Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:23:48.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Lightfoot, The Language Lottery. Cambridge, Mass., and London: The MIT Press. 1982. Pp. xii + 224. $17.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

William O’Grady
William O’Grady*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews article/Compte-rendu critique
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , Fall 1983 , pp. 161 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, C. (1978) Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Carden, G. (1982) “Backwards anaphora in discourse context.” Journal of Linguistics 18.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1969) The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980) Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N., and Lightfoot, D. (1981) “Introduction.” In Hornstein and Lightfoot, eds, Explanation in Linguistics, New York: Longman, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
Ingram, D., and Shaw, C. (MS) “The comprehension of pronominal reference in children.” Linguistics Department, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. (1980) “Cognitive schemes and their possible relation to language acquisition.” In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Language and Learning, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, pp. 132–37.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. (1983a) “A computational approach to pronominalization.” Journal of Linguistic Research 2:4.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. (1983b) “Anaphoric relations in the clause and the NP.” Papers from the Nineteenth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1981) “Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains.” Linguistic Inquiry 12: 605 – 35.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (to appear) “Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora question.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, H., and Culicover, P. (1980) Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
Zutell, J. (1979) “Spelling strategies of primary school children and their relationship to Piaget’s concept of decentration.” Research in the Teaching of English 13: 69–80.Google Scholar