Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:05:29.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prédicats théoriques et données externes: syntaxe diachronique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Jean-Yves Morin
Jean-Yves Morin*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

L’application d’une théorie linguistique, essentiellement élaborée à partir de données internes, à des données externes (diachronie, acquisition, performance, pathologie, traitement informatique, etc.) et sa vérification à partir de ces dernières pose de nombreux problèmes. Le premier de ces problèmes est celui de l’exportation des prédicats de la théorie dans un domaine autre (et généralement plus englobant) que celui pour lequel ils ont été définis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 443 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Althusser, Louis 1968 Lire le Capital. Petite Collection Maspéro. Paris: Maspéro.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit, réd. 1985 Syntax and Semantics: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, réd. 1983 The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Colmerauer, Alain 1984 Equations and Inequations on Finite and Infinite Trees. Pp. 85-99 dans Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Gen eration Computer Systems. Tokyo: Institute for Fifth Generation Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Colmerauer, Alain 1985 Prolog in 10 Figures. Communications of the ACM 28:1296–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville 1983 Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dahl, Veronica 1985 Logic Metagrammars for Natural Language Analysis. Technical Report, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques, et Pichon, Edouard 1911- Des mots à la pensée, Essai de grammaire de la langue française. 7 volumes et un supplément. Paris: D’Artrey. [1911-1940].Google Scholar
Dowty, David et al, réds. 1985 Natural Language Parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien 1928 Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. 3e édition. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Galet, Yvette 1971 L’évolution de l’ordre des mots dans la phrase française de 1600 à 1700. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald et al 1985 Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald et al 1987 Category Structures. Rapport CSLI-87-102. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Joshi, Aravind 1985 Tree Adjoining Grammars: How Much Context-Sensitivity is Re quired to Provide Reasonable Structural Descriptions? Pp. 206–250 dans Natural Language Parsing. Dowty, David et al, réds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri 1986 Features and Values. Pp. 17–36 dans A Compilation of Papers on Unification-Based Grammar Formalisms. Shieber, Stuart et al, réds. Parts I and II, Rapport CSLI-86-48. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Kasper, Robert 1987 A Unification Method for Disjunctive Feature Descriptions. Pp. 235–242 dans Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 25. Stanford.Google Scholar
Kasper, Robert, et Rounds, William 1986 A Logical Semantics for Feature Structures. Pp. 257–266 dans Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 24. New York.Google Scholar
Kay, Martin 1985 Parsing in Functional Unification Grammar. Pp. 251–278 in Natural Language Parsing. Dowty, David et al, réds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilbury, James 1986 Category Cooccurrence Restrictions and the Elimination of Metarules. Pp. 50–55 dans les Actes de COLING 86. Bonn: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith 1981 Some Problems in the Theory of Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith 1985 The Independence of Syntax and Phonology in Cliticization. Language 61:95–120.Google Scholar
Kok, Ans de 1985 La place du pronom personnel régime conjoint en français: Une étude diachronique. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Morin, Jean-Yves 1975 Old French Clitics and the “Extended Standard Theory”. Chicago Linguistic Society 11:390–400.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith 1985 Syntaxe. Notes de cours polycopiées. Département de linguistique et philologie, Univ. de Montréal et Groupe intelligence artificielle, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Université d’Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith 1986 Théorie syntaxique et théorie du parsage. Rapport technique. Département de linguistique et philologie, Université de Montréal et Groupe intelligence artificielle, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Université d’Aix-Marseille.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith 1988 Particules et parsage universel. Dans Proceedings of the First International Congress on Language Particles. Weydt, Haald, réd. Berlin: de Gruyter, [à paraître].Google Scholar
Pereira, Fernando, et Warren, David H. 1980 Definite Clause Grammars for Language Analysis — A Survey of the Formalism and a Comparison with Augmented Transition Networks. Artificial Intelligence 13:231–278.Google Scholar
Pereira, Fernando, et Shieber, Stuart 1986 The Semantics of Grammar Formalisms Seen as Computer Lan guages. Pp. 37–58 dans A Compilation of Papers on Unification- Based Grammar Formalisms. Parts I and II, Rapport CSLĪ-86-48. Shieber, Stuart et al, réds. Stanford: Center for the Study of the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl 1984 Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars and Natural Languages. Thèse de doctorat inédite, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl 1985 Phrase Structure Grammars without Metarules. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 4:246–261.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl, et Sag, Ivan 1987 An Information-Based Approach to Syntax and Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes 13, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Proudian, Derek, et Goddeau, David 1987 Constituent Coordination in HPSG. Rapport CSLI-87-97, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Herbert 1966 Weak Pronoun Position in the Early Romance Languages. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ristad, Eric S. 1986 Computational Complexity of Current GPSG Theory. Pp. 30–49 dans les Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics 24. New York.Google Scholar
Ristad, Eric S. 1987 Revised Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Pp.243–250 dans Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stanford.Google Scholar
Rounds, William, et Kasper, Robert 1986 A Complete Logical Calculus for Record Structures Representing Linguistic Information. Pp. 38–43 dans Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. Cambridge, Mass.: IEEE.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan 1986 Grammatical Hierarchy and Linear Precedence. Rapport CSLI-86-60, Stanford: Center for the Study of Linguage and Information.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan, et Pollard, Carl 1987 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: An Informal Synopsis. Rapport CSLI-87-79, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan et al 1985 Coordination and How to Distinguish Categories. National Language and Linguistic Theory 3:117–171.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter 1985 Lectures on Contemporary Syntactic Theories. CSLI Lecture Notes 3, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart 1986a An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 4, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart 1986b A Simple Reconstruction of GPSG. Pp. 211–215 dans les Actes de COLING 11. Bonn: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart et al 1986 A Compilation of Papers on Unification-Based Grammar Formalisms. Parts I and II, Rapport CSLI-86-48, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Steele, Susan 1977 Clisis and Diachrony. Pp. 539–579 dans Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Li, Ch., red. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Uszkoreit, Hans 1986 Categorial Unification Grammars. Rapport CSLI-86-66, Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter 1974 The Evolution of Romance Clitic Order. Dans Linguistic Studies in Romance Languages. Campbell, R.J. et al, réds. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter 1987 The Development of Clitics from Latin to Old Romance. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold 1977 On Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar