Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:29:13.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abnormal Electroretinograms and Visual Evoked Potentials in Chronic Papilledema Using Time-Difference Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

T.H. Kirkham*
Affiliation:
McGill University Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology and Neurosurgery and the Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology at the Montreal Neurological Hospital
S.G. Coupland
Affiliation:
McGill University Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology and Neurosurgery and the Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology at the Montreal Neurological Hospital
*
3801 Université, Suite 201, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2B4
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Visual function is usually considered to be normal in papilledema. We report previously undescribed abnormalities in the electroretinograms (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) of two patients with chronic papilledema. The steady-state latencies of the ERG and VEP were calculated using time-difference analysis. The ERG was abnormal under both scotopic (slow) and photopic (fast) flicker conditions, but the VEP was abnormal only to fast flicker photopic stimulation. This may indicate a relative vulnerability of a high frequency signal system under conditions of raised intracranial pressure. The abnormalities resolved rapidly once the intracranial pressure had been normalised. The cause of the V EP and particularly the ERG abnormalities remains unknown.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1981

References

REFERENCES

Bird, A.C. and Sanders, M.D., (1973): Choroidal folds in association with papilledema. Br. Ophthalmol, J., 57: 8997.Google Scholar
Coupland, S.G., (1978): Time-domain analysis of steady-state electroretinal and visual evoked response to intermittent photic stimulation. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Coupland, S.G., Taylor, M.J. and Koopman, R.F., (1980): EEG landscapes: An application of computer cartography. Psychophysiology, 17: 413417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, A.L., (1977, a): Latency of the steady state visual evoked potential. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol., 42: 125127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A.L., (1977, b): Phase-versus-time analysis of the steady-state evoked potential latency. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 67: 841842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galvin, R. and Sanders, M.D. (1980): Peripheral retinal haemorrhages with papilledema. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 64: 262266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G.J., Lessell, S. and Loewenstein, J.I., (1980): Ischemic optic neuropathy in chronic papilledema. Arch. Ophthalmol., 98: 502504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutrow-Tyler, J.F., Crews, S.J. and Drasdo, N., (1978): Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 17: 11241127.Google Scholar
Halliday, A.M. and Mushin, J., (1980): The visual evoked potential in neuro ophthalmology. In: Electrophysiology and psychophysics: their use in ophthalmic diagnosis. International Ophthalmology Clinics, 20: 155183.Google Scholar
Hayreh, S.S., (1977a): Optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. VI Associated visual disturbances and their pathogenesis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 95: 15661579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayreh, S.S., (1977, b): Optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. V Pathogenesis. Arch. Ophthalmol., 95: 15531565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keane, J.R., (1974): Sudden blindness after ventriculography. Bilateral retinal vascular occlusion superimposed on papilledema. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 78: 275278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keane, J.R., (1981): Papilledema with unusual ocular hemorrhages. Arch. Ophthalmol., 99: 262263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkham, T.H., (1973): Neuro-ophthalmic presentations of sarcoidosis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 66: 167169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korol, S. and Stangos, N., (1972): Les potentiels évoqués corticaux dans les affections du nerf optique. Rev. Oto-Neuro-Ophtalmol, 44: 387394.Google Scholar
Miller, R.F. and Dowling, J.E., (1970): Intracellular responses of the Muller cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to “b” wave of the electroretinogram. J. Neurophysiol., 33: 323341.Google ScholarPubMed
Morris, A.T. and Sanders, M.D. (1980): Macular changes resulting from papilledema. Br. J. Ophthalmol., 64: 211216.Google Scholar
Regan, D., (1968): A high frequency mechanism which underlies visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 25: 231237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regan, D., (1972): Evoked potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine. Chapman and Hale, London.Google Scholar
Rios-Montenegro, E.N., Anderson, D.R., and David, N.J., (1973): Intracranial pressure and ocular hemodynamics. Arch. Ophthalmol., 89: 5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, J.A., (1980): Pseudotumor cerebri. Clinical profile and visual outcome in 63 patients. Mayo Clin. Proc, 55: 541546.Google ScholarPubMed
Spekreijse, H., Estevez, O. and Reits, D., (1977): Visual evoked potentials and the physiological analysis of visual processes in man. In: Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. (Desmedt, J.E. ed). Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 1689.Google Scholar