Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:10:08.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boundedness Criteria for Generalized Hankel Conjugate Transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

R. A. Kerman*
Affiliation:
Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper completes a study, begun in [7], of conditions under which a generalized Hankel conjugate transformation Hƛ is bounded between a pair of μα -rearrangement invariant function spaces, the measure μα being defined by dμα(t) = tα∼1dt. Examples of such spaces are the Lp(μα) of Lebesgue and generalizations of them due respectively to Orlicz and Lorentz.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1978

References

1. Andersen, K. F., On Hardy's inequality and Laplace transforms in weighted rearrangement invariant spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (1973), 295297.Google Scholar
2. Boyd, D. W., The Hilbert transform on rearrangement-invariant spaces, Can. J. Math. 19 (1967), 599616.Google Scholar
3. Boyd, D. W., Spaces between a pair of reflexive Lebesgue spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 215219.Google Scholar
4. Boyd, D. W., The spectral radius of averaging operators, Pac. J. Math. 24 (1968), 1928.Google Scholar
5. Boyd, D. W., Indices of function spaces and their relationship to interpolation, Can. J. Math. 21 (1969), 12451254.Google Scholar
6. Boyd, D. W., Indices for the Orlicz spaces, Pac. J. Math. 38 (1971), 315323.Google Scholar
7. Kerman, R. A., Generalized Hankel conjugate transformation on rearrangement invariant spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 232 (1977), 111130.Google Scholar
8. Muckenhoupt, B. and Stein, E. M., Classical expansions and their relationship to conjugate harmonic functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1965), 1792.Google Scholar