Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:35:35.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Partitioning Projective Geometries into Caps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gary L. Ebert*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [2] by means of a fairly lengthy argument involving Hermitian varieties it was shown that PG(2n, q2) can be partitioned into (q2n++ 1 + 1)/(q + l)-caps. Moreover, these caps were shown to constitute the “large points” of a PG(2n, q) in a natural way. In [3] a similar argument was used to show that once two disjoint (n – l)-subspaces are removed from PG(2n, q2), the remaining points can be partitioned into (q2n – 1)/(q2 – l)-caps.

The purpose of this paper is to give a short proof of the results found in [2], and then use the technique developed to partition PG(2n, q) into (qn + l)-caps for n even and q any prime-power. Moreover, these caps can be treated in a natural way as the “large points” of a PG(n – 1, q).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1985

References

1. Barlotti, A., Un'estensione del teorema di Segre-Kustaanheimo, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 10 (1955), 498506.Google Scholar
2. Kestenband, B. C., Projective geometries that are disjoint unions of caps, Can. J. Math. 32 (1980), 12991305.Google Scholar
3. Kestenband, B. C., Hermitian configurations in odd-dimensional projective geometries, Can. J. Math. 33 (1981), 500512.Google Scholar
4. Qvist, B., Some remarks concerning curves of the second degree in a finite plane, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. 734 (1952), 127.Google Scholar