Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:42:07.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Union of Realcompact Spaces and Lindelöf Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Akio Kato
Akio Kato*
Affiliation:
National Defense Academy, Yokosuka, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

All spaces in this paper are completely regular Hausdorff and all maps are continuous onto, unless otherwise stated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the realcompactness of a space X which contains a Lindelöf space L such that every zero-set Z (in X) disjoint from L is realcompact. We show in § 2 that such a space X is very close to being realcompact (Theorems I, II and III). But in general such a space fails to be realcompact. Indeed, in §§ 3 and 4 the following questions of Mrówka [18, 19] are answered, both in the negative:

(Q. 1) If X = L ∪ G where L is Lindelöf closed and G is E-compact, then is X E-compact?

(Q. 2) Suppose f:X → Y is a perfect map such that the set M(f) = {y ∊ Y| |f−l(y)| > 1} of multiple points of f is Lindelöf (especially, countable) closed. If X is E-compact, is Y also E-compact?

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1979 , pp. 1247 - 1268
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1979

References

1. Alo, R. A. and Shapiro, H. L., Normal topological spaces, Cambridge tracts in Mathematics 65 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1974).Google Scholar
2. Blair, R. L., On v-embedded sets in topological spaces, Proc. Second Pittsburgh Symposium on Gen. Top. (Pittsburgh, 1972) Lecture notes in Math. 378 (Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer, 1974), 46–79.Google Scholar
3. Spaces in which special sets are z-embedded, Can. J. Math. 28 (1976), 673–690.Google Scholar
4. Blair, R. L. and Hager, A. W., Extensions of zero-sets and of real-valued functions, Math. Z. 136 (1974), 41–52.Google Scholar
5. Dykes, N., Mappings and realcompact spaces, Pacific J. Math. 31 (1969), 347–358.Google Scholar
6. Generalizations of realcompact spaces, Pacific J. Math. 33 (1970), 571–581.Google Scholar
7. Engelking, R., Outline of general topology (North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York, 1968).Google Scholar
8. Frolik, Z., A generalization of realcompact spaces, Czechoslovak Math. J. 13 (88) (1963), 127–138.Google Scholar
9. Frolik, Z., Realcompactness is a Baire-measurable property, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 19 (1971), 617–621.Google Scholar
10. Gillman, L. and Jerison, M., Rings of continuous functions (Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960).Google Scholar
11. Herrlich, H. and van der Slot, J., Properties which are closely related to compactness, Indag. Math. 29 (1967), 524–529.Google Scholar
12. Henriksen, M. and Johnson, D. G., On the structure of a class of archimedean lattice-ordered algebras, Fund. Math. 50 (1961), 73–94.Google Scholar
13. Kato, A., Various countably-compact-ifications and their applications, Gen. Top. Appl. 8 (1978), 27–46.Google Scholar
14. Mack, J., Rayburn, M. C. and Woods, G., Lattices of topological extensions, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 189 (1974), 163–174.Google Scholar
15. Misra, A. K., A topological view of P-spaces, Gen. Top. Appl. 2 (1972), 349–362.Google Scholar
16. Moran, W., Measures on metacompact spaces, Proc. London Math. Soc. 20 (1970), 23–40.Google Scholar
17. Mrówka, S., Further results on E-compact spaces I, Acta Math. 120 (1968), 161–185.Google Scholar
18. Mrówka, S., Some comments on the author's example of a non-R-compact space, Bull. Acad. Polo. Sci. 18 (1970), 443–448.Google Scholar
19. Mrówka, S., Recent results on E-compact spaces and structures of continuous functions, Proc. Univ. of Oklahoma Topology Conference 1972, 168–221.Google Scholar
20. Mrówka, S., Some set-theoretic constructions in topology, Fund. Math. 94 (1977), 83–92.Google Scholar
21. van der Slot, J., A survey of realcompactness, Theory of sets and topology, Berlin (1972), 473–494.Google Scholar
22. Steen, L. A. and Seebach, J. A., Jr., Counterexamples in topology (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1970).Google Scholar
23. Strauss, D. P., Extremally disconnected spaces, Proc. A.M.S. 18 (1967), 305–309.Google Scholar
24. Terada, T., New topological extension properties, Proc. A.M.S. 67 (1977), 162–166.Google Scholar
25. Wheeler, R. E., On separable z-filters, Gen. Top. Appl. 5 (1975), 333–345.Google Scholar
26. Walker, R. C., The Stone-Cech compactifications, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 83 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1974).Google Scholar