We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Allen, Baibara J., Gardiner, Donna, and Frantz, Donald G.1984Noun Incorporation in Southern Tiwa. International Journal of American Linguistics50:292–311.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, William, Foster, Michael S., and Koerner, Konrad, eds. 1986New Perspectives in Language, Culture and Personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference (Ottawa, October 1-3, 1984). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives1975Algonquian, Wiyot, and Yurok: Proving a Distant Genetic Relationship. Pp. 249–262 in Linguistics and Anthropology in Honor of CF. Voegelin. Kinkade, M. Dale, Hale, Kenneth L., and Werner, Oswald, eds. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R.1958Algonquian-Ritwan: The End of a Controversy. International Journal of American Linguistics24:159–173.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L., 1910Noun Incorporation in American Languages. Pp. 569–576 in Verhandlungen der XVI Amerikanisten-Kongresses. Vienna.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L.1911Incorporation as a Linguistic Process. American Anthropologist n.s. 13:577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, David G., ed. 1949Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, Truman1914Two Alleged Algonquian Languages of California. American Anthropologist16:361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Truman1915Rejoinder to Edward Sapir’s “Algonkin Languages of California: A Reply.” American Anthropologist17:194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne1984The Evolution of Noun Incorporation. Language60:847–894.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M.1980Noun Incorporation in Greenlandic. Language56:300–319.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1911The Problem of Noun Incorporation in American Indian Languages. American Anthropologist13:250–282.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1913a Southern Paiute and Náhuatl, A Study in Uto-Aztekan, Part I. Journal de la Société des américanistes de Paris10: 379–425.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1913b Wiyot and Yurok, Algonkin Languages of California. American Anthropologist15:617–646.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1914- Southern Paiute and Náhuatl, A Study in Uto-Aztekan, Part II. Journal de la Société des américanistes de Paris1. 443–488; American Anthropologist 17 (1915):98-120.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1915Algonkin Languages of California: A Reply. American Anthropologist17:188–194.Google Scholar
1916Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A Study in Method. Memoir 90, Anthropological Series13, Geological Survey. Department of Mines, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1921A Bird’s-Eye View of American Languages North of Mexico. Science54:408.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1929a Central and North American Languages. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed. 5:138–141.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1929b Male and Female Forms of Speech in Yana. Pp. 79–85 in Donum Natalicium Schrijnen. Teeuwen, St.W.J., ed. Nijmegen-Utrecht: N.v. Dekker fe van de Vegt.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward1949The Psychological Reality of Phonemes. Pp. 46–60 in Selected Writings of Edward Sapir. Mandelbaum, David G., ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.1935The Comparative Linguistics of Uto-Aztecan. American Anthropologist37:600–608.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L., and Trager, George L.1937The Relationship of Uto-Aztecan and Tanoan. American Anthropologist39:609–624.Google Scholar