Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:51:20.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local-Global Criteria for Outer Product Rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Dennis R. Estes  and
Jacob R. Matijevic
Dennis R. Estes
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Jacob R. Matijevic
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R be a commutative ring with multiplicative identity. We say that R is an outer product ring (OP-ring) if each vector v in the exterior power ⋀nRn+1 is decomposable; i.e. v = v1 ⋀ v2 ⋀ … ⋀ vn with vi ∈ Rn+1 (alternatively, each n + 1 tuple of elements in R is the tuple of n × n minors of some n × (n + 1) matrix with entries in R).

Lissner initiated the study of which commutative rings are OP-rings, showing that any Dedekind domain is an OP-ring [13]. Towber classified the local Noetherian OP-rings as those with maximal ideal generated by two elements, and Hinohara's reformulation of Towber's result extended the context to semi-local rings [18, 11]. Assuming the stronger condition that all Pliicker vectors are decomposable and designating such rings as Towber rings, Lissner and Geramita gave necessary conditions for a Noetherian ring to be a Towber ring [14].

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1980 , pp. 1353 - 1360
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1980

References

1. Boratyński, M., Davis, E. D. and Geramita, A. V., Complete decomposability in the exterior algebra of a free module, to appear in Can. J. Math.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boratyński, M., Davis, E. D. and Geramita, A. V., Generations for certain ideals in regular polynomial rings of dimension three, J. of Alg. 51 (1978), 320–325.Google Scholar
3. Davis, E. D. and Geramita, A. V., Efficient generation of maximal ideals in polynomial rings, Trans. A.M.S. 231 (1977), 497–505.Google Scholar
4. Eisenbud, D. and Evans, E. G., Generating modules efficiently: theorems from algebraic K-theory, J. of Alg. 27 (1973), 278–305.Google Scholar
5. Eisenbud, D. and Evans, E. G., Three conjectures about modules over polynomial rings, Conference on Commutative Algebra (Lawrence, Kansas, 1972), Lecture Notes in Math. 311 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York), 78–89.Google Scholar
6. Endo, S., Projective modules over polynomial rings, J. Math. Soc. Japan 15 (1963), 339–352.Google Scholar
7. Estes, D. R. and Matijevic, J. R., Matrix factorization, exterior powers, and complete intersections, J. of Alg. 58 (1979), 117–135.Google Scholar
8. Ferrand, D., Les modules projectifs de type fini sur un anneau de polynomes sur un corps sont liberes, Seminar Bourbaki, Lecture Notes in Math. 567 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York), 1977.Google Scholar
9. Geramita, A. V., Polynomial rings with the outer product property, Can. J. Math. 24 (1972), 866–872.Google Scholar
10. Geramita, A. V. and Weibel, C. A., Ideals with trivial conormal bundle, (preprint).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hinohara, Y., On semilocal OP-rings, Proc. A.M.S. 32 (1972), 16–20.Google Scholar
12. Mohan, Kumar N., On two conjectures about polynomial rings, Inv. Math. 46 (1978), 225–236.Google Scholar
13. Lissner, D., Outer product rings, Trans. A.M.S. 116 (1965), 526–535.Google Scholar
14. Lissner, D. and Geramita, A. V., Towber rings, J. of Alg. 15 (1970), 13–40.Google Scholar
15. Sathaye, A., On the Forster-Eisenbud-Evans conjecture, Inv. Math. 46 (1978), 211–224.Google Scholar
16. Swan, R. G., Algebraic K-theory, Lecture Notes in Math. 76 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1968).Google Scholar
17. Towber, J., Complete reducibility in exterior algebras over free modules, J. of Alg. 10 (1968), 299–309.Google Scholar
18. Towber, J., Local rings with the outer product property, Ill. J. Math. 14 (1970), 194–197.Google Scholar