No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
St’át'imcets intonation contours: a preliminary study*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2016
Abstract
Acoustic research on the prosody and intonation of Northwest Coast languages has until recently been under-researched. This paper joins the growing body of research on the subject and reports on the results of the first study of intonation in St’át'imcets (Lillooet Salish; Northern Interior Salish). It tests the generalization proposed by Davis (2007) that information structure is not correlated with prosody in Salish languages by comparing the intonation contours of declaratives and yes/no questions. Specifically, I ask two questions: is nuclear accent rightmost? And are yes/no questions associated with higher pitch, as predicted by the Universality of Intonational Meaning? Results are comparable to those reported for other Salish languages, namely Koch (2008, 2011) on Nɬeʔkepmxcín, Jacobs (2007) on Skwxwú7mesh and Benner (2004, 2006) and Leonard (2011) on SENĆOŦEN. Nuclear accent is associated with the rightmost stressed vowel, regardless of focus, and while no speaker signals yes/no questions with a final rise, each has higher pitch within typologically common parameters.
Résumé
Les recherches acoustiques portant sur la prosodie et l'intonation des langues de la côte nord-ouest ont, jusqu’à très récemment, été peu nombreuses. Cet article complémente ces recherches et présente la première étude de l'intonation du St’át'imcets (le salish Lillooet; le salish de l'Intérieur du nord). L'article a pour but de tester la généralisation de Davis (2007) selon laquelle il n'y a pas de corrélation entre la structure de l'information et la prosodie dans les langues salish, en comparant l'intonation des phrases déclaratives et des phrases interrogatives totales. Deux questions de recherche nous préoccupent : Est-ce que l'accent tonique est à droite? et Est-ce que les phrases interrogatives totales sont caractérisées par un ton plus aigu, tel que prédit par l'Universalité du sens intonationnel? Nos résultats sont similaires à ceux obtenus dans des études portant sur d'autres langues salishiennes, en particulier Koch (2008, 2011) pour le Nɬeʔkepmxcín, Jacobs (2007) pour le Skwxwú7mesh et Benner (2004, 2006) et Leonard (2011) pour le SENĆOŦEN. L'accent tonique est associé à la dernière voyelle accentuée, peu importe le focus, et alors qu'aucun locuteur n'emploie un ton final aigu dans une phrase interrogative totale, chacun a un ton plus aigu dans le cadre de paramètres typologiques communs.
Keywords
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , July 2016 , pp. 119 - 155
- Copyright
- © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2016
Footnotes
*
I am so grateful to my wonderful language consultants Aggie Patrick, Carl Alexander and Laura Thevarge. Special thanks to Henry Davis, Karsten Koch, and Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins for their generous expertise and feedback. Thanks also to Doug Pulleyblank, the anonymous reviewers, and the audience at ICSNL 50 for feedback on previous drafts of this paper. Any errors are my own.
References
Barthmaier, Paul. 2004. Intonation units in Okanagan. In Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade, ed. Gerdts, Donna and Matthewson, Lisa, 30–34. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17.Google Scholar
Bates, Dawn, and Carlson, Barry. 1989. Prosodic structure in Spokane morphology. Working papers of the Linguistics Circle of UVic 8: 75–95.Google Scholar
Beck, David. 1999. Words and prosodic phrasing in Lushootseed. In Studies on the phonological word, ed. Hall, T. Allan and Kleinhenz, Ursula, 23–46. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Beck, David. 2000. Grammatical convergence and the genesis of diversity in the Northwest Coast Sprachbund. Anthropological Linguistics 42(2): 1–67.Google Scholar
Beck, David, and Bennett, David. 2007. Extending the prosodic hierarchy: Evidence from Lushootseed narrative. Northwest Journal of Linguistics 1(1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary, and Edwards, Jan. 1994. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology III, ed. Keating, Patricia, 7–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary, and Elam, Gayle Ayers. 1997. Guidelines for ToBI labeling. Guidelines version 3.0, Columbus: The Ohio State University Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology 3: 255–309.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary, Hirschberg, Julia, and Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2004. Chapter 2: The Original ToBI System and the Evolution of the ToBI Framework. 37 pp. Columbia University Academic Commons, http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:21280. Later published in Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. Sun-Ah Jun [2007]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benner, Allison. 2004. The prosody of SENĆOŦEN, a pilot study. Paper presented at the 41st International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Benner, Allison. 2006. The relationship between intonational and syntactic phrases in SENĆOŦEN: An exploratory study. Ms., University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Bianco, Violet. 1996. The role of sonority in the prosody of Cowichan. Master's thesis, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Bird, Sonya. 2011. Phonetic fieldwork in the Pacific Northwest. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. Lee, Wai-Sum and Zee, Eric, 76–79. City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Blake, Susan. 1995. Sandhi domains and coronal consonants in St’át'imcets (Lillooet Salish). Paper presented at the third Annual Morphosyntax Workshop, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2007. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 4.5.12) [computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14(2–3): 109–149. Reprinted in Bolinger 1965: 101–117.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Intonation across languages. In Universals of human language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph, Ferguson, Charles and Moravcsik, Edith A., 471–524. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Jason, and Thompson, James. 2005. Is Upriver Halkomelem a tone language? In Papers for the 40th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Brown, Jason, Kiyota, Masaru and Peterson, Tyler, 49–64. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 16.Google Scholar
Brown, Jason, and Thompson, James. 2013. The emergence of determiner clisis in Upriver Halkomelem. Northwest Journal of Linguistics 7(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion. 2009. Non-exhaustive parsing: Phonetic and phonological evidence from St’át'imcets. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion, and Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2012. Prosodic phrasing in Nxaʔamxčín (Salish) declarative clauses. Canadian Acoustics 40(3): 16–17.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion, and Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2013a. Tracking intonation patterns in Nxaʔamxčín. Paper presented at the 48th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion, and Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa. 2013b. Tracking intonation patterns in Interior Salish. Poster presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion, and Davis, Henry. 2008. Definitely indefinites? Using acoustics as a diagnostic in St’át'imcets. In Proceedings of Acoustics Week in Canada, ed. Ramakrishnan, Ramani and Laroche, Chantal, 68–69. Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Caldecott, Marion, and Koch, Karsten. 2014. Using mixed media tools for eliciting linguistic data in indigenous languages. Language Documentation and Conservation 8: 209–240.Google Scholar
Caspers, Johanneke. 1998. The melodic marking of question vs. continuation in Dutch. Language and Speech 41(3–4): 375–398.Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju. 2005. Universal and language-specific perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, and McQueen, James. 2005. Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 33(2): 121–157.Google Scholar
Cook, Suzanne. 2000. The Rhetorical Structure of a Lushootseed (Salish) Narrative. Master's thesis, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa, and Kinkade, M. Dale. 1998. Salish languages and linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 1999. Word order in St’át'imcets. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Hinkson, Mercedes, 61–82. Kamloops, BC: Secwepemc Cultural Education Society.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 2005. On the syntax and semantics of negation in Salish. International Journal of American Linguistics, 71(1): 1–55.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 2006. A Teaching Grammar of Upper St’át'imcets. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 2007. Prosody–focus dissociation and its consequences: The case of Salish. Paper presented November 10, 2007, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry. 2012. Two types of discourse configurationality in languages of the Pacific Northwest. Handout from a paper presented at WSCLA 17, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry, and Matthewson, Lisa. 1996. Subordinate clauses and functional projections. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages. University of British Columbia. Retrieved from http://lingserver.arts.ubc.ca/linguistics/sites/default/files/1996_Davis-H_Matthewson.pdfGoogle Scholar
van Eijk, Jan P. (1981). Stress in Lillooet. In University of Montana Working Papers in Linguistics 2, ed. Mattina, Tony and Montler, Timothy, 84–90.Google Scholar
van Eijk, Jan P. 1985/1997. The Lillooet language: Phonology, morphology, syntax. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
van Eijk, Jan P. 1987/2013. Lillooet-English Dictionary. The University of British Columbia Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2.Google Scholar
van Eijk, Jan. 2008. A bibliography of Salish linguistics. Northwest Journal of Linguistics 2(3): 1–128.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline, and Samek-Lodovici, Vierei. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82(1): 131–150.Google Scholar
First Peoples’ Cultural Council. 2014. Report on the Status of B.C. First Nations Languages. 2nd ed. http://www.fpcc.ca/files/PDF/Language/FPCC-LanguageReport-141016-WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna, and Werle, Adam. 2014. Halkomelem clitic types. Morphology 24(3): 245–281.Google Scholar
Gessner, Suzanne. 2002. Prosody in Dakelh: A Comparison of Two Dialects. In Proceedings of the Athabaskan Languages Conference. Available from the Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Gessner, Suzanne. 2004. The Prosodic System of the Dakelh (Carrier) Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Judy. 2014. Intonation is hard to teach. In Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching, ed. Grant, Linda, 107–137. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2005. An autosegmental/metrical model of Chickasaw intonation. In Prosodic transcription and typology: A unified approach, ed. Jun, Sun-Ah, 301–330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2008. Pitch accent timing and scaling in Chickasaw. Journal of Phonetics 36(3): 521–535.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983. Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19(2): 377–417.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1994. English stress in Lexical Phonology. In Phonologica 1992: Proceedings of the 7th International Phonology Meeting, ed. Dressler, Wolfgang U., Prinzhorn, Martin and Rennison, John J., 87–96. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2002. Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence. Retrieved from ISCA Archive [10 March 2015].Google Scholar
Haan, Judith. 2002. Speaking of questions. An exploration of Dutch question intonation. Doctoral dissertation, LOT Graduate School of Linguistics, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 2005. Prosody in two Athabaskan Languages of Northern British Columbia. In Athabaskan Prosody, ed. Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren, 393–423. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin S., and Umeda, Noriko. 1987. Difference limens for fundamental frequency contours in sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81(4): 1139–1145.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina. 2007. Focus and tone. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6: The Notions of information structure, ed. Féry, Caroline, Fanselow, Gisbert and Krifka, Manfred, 221–235. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2006. Prosody in language documentation. In Essentials of language documentation, ed. Gippert, Jost, Himmelmann, Nikolaus and Mosel, Ulrike, 163–181. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huijsmans, Marianne. 2015. Linearization and prosodic phrasing: The case of SENĆOŦEN second-position clitics. Master's thesis, University of Victoria, BC.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Peter. 2007. Intonation of yes/no questions in Skwxwú7mesh. In Papers for the 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín and Oberg, Martin, 236–255. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Janzen, Jonathan. 2011. Phrase- and word-level prosody in Kwak'wala. In Papers for the 46th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Lyon, John and Dunham, Joel, 101–107. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 1993. The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody. Doctoral dissertation, the Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2004. The syntax of sentential stress. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Koch, Karsten. 2008. Intonation and focus in Nlhe7kepmxcin (Thompson River Salish). Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Koch, Karsten. 2010. Some properties of prosodic phrases in Thompson Salish. In Papers from the Linguistics Laboratory (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 52), ed. Jannedy, Stefanie and Weirich, Melanie, 141–158, Berlin: ZASPiL.Google Scholar
Koch, Karsten. 2011. A phonetic study of intonation and focus in Nɬeʔkepmxcin. In Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension, ed. Frota, Sonia, Prieto, Pilar and Elordieta, Gorka, 111–144. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika, and Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2007. Phase theory and prosodic spellout: the case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24(2–3): 93–135.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. Scope inversion under the rise-fall contour in German. Linguistic Inquiry 29(1): 75–112.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6: The notions of information structure, ed. Féry, Caroline, Fanselow, Gisbert and Krifka, Manfred, 13–56. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Paul. 1999. The Salish language family: Reconstructing syntax. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996/2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Janet. 2011. Prosodic units in SENĆOŦEN (North Straits Salish). Ms., University of Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2005. When I was small — I wan kwikws: A grammatical analysis of St’át'imc oral narratives. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Namdaran, Nahal. 2006. Retraction in St’át'imcets: An ultrasonic investigation. Master's thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Noguchi, Masaki. 2011. A preliminary study of intonation in Kwak'wala. In Papers for the 46th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Lyon, John and Dunham, Joel, 321–350. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Oberg, Martin. 2007. Intonation Contours in St’át'imcets. In Papers for the 42nd International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín and Oberg, Martin, 357–360. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1983. Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica 40(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1984. An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1995. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound symbolism, ed. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John, Dunn, John A., and Sprouse, Rex. 2004. Prosody and phonology. Paper presented at Speech Prosody 2004. Nara, Japan. Retrieved from ISCA Archive [10 March 2015]Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1979. The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66(2): 363–369.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht: Utrecht University OTS.Google Scholar
Roberts, Taylor. 1993. Lillooet stress shift and its implications for syllabic structure and prosody. In Papers for the 28th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, 297–315. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Roberts, Taylor, and Shaw, Patricia A.. 1994. Optimality in the St’át'imcets (Lillooet Salish) stress system. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold, and Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 1, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. Givenness, AvoidF, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7(2): 141–177.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1995. Sentence Prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. Goldsmith, John, 550–569. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shahin, Kimary, and Blake, Susan. 2004. A phonetic study of schwa in St’át'imcets (Lillooet Salish). In Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade, ed. Gerdts, Donna and Matthewson, Lisa, 311–327. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary, Pitrelli, John, Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Hirschberg, Julia. 1992. TOBI: a standard for labelling English prosody. In Proceedings of the second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 867–870. Edmonton: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath, and van Heuven, Vincent. 1996a. Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 2. 630–633. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.Google Scholar
Sluijter, Agaath, and van Heuven, Vincent. 1996b. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100(4): 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Sorensen, John, and Cooper, William E.. 1979. Syntactic coding of fundamental frequency in speech production. In Perception and production of fluent speech, ed. Cole, R. A., 399–440. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steele, Shirley A. 1986. Nuclear accent F0 peak location: effects of rate, vowel, and number of following syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80(S1): S51.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.Google Scholar
Watt, Linda, Alford, Michael, Cameron-Turley, Jen, Gillon, Carrie, and Jacobs, Peter. 2000. Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish Salish) Stress: A look at the acoustics of /a/ and /u/. In Papers for the 35th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, ed. Gessner, Suzanne and Oh, Sunyoung, 199–217. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Werle, Adam. 2007. Ditidaht vowel alternations and prosody. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 52(1–2): 71–104.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne, and Blakemore, Diane. 2006. The prosody-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10): 1537–1541.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zubizaretta, Maria Luisa. To appear. Information structure and nuclear stress. In The Oxford handbook of information structure, ed. Féry, Caroline and Ishihara, Shinichiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar