Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T14:28:57.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The English auxiliaries: A relational network description

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Peter A. Reich
Peter A. Reich*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is the second of two papers comparing relational network theory with transformational theory. In Reich 1970b we defined some basic nodes and compared relational network theory with a subset of transformational theory which is commonly acknowledged to be linguistically inadequate. In this paper we shall review the types of problems which context-free phrase-structure grammars cannot adequately handle. We shall then show that each of these problems occurs in that portion of English grammar which is concerned with the English auxiliaries; thus a good test of any proposed grammatical theory is whether or not it can be used to describe a grammar of the auxiliaries in an acceptable way. Finally, we shall describe in detail a relational network grammar of the auxiliaries and attempt to demonstrate that relational network theory passes this test.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , Fall 1970 , pp. 18 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arden, B. W., Galler, B., Graham, R., Organick, E., Boettner, D. W., and Bolas, B., The Michigan Algorithm Decoder (The MAD Manual). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, 1966.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G., Fodor, J. A., and Weksel, W., “On the acquisition of syntax: a critique of ‘contextual generalization.’” Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 432–67. Reprinted in Jakobovits, L. A. and Miron, M. S. (eds), Readings in the Psychology of Language. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967, 257–73.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. s., “On learning the grammatical order of words,” Psychological Review, 1963, 70, 323–48. Reprinted in Jakobovits, L. A. and Miron, M. S. (eds), Readings in the Psychology of Language. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967, 232–56.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Current issues in linguistic theory. In Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J. (eds), The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964, 50–118.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Lectures given while a visiting professor at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., Fall, 1967.Google Scholar
Harman, G. H., “Generative grammars without transformation rules: a defence of phrase structure,” Language, 1963, 39, 597–616.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. D., Hudson, R. A., Winter, E. O., and Henrici, A., Sentence and Clause in Scientific English. Report of the research project “The linguistic properties of scientific English.” Communication Research Centre, Department of General Linguistics, University College, London.Google Scholar
Joos, M., The English Verb. Madison, Wisc; The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M., “On alternation, transformation, realization and stratification.” In STUART, C. I. J. M. (ed). Report on the Fifteenth Annual (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics 17. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1964, 105–22.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M., Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington D.C; Georgetown University Press, 1966a.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M., Prolegomena to a theory of phonology,” Language, 1966b, 42, 537–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccarthy, J., Abrahams, P. W., Edwards, D. J., Hart, T. P., and Levin, M. I., LISP 1.5 Programmers Manual. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Computation Center and Research Laboratory of Electronics, 1962.Google Scholar
Newell, L. E., “Stratification analysis of an English text,” Appendix to Lamb, 1966a, 71–106.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R., The English Verb. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M., Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York; Harper and Row, 1968.Google Scholar
Reich, P. A., “Order in deep structure.” Paper given at the winter meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1969.Google Scholar
Reich, P. A., “A relational Network Model of Language Behavior.” Ph.D. dissertation. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, 1970a.Google Scholar
Reich, P. A., “Relational networks,” Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 1970b, 15. 95–110.Google Scholar
Yngve, v. H. “A model and an hypothesis for language structure.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1960, 104, 444–66.Google Scholar