’une sténose sévère de la carotide dans un contexte de soins de routine, comme le témoigne cette étude réalisée dans un seul centre.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , September 2010 , pp. 568 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2010

References

1. Gorelick, PB, Sacco, RL, Smith, DB, et al. Prevention of a first stroke: a review of guidelines and a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the National Stroke Association. JAMA. 1999; 281:1112–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Meyers, PM, Schumacher, HC, Tanji, K, Higashida, RT, Caplan, LR. Use of stents to treat extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Annu Rev Med. 2007; 58:107–22.Google Scholar
3. Sacco, RL, Benjamin, EJ, Broderick, JP, et al. American Heart Association Prevention Conference IV. Prevention and rehabilitation of stroke risk factors. Stroke. 1997; 28:1507–17.Google Scholar
4. Chambers, BR, Norris, JW. Outcome in patients with asymptomatic neck bruits. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315:860–5.Google Scholar
5. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325:445–53.Google Scholar
6. Hobson, RW, Weiss, DG, Fields Goldstone, J, et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:221–7.Google Scholar
7. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273(18):1421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Halliday, A, Mansfield, A, Marro, J, et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 363:1491–502.Google Scholar
9. Perry, JR, Norris, JW. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54(7):799–800.Google Scholar
10. CAVATAS, Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet. 2001; 357(9270):1729–37.Google Scholar
11. Yadav, JS, Wholey, MH, Kuntz, RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351:1493–501.Google Scholar
12. SPACE Collaborative Group. Ringleb, PA, Allenberg, J, Brückmann, H, et al. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet.2006; 368: 1239–47.Google Scholar
13. Mas, JL, Chatellier, G, Beyssen, B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1660–71.Google Scholar
14. International Carotid Stenting Study investigators, Ederle, J, Dobson, J, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 375(9719):985–97.Google ScholarPubMed
15. Mas, JL, Trinquart, L, Leys, D, et al. Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7(10):885–92.Google Scholar
16. Gurm, HS, Yadav, JS, Fayad, P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(15):1572–9.Google Scholar
17. Bonati, LH, Ederle, J, McCabe, DJ, et al. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term followup of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8(10):908–17.Google Scholar
18. Chung, J, Shin, YS, Lim, YC, Park, SK. The clinical outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2009; 45(6): 350–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Gray, WA, Chaturvedi, S, Verta, P; Investigators and the Executive Committees. Thirty-day outcomes for carotid artery stenting in 6320 patients from 2 prospective, multicenter, high-surgical-risk registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2(3):159–66.Google Scholar
20. Oderich, GS. Commentary on “a review of the trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty and stenting”. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2008; 20(3):309–10.Google Scholar
21. Brott, TG, Hobson, RW, Howard, G, Roubin, GS, Clark, WM, Brooks, W, et al for the CREST Investigators. Stenting Compared to Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis. NEJM 2010; 363(1):11–23.Google Scholar
22. Hill, MD, Morrish, W, Soulez, G, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a self-expanding carotid stent system with distal protection in the treatment of carotid stenosis. AJNR. 2006; 27:759–65.Google Scholar
23. Coutts, SB, Hill, MD, Hu, WY. Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery. 2003 Nov; 53(5):1053–8.Google Scholar
24. Verzini, F, De Rango, P, Parlani, G, Panuccio, G, Cao, P. Carotid artery stenting: technical issues and role of operators’ experience. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2008; 20(3):247–57.Google Scholar
25. Gur, AY, Bova, I, Bornstein, NM. Is impaired cerebral vasomotor reactivity a predictive factor of stroke in asymptomatic patients? Stroke. 1996; 27:2188–90.Google Scholar
26. Reinhard, M, Müller, T, Guschlbauer, B, Timmer, J, Hetzel, A. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation and collateral flow patterns in patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29:1105–13.Google Scholar
27. Roubin, GS, New, G, Iyer, SS, et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation. 2001; 103(4):532–7.Google Scholar
28. White, CJ, Iyer, SS, Hopkins, LN, Katzen, BT, Russell, ME; BEACH Trial Investigators. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 67(4):503–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Katzen, BT, Criado, FJ, Ramee, SR, et al. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.2007; 70(2): 316–23.Google Scholar
30. Sidawy, AN, Zwolak, RM, White, RA, et al. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 49(1):71–9.Google Scholar
31. Aichner, FT, Topakian, R, Alberts, MJ, et al. High cardiovascular event rates in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the REACH Registry. Eur J Neurol. 2009; 16(8):902–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Wholey, MH, Wholey, M, Mathias, K, et al. Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 50(2):160–7.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Cremonesi, A, Manetti, R, Setacci, F, Setacci, C, Castriota, F. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke. 2003; 34:1936–41.Google Scholar