Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:32:10.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Live with External Evidence in Phonology: A Note on the Challenge of Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Rajendra Singh
Rajendra Singh*
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As far as phonology and morphology are concerned, the available evidence indicates that the role of L1 in shaping interlanguage is confined to those of its rules that are needed to account for its global alternations, alternations that are independent of its morphology (cf. Cearly 1974, Dressler 1985, Kilbury 1981, Singh and Ford 1982, 1987, Singh and Martohardjono 1989, Wode 1978, and Wurzel 1977, among others). The rules needed to account for the local, morphologically dependent alternations of L1 or the ones needed to account for its word-formation processes do not play such a role. Interference, in other words, can be caused only by across-the-board phonological rules of L1. So-called morphophonemic rules of L1 do not cause it, and morphological interference from L1 seems not to exist as word-formation errors in intermorphology are the results of illegal extensions of L2 word-formation rules (cf. Singh 1989 and Singh and Martohardjono 1989). The purpose of this note is to critically examine the accounts contemporary theories of phonology provide of this state of affairs and to argue that the account provided by the sort of theory proposed in Ford and Singh (1983, 1985a, 1985b) and Singh and Ford (1982, 1987) is the most satisfactory one.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Linguistic Theory and External Evidence , December 1988 , pp. 423 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cearly, Alv 1974 The Only Phonological Rule-Ordering Principle. Pp. 30–40 in Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Bruck, A., Fox, R. et al, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia, and Stampe, David 1979 The Study of Natural Phonology. Pp. 126–173 in Current Approaches to Phonological Theory. Dinnsen, D.A., ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.]Google Scholar
Dressier, Wolfgang 1972 Morphonology. Ann Arbour, Michigan: Karoma.Google Scholar
Ford, Alan, and Singh, Rajendra 1983 On the Status of Morphophonology. Pp. 63–78 in The Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Richardson, J. et al, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ford, Alan, and Singh, Rajendra 1985a On the Directionality of Word Formation Rules. Pp. 205–213 in Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 84. Alvarez, G. et al, eds. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ford, Alan, and Singh, Rajendra 1985b Towards a Non-Paradigmatic Morphology. Pp. 87–95 in Berkeley Linguistic Society XI. Niepokuj, M. et al., eds. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan 1976 An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kilbury, James 1981 German Umlaut as a Multi-Level Learning Problem. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19:152–164.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1982 Lexical Morphology and Phonology. Pp. 3–91 in Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Yange, J.S., ed. Seoul: Hanshin Publishers.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul 1985 Some Theoretical Consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2:85–138.Google Scholar
Linell, Per 1979 Psychological Reality in Phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K.P. 1982 Lexical Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Odden, David 1979 Some Unnatural Consequences of Natural Generative Phonology. A Review of J.B. Hooper, An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology (1976). Linguistic Analysis 5:439–461.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi 1972 The Phonological Representation of English Inflectional Endings. Glossa 6:117–127.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1981 The English Plural. Recherches Linguistiques à Montréal 17:145–148.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1985 Prosodic Adaptation in Interphonology. Lingua 67:269–282.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1986 A Plea for External Evidence. Paper for the 7th International Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Helsinki. August, 1986.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1989 Morphology, Interlexica and Bilingualism. Paper presented at the 7th Symposium on Spanish and Portuguese Bilingualism, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1983). To appear in Lele, Jayant K. and Singh, Rajendra, Language and Society: Steps Towards an Integrated Theory. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra, and Ford, Alan 1982 Intereference, Overgeneralization, Adaptive Rules and Phonological Theory. The Uses of Phonology, Southern University Illinois Work ing Papers 12:114–121.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra, and Ford, Alan 1987 Interphonology and Phonological Theory. Pp. 163–172 in Sound Pattern in Second Language Acquisition. James, A. and Leather, J., eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra, and Martohardjono, Gita 1989 Morphological Theory and Intermorphology. Paper presented at the MIT Symposium on Linguistic Theory and Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Mass (1985). To appear in O’Neil, Wayne and Flyn, Susanne, eds., Linguistic Theory and Second Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Stampe, David 1971 How I Spent My Summer Vacation. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Stampe, David 1984 On Phonological Representations. Pp. 287–300 in Phonologica 1984. Dressier, Wolfgang et al, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1974 Words and Syllables in Natural Generative Grammar. Pp. 346–374 in Papers from the Parasession on Natural Generative Phonology. Bruck, A., Fox, R. et al, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Wode, Henning 1978 The Beginnings of Non-Schoolroom L2 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16:109–126.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1977 Adaptionsregeln und heterogene Sprachsysteme. Pp. 1–4 in Phonologica. Dressler, Wolfgang U. and Pfeiffer, O.E., eds. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar