Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T15:47:29.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological Localization, Category and Cocategory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Graham Hilton Toomer
Graham Hilton Toomer*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is easy to see that a localization (in the sense of [9]) of a simply connected co H-space (equivalently a simply connected space of Liusternik-Schnirelman category one) is again a co H-space. (All spaces in this paper will be pointed and have the based homotopy type of a connected CW complex; and all maps will preserve base-points.) We show that the category of a simply connected space does not increase on localizing. We give an example to show that the hypothesis simple-connectivity is crucial. In strong contrast, the dual result only requires connectivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1975 , pp. 319 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1975

References

1. Berstein, I. and Hilton, P. J., Category and generalized Hopf invariants, Illinois J. Math. 4 (1960), 437–451.Google Scholar
2. Bousfield, A. K. and Kan, D. M., Homotopy limits, completions and localizations, Springer Lectures Notes No. 304.Google Scholar
3. Ganea, T., Liusternik-Schnirelmann category and strong category, Illinois J. Math. 11 (1967), 417–427.Google Scholar
4. Ganea, T., A generalization of the homology and homotopy suspension, Comment. Math. Helv. 89 (1967), 295–322.Google Scholar
5. Ganea, T., Sur quelques invariants numériques du type d'homotopie, Thèse, Faculté des Sciences de Paris, Mai, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Ganea, T., Some problems on numerical homotopy invariants, Springer Lecture Notes No. 249.Google Scholar
7. James, I. M., Reduced product spaces, Ann. of Math. 62 (1955), 170–197.Google Scholar
8. Serre, J.-P., Homologie singulière des espaces fibres, Applications, Ann. of Math. S4- (1951), 425–505.Google Scholar
9. Sullivan, D., Geometric topology, Part I, M.I.T., mimeographed notes, June, 1970.Google Scholar
10. Svarc, A. S., The genus of a fibre space, Amer. Math. Soc. Transi. 55 (1966), 49–140.Google Scholar