Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:27:03.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mallows permutations as stable matchings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

Omer Angel
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]@bristol.ac.uk
Alexander E. Holroyd
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom e-mail: [email protected]@bristol.ac.uk
Tom Hutchcroft*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Avi Levy
Affiliation:
Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, United States e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that the Mallows measure on permutations of $1,\dots ,n$ arises as the law of the unique Gale–Shapley stable matching of the random bipartite graph with vertex set conditioned to be perfect, where preferences arise from the natural total ordering of the vertices of each gender but are restricted to the (random) edges of the graph. We extend this correspondence to infinite intervals, for which the situation is more intricate. We prove that almost surely, every stable matching of the random bipartite graph obtained by performing Bernoulli percolation on the complete bipartite graph $K_{{\mathbb Z},{\mathbb Z}}$ falls into one of two classes: a countable family $(\sigma _n)_{n\in {\mathbb Z}}$ of tame stable matchings, in which the length of the longest edge crossing k is $O(\log |k|)$ as $k\to \pm \infty $ , and an uncountable family of wild stable matchings, in which this length is $\exp \Omega (k)$ as $k\to +\infty $ . The tame stable matching $\sigma _n$ has the law of the Mallows permutation of ${\mathbb Z}$ (as constructed by Gnedin and Olshanski) composed with the shift $k\mapsto k+n$ . The permutation $\sigma _{n+1}$ dominates $\sigma _{n}$ pointwise, and the two permutations are related by a shift along a random strictly increasing sequence.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2020

Footnotes

This work was carried out while O.A. was visiting and T.H. was an intern at Microsoft Research, Redmond. O.A. was supported in part by NSERC. T.H. was also supported by a Microsoft Research Ph.D. Fellowship.

References

Amir, G., Angel, O, and Valkó, B., The TASEP speed process. Ann. Probab. 39(2011), 12051242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOP561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, R. and Bhatnagar, N., Limit theorems for longest monotone subsequences in random Mallows permutations . Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 53(2017), 19341951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/16-AIHP777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, I., Berger, N., Hoffman, C., and Mossel, E., Mixing times of the biased card shuffling and the asymmetric exclusion process . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(2005), 30133029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03610-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, N. and Peled, R., Lengths of monotone subsequences in a Mallows permutation . Probab. Theory Related Fields 161(2015), 719780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-014-0559-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, M. and Mossel, E., Sorting from noisy information . Preprint, 2009. arxiv.org/0910.1191Google Scholar
Diaconis, P. and Ram, A., Analysis of systematic scan Metropolis algorithms using Iwahori-Hecke algebra techniques. Michigan Math. J. 48(2000), 157190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1030132713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler, L., Evolutio producti infiniti $(1 - x)(1 - xx)(1 - x^{3})(1 - x^{4})(1-x^{5}) $ etc. in seriem simplicem. In: Acta Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitinae, 1783, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
Gale, D. and Shapley, L. S., College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1962), 915. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2312726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladkich, A. and Peled, R., On the cycle structure of Mallows permutations . Ann. Probab. 46(2018), 11141169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/17-AOP1202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, A. and Olshanski, G., q-Exchangeability via quasi-invariance . Ann. Probab. 38(2010), 21032135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-AOP536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnedin, A. and Olshanski, G., The two-sided infinite extension of the Mallows model for random permutations . Adv. Appl. Math. 48(2012), 615639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2012.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H. and Ramanujan, S., Asymptotic formulaae in ccombinatory analysis . Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 17(1918), 75115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/plms/s2-17.1.75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, A. E., Hutchcroft, T., and Levy, A., Mallows permutations and finite dependence . Ann. Probab. 48(2020), 343379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/19-AOP1363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, A. E. and Martin, J. B., Stochastic domination and comb percolation. Electron. J. Probab. 19(2014), no. 5, 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/EJP.v19-2806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, K., The length of the longest common subsequence of two independent Mallows permutations . Ann. Appl. Probab. 29(2019), 13111355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/17-AAP1351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallows, C. J., Non-null ranking models. I . Biometrika 44(1957), 114130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, C. and Starr, S., The length of the longest increasing subsequence of a random Mallows permutation . J. Theor. Probab. 26(2013), 514540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10959-011-0364-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, S., Thermodynamic limit for the Mallows model on Sn . J. Math. Phys. 50(2009), no. 9, 095208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3156746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, S. and Walters, M., Phase uniqueness for the Mallows measure on permutations . J. Math. Phys. 59(2018), 063301, 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5017924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar