Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:56:33.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syllable Structure: The Speech Error Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Ann Stuart Laubstein
Ann Stuart Laubstein*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A competence grammar of English must account for the English speaker’s ability to predict the shape of the regular past tense morpheme on the basis of the stem-final segment, faced, for example, with a neologistic verb like *rolk or *glag. But whether efficient processing of known words routinely utilizes this creative ability is another matter. Efficient on-line processing may favour selection from a store over computation. To what extent selection and computation are balanced in on-line production may even be different from the balance required in efficient comprehension.

It would appear therefore that not only is behaviour not a criterion for possession of knowledge — it is in fact only one kind of evidence for it — but also that the constructs required in characterizing competence cannot serve as the only criteria for determining the forms of processing. The evidence from both domains can support but not disconfirm the hypotheses of the other. Nevertheless, the grammars being produced within the generative paradigm are beginning to have the requisite richness of detail that must underly the capacity for language use. As such they provide independently motivated and sufficiently elaborate hypotheses regarding the structures and processes underlying production, allowing the production theorist a preliminary distinction between crucial facts and those best considered irrelevant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 339 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boomer, D.S., and Laver, J.D. 1968 Slips of the Tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3:1–12.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. 1980 Perceptual Processing Evidence from Slips of the Ear. Pp. 213–231 in Errors in Linguistic Performance, Fromkin, Victoria A., ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clements, George, and Keyser, Samuel 1983 CV Phonology — A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crompton, Andrew 1983 Syllables and Segments in Speech Production. Linguistics 19:663–716.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne 1980 Errors of Stress and Intonation. Pp. 67–80 in Errors in Linguistic Performance, Fromkin, Victoria A., ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne 1981 The Reliability of Speech Error Data. Linguistics 19:561–582.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne, ed. 1982 Slips of the Tongue and Language Production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dell, George S. 1986 A Spreading Activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production. Psychological Review 93:283–321.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A. 1971 The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances. Language 47:27–52.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A. 1973 Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fudge, Erik 1969 Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5:253–286.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu, and Lovins, Julie B. 1982 Syllables as Concatenative Phonetic Units. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill 1976 Syntactic Processes in Sentence Production. Pp. 231–255 in New Approaches to Language Mechanisms, Wales, Roger J. and Walker, Edward C.T., eds. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill 1980 Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. Pp. 197–220 in Language Production: Volume 1: Speech and Talk, Butterworth, Brian, ed. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill 1982 Production of Speech: Observations from Normal and Pathological Use. Pp. 19–76 in Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions, Ellis, Andrew W., ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Mymon 1968 Some Slips of the Tongue. Psychological Reports 22:1009–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halle, Morris, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger 1980 Three Dimensional Phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1:83–105.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel 1976 Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1979 Metrical Structure Assignment is Cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10:521–541.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, V.A., and Chistovich, L.A. 1965 Speech: Articulation and Perception. Joint Publications Research Service 30, 543 (revised). Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Laubstein, Ann Stuart 1985 The Nature of the ‘Production Grammar’ Syllable. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald G. 1970 Spoonerisms: The Structure of Errors in the Serial “Order of Speech”. Neuropsychologia 8:323–350.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John 1979 On Stress and Syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry 10:443–465.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur 1986 The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984 Phonology and Syntax — The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie 1984 A ‘Slot-and-Filler’ Model of Serial Ordering of Speech Production. Paper presented at Symposium on Motor and Sensory Language Processes, Montreal.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. 1982 Segments in the Lexicon. Lingua 56:235–259.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph 1983 The Nature of /r/ and /l/ in English: Evidence from Speech Errors. Journal of Phonetics 11:139–147.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph 1985 An Interactive Activation Model of Language Production. Pp. 143–186 in Progress in the Psychology of Language, Ellis, Andrew W., ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P., and Treiman, Rebecca 1986 The Internal Structure of Word-Initial Consonant Clusters. Journal of Memory and Language 25:163–180.Google Scholar
Tent, J., and Clark, J.F. 1980 An Experimental Investigation into the Perception of Slips of the Tongue. Journal of Phonetics 7:317–325.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca 1983 The Structure of Spoken Syllables: Evidence from Novel Word Games. Cognition 15:49–74.Google Scholar