Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:14:29.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Tauberian Theorems from Old

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Mangalam R. Parameswaran*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T2N2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new and very general and simple, yet powerful approach is introduced for obtaining new Tauberian theorems for a summability method V from known Tauberian conditions for V, where V is merely assumed to be linear and conservative. The technique yields the known theorems on the weakening of Tauberian conditions due to Meyer-König and Tietz and others and also improves many of them. Several new results are also obtained, even for classical methods of summability, including analogues of Tauber's second theorem for the Borel and logarithmic methods. The approach yields also new Tauberian conditions for the passage from summability by a method V to summability by a method V', as well as to more general methods of summability like absolute summability or summability in abstract spaces; the present paper however confines itself to ordinary summability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1994

References

1. Borwein, D., A Tauberian theorem concerning Borel-type and Riesz summability methods, Canad. Math. Bull. 35(1992), 1420.Google Scholar
2. Borwein, D. and Robinson, I. J. W., A Tauberian theorem for Borel-type methods ofsummability, J. Reine Angew. Math. 273(1975), 153164.Google Scholar
3. Goes, G., Bounded variation sequences of order k and the representation of null sequences,1. Reine Angew. Math. 253(1972), 152161.Google Scholar
4. Ishiguro, K., Tauberian theorems concerning the summability by methods of logarithmic type, Proc. Japan Acad. (3)39(1963), 156159.Google Scholar
5. Jakimovski, A., On a Tauberian theorem by O. Szasz, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5(1954), 6770.Google Scholar
6. Karamata, J., Sur les théorèmes inverses des procédés de sommabilité, Paris, Hermann, 1937.Google Scholar
7. Kaufman, B. L., O teoremakh tipa Taubera dlya logarifmiceskikh metodov summirovaniya, in Russian, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. (56) 1(1967), 5762.Google Scholar
8. Kuttner, B. and Parameswaran, M. R., A Tauberian theoremfor Bore l summability, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 102(1987), 135138.Google Scholar
9. Kuttner, B. and Parameswaran, M. R., A product theorem anda Tauberian theorem for Euler methods,]. London Math. Soc. (2) 18(1978), 299304.Google Scholar
10. Kwee, B., Some Tauberian theorems for the logarithmic method of summability, Canad. J. Math. 20(1968), 13241331.Google Scholar
11. Kwee, B., The relation between the Borel and Riesz methods of summation, Bull. London Math. Soc. 21 (1989), 287393.Google Scholar
12. Leviatan, D., Remarks on some Tauberian theorems ofMeyer-Konig, Tietz andStieglitz, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 29(1971), 126132.Google Scholar
13. Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., On Tauberian conditions of type o, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73(1967), 926- 927.Google Scholar
14. Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., liber die Limitierungsumkehrsatze vom typ o, Studia Math. 31(1968), 205216.Google Scholar
15 Meyer-Konig, W. and Tietz, H., liber Umkehrbedingungen in der Limitierungstheorie, Arch. Math. (Brno) 5(1969), 177186.Google Scholar
16. Parameswaran, M. R., On a generalization of a theorem ofMeyer-Konig, Math. Z. 162(1975), 201204.Google Scholar
17. Parameswaran, M. R., Some Tauberian theorems related to the logarithmic methods of summability, Glas. Mat. 12(1977), 299303.Google Scholar
18. Parameswaran, M. R., Some remarks on Borel summability, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 10(1959), 224229.Google Scholar
19. Rangachari, M. S. and Y. Sitaraman, Tauberian theorems for logarithmic summability (L), Tôhoku Math. J. 16(1964), 257269.Google Scholar
20. Stieglitz, M., Uber ausgezeichnete Tauber-Matrizen, Arch. Math. (Brno) 5(1969), 227233.Google Scholar
21. Szasz, O., A generalization of two theorems of Hardy and Littlewood, Duke Math. J. 1(1935), 105111.Google Scholar
22. Tietz, H., Uber Umkehrbedingungen bei gewohnlicher und absoluter Limitierung, Studia Math. 80(1984), 4752.Google Scholar
23. Tietz, H., Negative Resultate uber Tauber-Bedingungen, Monatsh. Math. 75( 1971), 6978.Google Scholar