Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:06:10.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tail Bounds for the Stable Marriage of Poisson and Lebesgue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Christopher Hoffman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA email: [email protected]
Alexander E. Holroyd
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2 email: [email protected]
Yuval Peres
Affiliation:
Microsoft Research, 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052, USA, and Departments of Statistics and Mathematics, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let $\Xi $ be a discrete set in ${{\mathbb{R}}^{d}}$. Call the elements of $\Xi $centers. The well-known Voronoi tessellation partitions ${{\mathbb{R}}^{d}}$ into polyhedral regions (of varying volumes) by allocating each site of ${{\mathbb{R}}^{d}}$ to the closest center. Here we study allocations of ${{\mathbb{R}}^{d}}$ to $\Xi $ in which each center attempts to claim a region of equal volume $\alpha $.

We focus on the case where $\Xi $ arises from a Poisson process of unit intensity. In an earlier paper by the authors it was proved that there is a unique allocation which is stable in the sense of the Gale–Shapley marriage problem. We study the distance $X$ from a typical site to its allocated center in the stable allocation.

The model exhibits a phase transition in the appetite $\alpha $. In the critical case $\alpha \,=\,1$ we prove a power law upper bound on $X$ in dimension $d\,=\,1$. (Power law lower bounds were proved earlier for all $d$). In the non-critical cases $\alpha <1$ and $\alpha \,>1$we prove exponential upper bounds on $X$.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2009

References

[1] Feller, W., An introduction to probability theory and its applications. II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[2] Gale, D. and Shapley, L., College admissions and stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1962), no. 1, 9–15.Google Scholar
[3] Hoffman, C., Holroyd, A. E., and Peres, Y., A stable marriage of Poisson and Lebesgue. Ann. Probab. 34(2006), no. 4, 1241–1272.Google Scholar
[4] Holroyd, A. E., Pemantle, R., Peres, Y., and Schramm, O., Poisson matching. To appear in Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Sect. B.Google Scholar
[5] Holroyd, A. E. and Peres, Y., Extra heads and invariant allocations. Ann. Probab. 33(2005), no. 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
[6] Kallenberg, O., Foundations of modern probability. Second edition. Probability and its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
[7] Liggett, T. M., Tagged particle distributions or how to choose a head at random. In: In and Out of Equilibrium. Progr. Probab. 51, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 2002, pp. 133–162.Google Scholar